




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
CIFFWP4PolicyBriefTransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesPolicyprioritiesfortheG20JudithTysonandPrashantVazeJuly
2023Keypolicy
recommendationsFinancetosupportinvestmentsto
reducegreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsfrom
hard-to-abatesectors,alsoreferredto
astransitionfinance,needs
tobeexpanded.Thiswillrequire:?
Mandatory
climate-relateddisclosuresandcapitaladequacyframeworks
alignedto
major
exportmarkets’regulatoryrequirements,withweightings
thatfavourcredibleandambitious
transitionplanning.?
Carbonpricingto
aligntransitioningindustries’economicandenvironmentalperformance
incentives
whileprotectingindustryfromhigh-carbonsubstitutesproducedoutsidejurisdictionsand
permitting
importsfromjurisdictionswitheffectivecarbonpricingpolicies.?
Strengthenedsupply-sidepublicpolicy
includingtighterregulationsto
obligenewtechnologyuptake,
nationaldecarbonisingvisions,innovation
subsidies
andprocurementstandards,streamlinedlegal
andlicensingprocedures,andtransitionprojectpipelines.?
Greateruseofpublicexpenditureincludingblendedfinance,leveraginggovernmentsubsidies,issuanceofpublictransitionbonds,publictechnology
developmentandtransfer
andcapacity-buildingforfinanceprofessionals.?
Increasedpolicylending
suchas
mandatorysectortargets,highersectoralandborrowerlimitsandcoordinatednationalpolicyforhard-to-abatesectors.CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesReaders
areencouragedto
reproducematerialfortheirownpublications,aslongas
they
arenotbeingsoldcommercially.ODIrequests
dueacknowledgementandacopyofthe
publication.Foronlineuse,
weask
readers
tolinktotheoriginalresource
on
theODIwebsite.Theviewspresentedinthispaperarethoseof
theauthor(s)anddonot
necessarilyrepresenttheviewsof
ODIor
ourpartners.ThisworkislicensedunderCCBY-NC-ND4.0.Howtocite:Tyson,J.
andVaze,P.
(2023)Transitionfinanceforemergingeconomies:policyprioritiesfor
the
G20.PolicyBrief.London:ODI(/en/publications/transition-finance-for-emerging-economies/)2CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesContents12Introduction688Supportingprivatetransitionfinance2.12.2riskylendingThelandscapeforprivatetransitionfinanceAdaptingbankregulatoryframeworkstodiscourageclimate91010111112141515161717182.32.4DevelopingspecialistinstrumentsandfundsPolicylending34Transitiontaxonomiesandstandards3.1TransitiontaxonomiesandgreentaxonomiesInternationaltaxonomies3.23.3VoluntarystandardsettinganddisclosureCreatinganenablingpolicyenvironment4.1Supply-sidepublicpolicies4.24.34.44.5MDBandDFIsupportFundingresearchanddevelopmentDemand-sidepublicpolicyinterventionsCross-cuttingpolicyinterventions3CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesAcknowledgementsWewouldliketo
thank
SarahColenbranderandLorenaGonzalez
forsupervisionandhelpful
commentsontheoutlineandanearlierversionof
this
draft.Weare
gratefulto
The
Children’sInvestmentFundFoundationfortheirfinancialsupportto‘UnlockingfinanceforIndia’stransitionto
aresilient,Paris-aligned
economy’.Theusualdisclaimersapply.AbouttheauthorsJudithTysonJudithTysonisaspecialistinfinancefordevelopment,includingfinancial
marketdevelopment,privateinvestmentand
climatefinance.Herresearchinterestsinclude
greenbonds,privateclimatefinanceandfinancial
development.Prashant
VazePrashantVazeisanenvironmentaleconomistandclimatefinancespecialist.Hehas
heldpositionsinthe
UKcivilservice,environmentalNGOs,
apensions
firm,andagreenfinancethinktank.He
hasworkedinHongKong
andiscurrentlybasedinIndia.AcronymsAfDBADBAfricanDevelopmentBankAsianDevelopmentBankASEANCA100+CBIAssociationof
SoutheastAsian
NationsClimateAction100plusClimateBondsInitiativeCDPCarbonDisclosure
ProjectEMEmergingmarketESGEU-ETSG20Economic,socialandgovernanceEUEmissionsTradingSystemGroupof20GHGMDBMETINGFSGreenhousegasMultilateraldevelopment
bankMinistryofEconomy,Trade
andIndustry(Japan)(Centralbanksandsupervisors)
NetworkforGreeningtheFinancial
SystemOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopmentOECDOJKOtoritasJasaKeuangan(Indonesianfinancialregulator)SBTiScienceBased
TargetInitiativeSustainable
FinanceActionCouncil
(Canada)Sustainable
FinanceWorkingGroupSustainabilitylinked
bond/loanTaskforceonClimate-RelatedFinancialDisclosuresSFACSFWGSLB/LTCFD4CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesTPITransitionPathwaysInitiativeUS-ICEFUnitedStates-India
CleanEnergy
Facility5CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:Transitionfinanceforemergingeconomies1
IntroductionAnunresolved
itemonthe
climateagenda
is
acceleratingthetransitionin
high-emission,hard-to-abatesectorssuchascement,steel,
plastics,trucking,shippingandaviation.
Togethertheserepresent30%of
energy-relatedgreenhousegas(GHG)emissions.Theyarealsoessentialforeconomicdevelopment
inanet-zeroworld.Technologicalinnovation,financialsupportandanenablingpolicyenvironmentareneededtotransitionthemtolow-orzero-GHGemissions(IPCC,2023;EnergyTransitionsCommission,2023).Substantialbanklending
isavailabletothesesectors–includinginmajor
emergingmarkets
–butitisnotappliedtotransition1investments.Internationalprivatefinanceforemergingeconomies
islimitedbecauseofgeneralriskaversionand
disincentives
toinvestment
inhard-to-abatesectors.Thisadds
to
the
challenges
foremergingeconomies,includingthattheirhard-to-abateindustrialsectors
constitute
alargershareof
theireconomy
with
proportionatelylarger
fossilfuelproductionand2emission-intensive
industries,suchas
mining,agriculture
andheavyindustry(Ahman,2020).UndertheIndonesianPresidencythe
G20
highlightedtheneed
forprivate
transitionfinance
foremergingeconomies
andestablishedtheG20
TransitionFinanceFramework.Thisdocument
settheagendathroughfive‘pillars’to
mobilisemoresustainablefinance(G20FMCB,2022;G20
SFWG,2023).Thesefivepillarsare:1)Identifyingtransitionalactivitiesandinvestments2)Reportinginformationon
transitionactivitiesandinvestments3)Developingtransition-relatedfinanceinstruments4)Designingpolicymeasures5)Assessingandmitigatingnegativesocialandeconomicimpacts
of
transitionactivitiesandinvestments.1Definedas95emergingmarketandmiddle-incomeeconomies(MICs)./external/datamapper/datasets/FM2By
contrast,
in
low-income
countries
(LICs)
there
is
a
lack
of
a
substantive
existing
private
sector
thatwill
require
transitioning,
although
‘pure’
green
finance
and
development
finance
will
continue
to
be
critical.6CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesThispaperlooks
atwhatmoretheG20
can
doto
unlock
transitionfinancefor
emergingeconomies,withafocus
onPillars1,
2,
3and
4ofthis
framework.Pillar5
isacross-cuttingrecommendationrunningthroughtheotherfour.
Section2discussesthelandscapefor
privatefinancefortransitionandhowcentralbanksandgovernmentscandirectmoreprivatefinanceintotransitioninvestments,includingthroughadaptivecapitaladequacyframeworks,encouraginginnovativefinancialinstrumentsandusingpolicylending.Section3discussesthe
currentstateof
andoptimalpathforsustainablefinance
taxonomiesandclimate-relatedriskdisclosurestoensurethatinvestorssupply
transitionfinance,includingtheneedforagreeddefinitions
of
whatisincludedandexcludedand
strongergovernancethroughclearperformancemetrics.Section4
looksat
furtherstepstocreatean
enablingenvironment
fortransitionfinance.Thisincludespoliciesto
incentiviseinvestmentinlow-GHG-emittingtechnologiesinhard-to-abatesectors,includingcarbontaxes,
andmeasures
toincreaseinvestordemandthrougheasingassetdiscovery.7CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:Transitionfinanceforemergingeconomies2
SupportingprivatetransitionfinanceHard-to-abatesectorssuchas
ironand
steel,cementandpetrochemicalsare
highlycapitalintensive,
operated
by
large,listedcorporationsand
tradein
international
markets.
Thesesectorsalready
access
privatefinance.Butthisfinance
needs
tobechannelledintopro-transitioninvestments.Inemergingmarketsmorefinanceneeds
tocomeviacapitalmarkets,
particularlyfrominternationalinstitutionalinvestors.2.1
Thelandscapeforprivatetransition
finance3Themajorityof
financetohard-to-abatesectorsis
banklending,estimatedat
$20
trillionglobally.Ofthis,approximately
15%went
toemergingeconomies,excludingChina.Thislevelof
creditissubstantive,
and
it
iswell-diversifiedacrosssectors.
But,while4availabledatadoesnotclearlyquantify
itsapplication,itislikely
onlyaminorityhas
beenappliedto
pro-transitioninvestments.Similarly,whilegreenandsustainability-linkedbonds
onlyasbeenissuedastransition5Between2016and2022,approximately$250billion
was
privatelyinvestedgloballyinnewclimatetechnologies,with80%of
thiscomingfrom
private
venturecapital(BostonConsultingGroup,
2021).Themajorityof
thisisin
advancedeconomies
and
morethan90%wentto
energy.Bycontrast,technologies
relevantto
hard-to-abatesectorsreceivedonly3%ofthisfinanceandtheamount
thatwenttoemergingeconomieswasnegligible.Increasingtheamount
offinanceanddirecting
moreof
itintopro-transitioninvestmentsandR&Dwillrequireaddressingfundamentalissuesof
weak
privateinvestorriskappetite
foremergingmarkets63Sources
include
the
Bank
for
International
Settlements
statistical
database,
Climate
Bond
Initiative
and
annualreportsofleading
emergingmarket
and
internationalbanks.4For
example,
in
India
40%
of
2022
total
bank
credit
(excluding
personal
loans)
is
to
industry
including
construction(9%),metals
(4%)andtransportand
storage(5%)(Ghoshet
al.,2022;RBI,2022).5Although
it
is
much
more
clearly
‘ring-fenced’
for
pro-transition
investments
because
of
the
taxonomy
andgovernancestandardswhich
accompanythesebonds.6Reflecting
this,
since
2007
sovereign
emerging
market
credit
ratings
havesuffered
a
long-term
decline.
Between2008
and
2021,
Standard
andPoor’saverage
creditratingfor
emerging
marketsfell
from
BB+
toBB-.
By2021,
outof
the
54
emerging
markets
defined
by
S&P,
only
18
had
‘investment
grade’
ratings
and
ratings
for
31
were
verypoor(Bor
CC).8CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:Transitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesandthe
needforstrongerincentivesforbank
lendingto
pro-transitioninvestments.Achievingthisis
being
mademore
difficult
bypossiblefuture
financialsectorregulation.This
might‘pricein’climaterisksforcarbon-intensivefirms–makingfinance
scarcerandmorecostly
forhard-to-abatesectors(Erenet
al.,2020).Thissectiondiscusseshowadjusted
regulatoryframeworks,specialistinstrumentsandpolicydirectedfinance
couldassist.InSection4,
thepotentialroleofMDBsandDFIsisdiscussed.2.2
Adaptingbankregulatoryframeworks
todiscourageclimate-riskylendingLedbytheNetworkfor
GreeningtheFinancialSystem(NGFS),climate-relatedriskstoregulated
institutionsand
tofinancialstabilityarebeingassessed.Newnationalregulatory
frameworksareemergingfocusedonriskmodels,
disclosures
and
taxonomies(NGFS,2023;ESRB,2023).Therehasbeendiscussion
on
incorporating
climaterisksintoregulatorycapitalframeworks.Thiswouldleadtohigherriskweightsforhigher-emission
sectorsandcountries
orregionsmoreexposedtoclimaterisks–whichis
tosay,themajorityof
emergingeconomiesandhard-to-abatesectors–raisingtheircostofcredit.Anyregulatoryreforms
needto
tread
afineline
betweendiscouraging
‘business
asusual’investments
incarbon-intensiveequipmentandincreasingthecostoftransition
financebeingappliedtoreducehard-to-abate
firms’emissions.Capitaladequacyrequirementsmustthereforediscriminate
betweenpotentialstrandedassetsand
transitional
assetsenroutetodecarbonisation
(Tandon,2021;Menon,2022;
ESRB,2023).Adjustingcapitaladequacystandardsto
reflectexpected,ratherthancurrent,transitionrisksforhard-to-abatesectorswouldbeoneapproachto
directlendingaway
frominvestmentsthatexacerbateclimate
risk.To
besuccessfulandavoid‘greenwashing’,suchadjustmentsneedto
beaccompaniedby
strongaccountability
andtransparencystandards
requiringcompanies
toset
‘credible’
plansandtheirprogressinexecutingthem(NGFS,2023).Similarframeworksareneededincapital
markets.In
2022,theInternationalCapitalMarketAuthorityandtheClimateBondInitiativeseparatelyissuedguidanceonthe
use-of-proceeds
and
expectationsfortransitionplans.The
CBIis
also
developingsector-specificstandardsforchemicals,cement
andsteel(ICMA,2022;CBI,2022a).Therehasbeen
criticismthatthresholdshavebeenset
toolowtobeeffective(HaqandDoumbia,2022).
Moreworkisneeded.9CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesTransitionfinancecouldalsobepromotedviabanks
emissiontargetsanddisclosuresprocessesto
unlock
‘credit’forfuture
emissionsreductions.Thiswouldmeanthatbanksare
notdisincentivisedfromavoidingtransitionfinanceentirelyjusttomeettheirownGHGemissions
targets.2.3
Developing
specialistinstruments
and
fundsTransition
bondsissuance
incapital
markets
and,
globally,reached$7billionasatDecember2021.Mosthavebeenbysovereigngovernments,MDBs
and
DFIs.Better-ratedemergingmarketsovereignscouldalsoconsiderissuingtransitionbonds.Bonds
with
specialistESGfeatureswouldalsobe
positive.Forexample,impactandgreeninvestors
mighthaveappetiteespeciallywherethebondiscombinedwithsocial
andpovertyalleviationimpact
(IFC,2023).Itwillalsobe
importantto
develop
hedginginstrumentstoenable
investorstomanageriskseffectivelyat
aportfoliolevel,includingderivativesandinsurance.2.4
PolicylendingSomegovernmentsand
centralbankshavemandatesto
provideordirectconcessionalfinancingtoprioritysectors.Forexample,in
Indiabanks
aresetminimumlendinglevelsto
prioritysectors
(Vazeet
al.,2022),and
inEastAsia
governments
partneredwithbanks
as
part
ofindustrialstrategypartnershipswith
localindustrialconglomerates(forexample,Chang,2002)
to
increasethesupplyorreducethe
costofcredit
forspecificsectors.Similar
policylendingmandatescouldbeissuedto
transitionfinancing,particularlyin
countrieswheresuchpolicylendingisalreadyestablished,orlimits
couldbeputonnon-transitioninghard-to-abateactivities.10CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:Transitionfinanceforemergingeconomies3
TransitiontaxonomiesandstandardsTheexpansionofinternationaltransitionfinancefrom
advancedtoemergingmarketeconomiesrequiresanagreedsetof
definitions(ideallysharedacrossjurisdictions)
of
qualifyingassetsand
arobustframeworkforborrowersandlenderstodisclosedatato
demonstrateadherencetothesestandards.TheG20
Transition
Finance
Framework’sfirstpillarformobilisingtransitionfinance
is‘put
inplaceeitherataxonomy
oraset
ofprinciples…to
guidefinancialinstitutions
andrealeconomyfirms
toidentifyand
understand
whattransitionactivity
[is]’.Thesecondpillaraimsto
‘ensurethatidentificationoftransitionactivitiesorinvestmentopportunitiesisbasedontransparent,credible,comparable,accountable,andtimeboundclimateobjectives’(G20SFWG,2022).AttheirFebruary2023meeting,
G20
finance
ministers
andcentralbank
governorsemphasisedtheirdesireto
see
transitionfinanceframeworksprogressed
andagreementof
climatedisclosurestandardsthroughtheInternationalSustainabilityStandardsBoard(G20FinanceMinistersand
CentralBank
Governors,2023).Sustainable
financetaxonomiesaretheprimary
toolforensuringconsistent,rigorous
identification
of
complyinginvestments.Voluntaryor
mandatory
reporting
standards
benchmarktheinvestment’s
performanceusingthese
taxonomies.Governmentagencies,central
banksorregulatorshavetypically
beenresponsiblefordevelopingtaxonomies.
Non-state
actors
oftendevelopstandardsorlabels,thoughincreasinglytheyarebeingput
onastatutoryfooting.Thissectiondiscussesinitiativestakenonthefirsttwopillarsthatcouldaidflows
oftransitionfinancefrom
high-incomecountriestoemergingmarkets.3.1
Transition
taxonomiesandgreentaxonomiesGreentaxonomiesidentifynet-zeroemissionsassetsthatalignwiththeParisAgreement(suchas
electricitygeneratedthroughsolarPV).Thesegenerallysetcriteriaorthresholds
which
exclude
insufficientlygreenassets.11CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesHowever,
many
hard-to-abatesectorsdo
nothaveaviabletechnology
forzero-GHGsolutions.Hence,theyarenotregardedaseligiblefor‘green’
finance.
Buthard-to-abatesectorsareanecessarypartof
theeconomyand
willremain
asignificantsourceofGHGemissions
withoutinvestmentto
decarbonisethem.Becauseofthis,governmentsand
regulators
are
introducingtaxonomieswithdifferent
criteriato
handlehard-to-abate
sectors’GHGreductionefforts.Transitiontaxonomiesareapplyingforward-lookingtrajectoriesfor
anindustry’sdecarbonisation,offering
atransparentand
crediblesequenceoflow-emissioninvestmentsratherthanone
fixed
GHGemissionsthreshold.Firmsbenchmarktheirtransitionplansagainstthese
using
short-andmedium-termtargetstoguidetheirGHG
emissionreductions
and
investmentneeds.Financialinstruments
can
referencetheseplansandevaluateperformance
at
the
levelof
awhole
firm
ratherthandiscreteassetsorinvestments
(CBI,2020).Severalkeychallenges
ariseinevaluatingafirm’stransitionplan
orwhenframing
the
transitiontaxonomy
itself.These
include(CBI,2022b):?
Credibility
of
the
transition
plan.
Ensuring
the
plan
is
sufficientlyambitious
compared
to
the
technological
opportunities,measurable
short-
and
long-term
milestones
aredefined
and
thereis
independent
verification
of
progress
and
disclosure
ofperformance.?
Establishing
a
continued
need
for
the
industry.
Many
OECDcountries
are
transitioning
away
from
fossil
fuel
(particularly
coal)power
generation.
But
some
emerging
economies
argue
thatelectricity
demand
outstrips
supply
and
decommissioning
relativelynew
fossil
plant
would
hamper
economic
development.
Henceenergy
utilities
need
transition
finance
fordecarbonisationoftheenergysector.aphased?
Sector-wide
approach.
Focusing
on
individual
companyperformance
encourages
achievement
through
offloading
carbon-intensive
assets
rather
than
decommissioning
them,
flattering
thecompany
but
not
reducing
global
emissions.MSMEs
in
the
supplychain
need
to
be
included
but
smaller
firms
find
adhering
andreporting
on
transition
standards
challenging
due
to
dataavailability,
capacities
and
resources.
A
phased
approach
might
beneededtoreflectsmallerfirms’constraints.Inemergingmarkets
inparticular,inclusionof
local/nationalenvironmentalandsocialissuescan
be
an
additionalchallenge.3.2
International
taxonomies12CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:TransitionfinanceforemergingeconomiesAroundtheworld,30nationalandregionaltaxonomieshavebeenpublished(GTAG,2023).Thisproliferation
is
theresultofcountries’desirestoreflect
nationalprioritiesand
circumstances.
Manybut
notallarebasedon
theEU’staxonomy–the
ChineseandASEANtaxonomiesdiffermarkedly,using
listsof
approvedgreentechnologies
(China)orprinciples(ASEAN)ratherthansector-basedscreeningcriteria.TheEU’ssustainablefinancetaxonomyincludestechnicalscreeningcriteriaforaround70sectors.
Hard-to-abatesectorsthatdonotyethavenet-zero
technologieshavebeenset
interimstandards
basedonthebesttechnologycurrentlyavailable.
Thetechnicalscreeningcriteriaareframedintermsofthe
maximumallowed
GHGemissionsperunit
of
activityor
outputa‘sustainable’firmmay
produce.
TheEUcalculatedthesethresholdsusingcarbondioxideemissions
andactivitydata
submittedbylargecombustionplantsregulatedundertheEU’sEmissionsTradingSystem
(EU-ETS).ThenewMexicanandSouthAfricantaxonomiesdrawon
theEUtaxonomy.
SouthAfricauses
theEUtaxonomyto
definecarbonintensity
thresholdsin
hard-to-abatesectors,basedon
thebest-performingfacilities
operatingwithintheEU(NationalTreasury,2022).TheMexicantaxonomyincludesagricultureandlivestock,whichisexcludedbytheEU.Despiteinvestor
enthusiasm
Japan
hasnot
introducedagreentaxonomy,butitsroadmaps
fortechnologies(describedin
Section3.3)couldbe
useful
transitionpathways
for
aputativetaxonomy(PRI,2023).Canada’sindustry-ledproposedtaxonomyroadmapexplicitlyconsiderstransitionsectors
(SFAC,2022).ASEANcountries
havedevelopedadistinctiveapproachusing
atrafficlightsystemtoidentify‘amber’assets/industriesthatneedfinancingtoreducetheiremissionintensity(ASEANTaxonomy
Board,2023).Amberactivitiesmustmeet
local
environmentalstandards
andhaveconcreteplansto
remedyresidualharm
within
fiveyears.
Indonesia’sgreentaxonomyguidance
includescriteriaforthecoalindustry
(OJK,2022).Theamberstandardforcoalrequirestheplanttousecarboncapture
andstorage(whichisnotyetacommerciallyproventechnology)
andto
remediatesites.Thisproliferation
of
differing
taxonomieshamperscross-bordergreencapitalflowssince
investorshaveto
makejudgementswhetherassetsdeemed
greenbyajurisdiction’staxonomyare
greenintheeyesof
theirowncountry.Thiswillparticularlybe
anissuefortransitionfinance,since
hard-to-abateindustries
alreadystrainagainstgreeninvestors’mandates.Thereare
effortsto
mapthresholdsandcriteriabetweenthetwomost
establishedtaxonomies,theEU’sandChina’s,to
enable
cross-borderflowsof
greencapitalbetweenthetwoblocs.Thereisscope13CIFFWP4PolicyBrief:Transitionfinanceforemergingeconomiestodevelopmoresuchinter-operabilityguidance,butthisisa
cost-intensiveexercise.Apreferredapproachwouldbefortransitionfinance
acrossG20countriesto
adhere
to
a
singlestandardsetofagreedprinciples.3.3
Voluntarystandard-settingand
disclosureAtCOP27,the
UNSecretary-Generallaunchedanewreporton
net-zerocommitmentsbyprivate
actorsto
improvetheintegrityof
net-zeropledges,givenwidespreadperceptions
andevidenceofgreenwashing(UNHighLevelGroup,2022).
Thereareavarietyofvoluntarystandardsfor
setting
goalsanddisclosingachievementsforGHGemissions.Thisallowshard-to-abatefirms
toselectweakerstandardsthatflattertheirperformance
andheightensinvestors’concerns
aboutgreenwashing.Private
organisationsprovidevaluablesupport
totransitionplanning.Thisincludes
developingsectorpathways
(e.g.SBTi,
TransitionPathways
Initiative),dataplatforms
(e.g.Carbon
Disclosure
Project),conveningmarketparticipants
(e.g.ClimateAction100+)ordevelopingscreeningcriteria
(e.g.ClimateBondsInitiative).Togetherthese
serviceshelpensurethatinvesteeshavesufficientlyambitioustargetsand
thattheiractionis
consistent
withthat
ambitionandisdisclosedtostakeholders.Toooften,businessesset
targetswithreferenceto
theircurrentperformance
ratherthanscience-basedpathways.This
makestheirachievementsdifficultto
benchmark
againstthoseoftheirpeersortechnicallyfeasible
(butexpensive)solutions(CBI,2022d).Assetownersandmanagers
with$14trillionunder
management
supporttheTransitionPathwayInitiativemethodology(TPI,2019).Thisfocuses
onacompany’s
management
qualityandcarbonperformance
relativeto
itssectoral
peers.Assessmentshavebeenundertakenforcement,steel,
oilandgas,aluminiumandchemicals.TheCarbonDisclosure
Projectprovidessubscriberswithdataaboutfirms’andpublicbodies’GHGemissionsandtransitionplans.
TheClimateAction100+NetZeroCompany
Benchmark
has
10disclosureindicatorsincludinglong-,medium-and
short-termgoals,capital
allocationandJustTransition(CA100+,2021).CBIisproducingtransitionstandardsfor
hard-to-abatesectorstocomplementits
long-establishedgreentaxonomy.Anexample
isthecriteriaforironandsteel(CBI,2022e).Thesevoluntarystandardshavebeenuseful
forexperimentationandlearning,
butitisimportantthatG20countriesusecommonstandards.TheInternationalSustainabilityStandardsBoard(ISSB)whichbrings
together
many
standard
settingbodies
launchedtheClimate-relatedDisclosuresStandard.
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 茶葉對應茶具使用
- DB1308-T 390-2025 麒麟瓜設施栽培技術規程
- 兒童心臟疾病的診斷和治療進展
- 四川省眉山市仁壽縣鄉村學校(聯考)2024-2025學年七年級下學期6月期末地理試卷(含答案)
- 江西省萍鄉市2024-2025學年高一下學期4月期中考試政治試題(含答案)
- 小學科學手工活動方案
- 小熊電器活動方案
- 小班兒童區域活動方案
- 工地誠信宣講活動方案
- 山東博物館特色活動方案
- 病理生物安全管理制度
- 系統性紅斑狼瘡護理要點講課件
- 急性呼吸衰竭教學
- 土地執法知識課件
- 2025年護理管理學課程考試試題及答案
- 學習任務群下小學語文整本書閱讀的實踐研究
- 終端營銷實戰手冊
- 畢業設計(論文)-自動展開曬衣架設計
- 2025至2030中國汽車微電機行業發展趨勢分析與未來投資戰略咨詢研究報告
- 2025年內蒙古能源集團煤電板塊所屬單位招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 山東省菏澤市2023-2024學年高一下學期7月期末教學質量檢測政治試卷(含答案)
評論
0/150
提交評論