人際關系理論參考書目(2005)重點_第1頁
人際關系理論參考書目(2005)重點_第2頁
人際關系理論參考書目(2005)重點_第3頁
人際關系理論參考書目(2005)重點_第4頁
全文預覽已結束

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、人際關係理論參考書目(2005)A. Social Excha nge Theory(1) Foa, E. B. & Foa, U. G (1980). Resources theory: Interpersonal behavior as excha nge. In K. J. Gerge n et al. (Eds.)Social Excha nge Theoy (pp. 77-101). New York: Ple num Press 裕中(2, 3) Leve nthal, G S. (1976). The distributi on of rewards and resources

2、in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). NY: Academic Press 靜茹 Lerner, M. J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior(pp. 41-53). New York: P

3、le num.(5, 6) McClintock, C. G., Kramer, R. M., & Keil, L. J. (1984). Equity and social excha nge in huma n relati on ships. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Adva nces in Experimental Social Psychology(Vol. 17, pp. 184-228). NY: Academic Press.(7, 8) Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance mode

4、l of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Adva nces in Experime ntal Social PsychologVol. 21, pp. 181-227). NY: Academic Press|靖敏、欣怡B. Structure of Social Relati on ship*(1) Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four eleme ntary forms of social life: Framework for a uni fied theory of social relatio ns. Psych

5、ological Review, 99(4), 689-723 宜龍(2, 3)莊耀嘉、楊國樞(1997): 角色規範的認知結構。本土心理學研究,7期, 頁282-338。建華C. Culture and Relati on ships(1) Trian dis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differe nt culture con text. Psychological Review 93, 506-520,璽尹(2, 3) Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002

6、). RethinkingIndividualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumption and meta-a nalysis.Psychological Bulleti n, 128(1), 3-72.嘉妍、惠翎水 Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implicatio ns for cog niti on, emoti on, and motivati on. Psychological Review 98, 224-253,靖敏(5

7、) Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a un iversal n eed for positive self-regard?Psychological Review 106(4), 766-794. 家琦*(6) Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotio n, and well-be ing: Good feeli ngs in Japa n and the Un ited Stat

8、esCog niti on and Emotio n, 14(1), 93-124宜龍(7) Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehma n, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Diverge nt con seque nces of success and failure in Japa n and North America: An inv estigati on of self-improvi ng motivati ons and malleable selves.Jou

9、rnal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81,599-615.*(8) Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural min ds: A dyn amic con structivist approach to culture and cog niti on. American Psychologist, 55(7),709-720 欣怡*(8) Hong, Y. Y. & Chiu, C. Y. (2001). Toward a

10、paradigm shift: From cross-cultural differe nces in social cog niti on to social-cog nitive mediati on of cultural differe nces. Social Cog nitio n, 19(3), 181-196.欣怡D. Relational Orientation*(1) Ho, D. Y. F. (1991). Relational orientation and methodological relationalism. Bulletin of the Hong Kong

11、Psychological Society Nos. 26-27, 81-95.(2) Ho, D. (1998). I nterpers onal relati on ship and relati on ship dominan ce: An an alysis based on methodological relationalismAsian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1-16. 何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕(1991):關係取向:為中國社會心理方法論求答案。 見楊國樞、黃光國(主編)中國人的心理與行為(1989),頁49-66。臺北: 桂冠圖書

12、公司。(4, 5)楊國樞(1993): 中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦 (主編)中國人的心理與行為1992理念與方法篇,頁87-142。臺北: 桂冠圖書公司。(6, 7)黃光國(1988):人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。見黃光國(主編)中國 人的權力遊戲,頁7-55。臺北:巨流圖書公司。*(8) Hwang, K. K. (1997). Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. In tercultural com muni cati on studies, VII, 17-42.(9) Hwan

13、g, K. K. (2000). Chin ese relati on alism: Theoretical con structi on and methodological con siderati on s.Jo urnal for the Theory of Social Behavior; 30(2), 155-178.(10, 11)楊中芳(2000):人際關係與人際情感的構念化。本土心理學研究,12 期,頁 105-179。E. Self and Relati on ships(1) Samps on, E. E. (1985). The dece ntralizati on o

14、f ide ntity: Toward a revised con cept of pers onal and social orderAmerica n Psychologist; 36, 730-743.(1) Samps on, E. E. (1988). The debate on in dividualism: In dige nous psychologists of in dividual and their role in pers onal and societal fun cti onin g.America n Psychologist; 43, 15-22.(2) Ch

15、iu, Chi-yue. (1990). Effects of personality and performance on in-group favoritism among Hong Kong Chinese.Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 130(6), 841-843.(2) Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Miller, A. S. (1998). Collectivism and in-group bias. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), 315-328.(3) 李美枝 (

16、1993):從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限 。本 土心理學研究,1期,頁 267-300。(4, 5) 李美枝 (1994):內團體偏私的文化差異:中美大學生的比較 。見楊國樞、 余安邦(主編)中國人的心理與行為 1992文化、教化與病理篇 ,頁 121-164。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。F. Morality(1) Chiu, C. Y. (1991a). Hierarchical social relations and justice judgment among Hong Kong Chinese college students.Journal of Social Psy

17、chology, 131(6),885-887.(1) Chiu, C. Y. (1991b). Responses to injustices by Hong Kong Chinese college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(2),205-211.(2) Chiu, C. Y. (1991d). Role expectation as the principal criterion in justice judgment among Hong Kong Chinese studentsJ. ournal of Psycholog

18、y, 125(5),557-565.(2) Hong, Y. Y. & Chiu, C. Y. (1992). A study of the comparative structure of guilt and shame in a Chinese societyJ.ournal of Psychology, 126(2), 171-179.(3) Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y. Y., & Fu, J. H. Y. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of

19、Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923-940.(4) Hong, Y. Y., Ip, G., Chiu, C. Y., Morris, M. W., & Menon, T. (2001). Cultural identity and dynamic construction of the self: Collective duties and individual rights in Chinese and American cultures.Social Cognition, 19(3), 251-268.(5) Miller, J.

20、G., Bersoff, D. M., & Hartwood, R. I. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 33-47.(6) Miller, J. G. & Bersoff, D. M. (1992). Culture and moral judgments: How are confl

21、icts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 541-554.(7) Miller, J. G. (1991). A cultural perspective on the morality of beneficence and interpersonal responsibility. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Cross-cultural Inte

22、rpersonal Communication (pp. 11-27). Newburg Park, CA: Sage.*(8) Miller, J. G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the morality of caring: Individuality oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codesC.ross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 28(1), 3-39.(9) Miller, J. G. &

23、Bersoff, D. M. (1995). Development in the context of everyday family relationship: Culture, interpersonal morality, and adaptation. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds.), Morality in Everyday Life (pp. 259-282). New York: Cambridge University Press.(10, 11) Shweder, R. A. et al. (1997). The“big three”of mor

24、ality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three”explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt et al. (Eds.)Morality and Health (pp. 119-169). New York, NY: Routledge.(12, 13) 黃光國 (1998):兩種道德:臺灣社會中道德思維研究的再詮釋 。本土心 理學研究,9 期,頁 121-175。G. Choice and Dependence(1) Iyengar, S. S. & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspe

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論