周超2021年9月Questions:WhatisCISG?WhatisCISG’ssphereofapplication?二、國際立法概述：

Case1AnAustriancompany,plaintiff,enteredintoacontractforthepurchaseandtransportofspiritstoRussiawiththeSwissbranchofacompanythathaditsheadquartersinLiechtenstein.Thecontractwasneverperformedbecauseadisputearoseamongthepartiesregardingthemodeoftransportandthefinaldateofperformance.TheAustrianbuyersuedtheSwisssellerforrepayment,whilethedefendantclaimeddamagesforbreachofcontract.Questions:WhetherCISGisapplicableforthiscase?1.SphereofApplication適用范圍

Article1

(1)ThisConventionappliestocontractsofsaleofgoodsbetweenpartieswhoseplacesofbusinessareindifferentStates:(a)whentheStatesareContractingStates;or(b)whentherulesofprivateinternationallawleadtotheapplicationofthelawofaContractingState.Article1(cont’d)(2)ThefactthatthepartieshavetheirplacesofbusinessindifferentStatesistobedisregardedwheneverthisfactdoesnotappeareitherfromthecontractorfromanydealingsbetween,orfrominformationdisclosedby,thepartiesatanytimebeforeorattheconclusionofthecontract.(3)NeitherthenationalityofthepartiesnorthecivilorcommercialcharacterofthepartiesorofthecontractistobetakenintoconsiderationindeterminingtheapplicationofthisConvention.2、貨物范圍Article2

Conventiondoesnotapplytosales:(a)ofgoodsboughtforpersonal,familyorhouseholduse,unlesstheseller,atanytimebeforeorattheconclusionofthecontract,neitherknewnoroughttohaveknownthatthegoodswereboughtforanysuchuse;(b)byauction;(c)onexecutionorotherwisebyauthorityoflaw;(d)ofstocks,shares,investmentsecurities,negotiableinstrumentsormoney;(e)ofships,vessels,hovercraftoraircraft;(f)ofelectricity.Article3

(1)Contractsforthesupplyofgoodstobemanufacturedorproducedaretobeconsideredsalesunlessthepartywhoordersthegoodsundertakestosupplyasubstantialpartofthematerialsnecessaryforsuchmanufactureorproduction.(2)ThisConventiondoesnotapplytocontractsinwhichthepreponderantpartoftheobligationsofthepartywhofurnishesthegoodsconsistsinthesupplyoflabourorotherservices.Article4

ThisConventiongovernsonlytheformationofthecontractofsaleandtherightsandobligationsofthesellerandthebuyerarisingfromsuchacontract.Inparticular,exceptasotherwiseexpresslyprovidedinthisConvention,itisnotconcernedwith:(a)thevalidityofthecontractorofanyofitsprovisionsorofanyusage;(b)theeffectwhichthecontractmayhaveonthepropertyinthegoodssold.Article5

ThisConventiondoesnotapplytotheliabilityofthesellerfordeathorpersonalinjurycausedbythegoodstoanyperson.Case2Thedefendants,twoSwisssellersofcomputersoftware,theplaintiff,aFrenchbuyer,andaskedforspecificperformanceofthesaleofsoftwarecontract,whichhadbeendeclaredavoidedbytheplaintiff.Question:whetherCISGisapplicable?P.S.TheCISGenteredintoforceinSwitzerlandon1March1991.Thecontractwasconcludedon21September1990.Thedisputearosein1May1991.例題1例題2例題3【2003年卷一多項選擇第66題】?聯合國國際貨物銷售合同公約?適用于以下哪些合同？A.營業地在不同締約國的當事人之間所訂立的貨物銷售合同B.住所地在不同締約國的當事人之間所訂立的貨物銷售合同C.具有不同締約國國籍的當事人之間所訂立的貨物銷售合同D.在國際私法規那么導致適用某一締約國法律的條件下，營業地在不同國家的當事人之間所訂立的貨物銷售合同3.?公約?的任意性4、我國參加?公約?時的保存

(1)合同形式的保存。我國堅持國際貨物銷售合同只能采取書面形式訂立，因而對公約第11條提出保存。(2)擴大適用的保存。我國堅持沖突標準指向的只能是實體法，不同意通過對國際私法的引用而使公約適用于非締約國，因而對公約第1條第〔1〕款〔b〕項提出保存。Case2思路案例4一家營業地在日本的公司同營業地在中國的服裝廠簽訂了銷售合同，由中國廠商向日本公司供給西裝1000套，但是西裝的布料和襯里等材料均由日本公司提供。現雙方發生合同糾紛，是否適用?公約?？公約參考JohnO.Honnold,UniformLawforInternationalSaleunderthe1980UnitedNationalConvention(1982)李巍著，?聯合國國際貨物銷售合同公約評釋?，法律出版社2002年版。UNIDROITPrinciplesofInternationalCommercialContractsDraftedin2004bytheInter