1、中國男籃論文：因子分析評(píng)價(jià)體系運(yùn)用于中國男籃綜合實(shí)力 評(píng)估的研究【中文摘要】2010 年第 16 屆世錦賽已經(jīng)過去，中國男籃的成績 依然沒有獲得突破性的進(jìn)展。幸運(yùn)的搭上了末班車進(jìn)入了16 強(qiáng)。中國男籃的總體實(shí)力水平與世界一流隊(duì)伍仍然存在著很大的差距。為了能更加準(zhǔn)確的反應(yīng)一直球隊(duì)的綜合實(shí)力以及科學(xué)的給中國男籃進(jìn)行 定位。本文運(yùn)用了多元統(tǒng)計(jì)的分析方法，首先用聚類分析對參加比賽 的所有隊(duì)伍進(jìn)行分層分析，然后運(yùn)用因子分析法對球隊(duì)各個(gè)位置的隊(duì) 員重要素質(zhì)進(jìn)行篩選，得出優(yōu)秀隊(duì)員應(yīng)該具有的素質(zhì)。從更全面的方 向?qū)σ恢蜿?duì)的比賽能力進(jìn)行分析。通過對球隊(duì)綜合實(shí)力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的 研究,對比世界一流隊(duì)伍與中國隊(duì)之間的差

2、距。 研究結(jié)果表明：中國隊(duì) 本屆比賽獲得的成績存在很大偶然性，通過聚類結(jié)果可以得出，中國 隊(duì) 17 項(xiàng)數(shù)據(jù)表現(xiàn)出來的分層排名在 20 名以后。因子分析的結(jié)果表明，中國隊(duì)后衛(wèi)線 3 分能力已經(jīng)不弱于一流隊(duì)伍，籃板球能力不弱，但是 相對于中國隊(duì)后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員的身高來說，中國隊(duì)后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員并沒有發(fā)揮好自 己的身高優(yōu)勢，在籃板能力上表現(xiàn)的更加強(qiáng)勢。助攻少仍然是中國隊(duì) 輸球的主要因素，但是研究表明中國隊(duì)后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員的送出助攻數(shù)少但是 差異并不顯著，造成更大差異的原因是中國隊(duì)其他隊(duì)員在接到可以直 接攻擊籃筐的機(jī)會(huì)時(shí)，對機(jī)會(huì)的把握能力偏弱。前鋒線等分能力差，主要差距在前鋒隊(duì)員的 3 分球能力，經(jīng)歷了中鋒時(shí)代的中國隊(duì)前鋒線

3、 基本喪失了 3 分攻擊的能力；其他各個(gè)指標(biāo)均差異不大。中國隊(duì)前鋒線的后備力量不足，主力與替補(bǔ)隊(duì)員的能力存在很大差異【英文摘要】16th World Champio nship 2010 is over, theChin ese men s basketball results still did not get a breakthrough. Luckyto catch the last bus into the 16. The level of the overall strength of theChinese Basketball team with world-class large

4、 gap still exists. In order tobe more accurate response has been the team s overall strength andscientific positioning the Chinese men s basketball. This paper uses amultivariate statistical an alysis method, first used cluster analysis on allthe race teams of stratifiedanalysis,and thenuse factor a

5、nalysis on the location of the team membersin all the important quality of scree ning, should have obta ined good quality players . Thedirecti on of a more comprehe nsive ability of a team to an alyze thegame.Overall stre ngth of the team through the evaluatio n of theresearch, compared to aworld-cl

6、ass team and the gap betwee n the Chinese team. The results show that: the Chi nese team tour name nt there isa big chanee the results obtained through the clustering results can bedrawn, the Chinese team of 17 data shown in the hierarchical ranking of20 after. Factor analysis results showed that th

7、eChinese guards line capacity has not weaker than 3-class team, rebounding ability is not weak, but compared to the height of the Chineseteam for the Guards, Guards in the Chinese team did not play a goodadva ntage of their height , in rebo unding onthe performanee of the more powerful. Fewer assist

8、s losing the Chineseteam is still the main factor, but studies show thatthe Chin ese team in assists Guard sent a small but thedifferenee is not signifieant,resultingin greater reason forthe differenee is in receipt of other members of the Chinese team canattack the basket opport un ities, weak capa

9、city to grasp the opport uni ty.Equal poor forward line, the main gap in the forward capacity of membersof the 3-po int shot, theChinese team lost the forward line 3 basic ability to attack;various other in dicators are not sig nifica ntly differe nt.China s reserve team forward line lack of significantdiffere nces betwee n the mai n and reserve.【關(guān)鍵詞】中國男籃 16 屆世錦賽 多元統(tǒng)計(jì) 綜合實(shí)力【備注】索購全文在線加好友色:139938848