Design-for-reliability介紹教學(xué)課件_第1頁(yè)
Design-for-reliability介紹教學(xué)課件_第2頁(yè)
Design-for-reliability介紹教學(xué)課件_第3頁(yè)
Design-for-reliability介紹教學(xué)課件_第4頁(yè)
Design-for-reliability介紹教學(xué)課件_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩37頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

DesignForReliability

Chapter12GregClowserJessicaTeachworthSoniaRochaCastilloBillyQuachWilliamLeeChadKendrickEngr202-Cohort9October2,2006Chapter12OutlineDefinitionofReliability-WilliamMeasuresofReliability-GregRedundancyinDesign-ChadFailureModeEffectsandCriticalityAnalysis–JessicaFaultTreeAnalysisandStress-Strength-SoniaExample–BillyWilliamLeeReliabilityTheabilityofasystemtoperformitsintendedmissionwhenoperatingforadesignatedperiodoftime,orthroughaplannedmissionscenario(orseriesofscenarios),inarealisticoperationalenvironmentFourinherentsubdefinitionsspringfromthis:ProbabilitySatisfactoryPerformanceTimeormission-relatedcycleSpecifiedOperatingConditionsWilliamLeeWilliamLeeProbabilityAquantitativevaluethatspecifiesaroughestimateofhowmanytimesasystemwillperforminagivennumberoftrialsMicrosofthasa“5nines”guaranteeWilliamLeeSatisfactoryPerformance

TheabilityreproducibilityofasystemtoreachorexceedthetechnicalperformancemeasuresitwasdesignedtoachieveImportantinhighvolumeproductionWilliamLeeTimeorMission-relatedcycle

Timeisameasureagainstwhichthedegreeofsystemperformancecanberelated.Missionrelatedcycleistheoperatingtime-tableforactualoperation.Commonmeasurementsoftimeare:MeanTimeBeforeFailure(MTBF)MeanTimeToFailure(MTTF)WilliamLeeSpecifiedoperatingconditions

EnvironmentalfactorsGeographicallocationwherethesystemisexpectedtooperateAnticipatedperiodoftimeOperationalprofilePotentialimpactsresultingfromtemperaturecycling,humidity,vibrationandshockCommonlyoverlookedistransportationMeasuresofReliabilityR(t):TheReliabilityFunction

TheProbabilitythatthesystemwillbesuccessfulforsomespecifiedtime.R(t)=1-F(t):TheFailureDistributionFunction:TheProbabilitythatasystemwillfailbytimet.F(t)GregClowserMeasuresofReliabilityR(t):TheReliabilityFunctionIftherandomvariablethasadensityfunctionf(t)thenthereliabilityfunctioncanberepresentedby:R(t)=f(t)dtf(t)Iff(t)hasanexponentialdistributionthenthereliabilityfunctionisnow:

R(t)=dt=MeanLifeofthesystem=MTBF=1/λGregClowserMeasuresofReliabilityR(t):TheReliabilityFunctionThefinalReliabilityFunctionforanexponentialdistributionis:R(t)Thiscurveshowshowasystemwillbecomemoreunreliableastimeprogresses.GregClowserMeasuresofReliabilityTheFailureRate(λ)Therateatwhichfailuresoccurinaspecifiedtimeinterval.GregClowserMeasuresofReliabilityTheFailureRate(λ)Therateatwhichfailuresoccurinaspecifiedtimeinterval.FailureRateinitiallydecreasesasthesystemisdebugged.Failuresoccurmoreoftenasthesystemwearsout.NormalOperationSystemWear-outInitialDebuggingBathtubCurveGregClowserRedundancyinDesignFigure12.9ParallelNetworkwiththreecomponentsParallelNetworksProperties:Morethanoneofthesamecomponentsareinparallel.AllthecomponentsmustfailtocauseatotalSystemfailure.Reliabilityis1-(Pfail,n)ChadKendrickRedundancyinDesignParallelredundantnetworksareusedprimarilytoimprovesystemreliability.

AseriessystemPfail,n=0.05 Reliability=(0.95)3=0.8574 AparallelsystemPfail,n=0.05 Reliability=1-(0.05)3=0.9999ChadKendrickRedundancyinDesignAttheSubsystemlevelitmaybeappropriatetoaddparallelfunctionalcapabilities. i.e.incorporatingelectrical,digitalandmechanicalalternativesforaircraftflightcontrolAtthePiece-Partlevelitmaybeappropriatetoincorporateredundancywheremaintenancewouldnotbedesirable. i.e.redundancyinacircuitboardChadKendrickRedundancyinDesignRedundancydoesnotimprovereliabilitydirectly.Normallydoesnotsolveallproblemsasitoftenincreasesweight,spaceandpowerconsumption,hasgreatercomplexityandhighercosts.ButitmaybeonlywaytomeetsystemreliabilityChadKendrickRedundancyinDesignQuestionsforincorporatingRedundancy:Isitreallyrequiredintermsofsystemcriticalitytooperationandaccomplishmentofmission?Atwhatlevelshouldredundancybeincorporated?Shouldmaintainabilitybeconsideredinstead?Aretherealternatemethodsforimprovingreliability?(i.e.partselection,use,etc)ChadKendrickReliabilityAnalysisMethodsFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)Fault-TreeAnalysis(FTA)Stress-StrengthAnalysisJessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)DesigntechniquetoIdentifyandInvestigatePotentialSystemWeaknessesAlsoapplicabletoProduct/ProcessEvaluationAnalysiscanbeappliedatallstagesofthedesignprocessCanimpact“Before-the-fact”enhancementsinsystemdesignCanbeused“After-the-fact”toevaluateandimproveexistingsystemsonacontinuousbasisExampleReportingFormat–Fig12.21,pg.402JessicaTeachworthFMECAProcess(Fig.12.17)JessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)DefineSystem(productorprocess)RequirementsDescribethesystem,theexpectedoutcomes,andtherelevanttechnicalperformancemeasures(TPMs).AccomplishFunctionalAnalysisDefinetheSysteminFunctionalTermsFigure12.18(Pg.397)JessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)AccomplishRequirementsAllocationTop-DownbreakoutofSystem-LevelRequirements(RecallSection4.3)IdentifyFailureModesA“FailureMode”isthemannerinwhichasystemelementdoesnotaccomplishitsfunction.Examples:apipemayrupture,aswitchwon’tworkJessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)DetermineCausesofFailureAnalyzetheprocessorproducttodetermineactualcausesforwhyfailureoccurred.Fig.12.19(pg.398)Cause-and-Effect“Fishbone”DiagramJessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)DeterminetheEffectsofFailureConsiderhowthefailureofoneelementsaffectseverythingelse.IdentifyFailureDetectionMeansIfProcess-Oriented:ReferstoProcessControlsthatmaydetecttheoccurrenceoffailuresordefectsIfDesignFocused:ReferstoExistenceofanydesignfeatures,aids,evaluationprocedures,etc.thatwillresultinthedetectionofpotentialfailures.JessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)RateFailureModeSeverityIffailureoccurs,howseriousistheimpact?RateFailureModeFrequencyGiventhevarietyofpotentialfailuremodesforanelement,howlikelyisfailure?RatingDefinitionforSeverityDefinitionforFrequency1MinorEffectsRemoteChance(Unlikely)2to3LowEffectsLowChance(Veryfew)4to6ModerateEffectsModerate(Occasionally)7to8HighEffectsHigh(RepeatedFailures)9to10VeryHighVeryHigh(Failureisinevitable)JessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)RateFailureModeDetectionProbabilityPertainstotheProbabilityafailureordefectswillbeidentifiedbeforemajorsystemcatastropheAlsoarankingforcurrentprocesscontrolsRatingDefiintionforDetectionProbability1to2VeryHighRateofDetection3to4HighRateofDetection5to6ModerateRateofDetection7to8LowRateofDetection9VeryLowRateofDetection10AbsoluteCertaintyofNon-DetectionJessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)AnalyzeFailureModeCriticalityObjectiveistoconsolidateinformationtoidentifythemorecriticalsystemelementsFailurecriticallyisafunctionofseverity,frequency,andprobabilityofdetectionasaRiskPriorityNumber(RPN)RPN=(severity)x(frequency)x(probabilityofdetection)JessicaTeachworthFailureMode,Effects,andCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)InitiateRecommendationsforProduct/ProcessImprovementThisistheiterativefeedbackprocessofidentifyingareaswithhighRPNsandevaluatingthecauses,andthesubsequentinitationofrecommendationsforproduct/processimprovement.(Fig.12.17)JessicaTeachworthSoniaCastilloFault-TreeAnalysis(FTA)FMECAisabottom-upapproachestoreliabilityanalysis.FTAistop-downthoughtprocessthatallowsforqualitativeandquantitativeanalysis.FTAisagraphicalrepresentationofeventsthatmightleadtofailure.SeeFigure12.22,page403SoniaCastilloFault-TreeAnalysis(FTA)GenericFault-Tree

AnalysisStepsare:

Definethe“top”or“primary”event.Thisisthefailureconditionunderstudy.Determineelements/causesoftop-levelevent.Determineprobabilitiesforeachoftheelements.Studythesystemtoseehowthevariouselementsrelatetooneanotherandtotheprimaryevent.SoniaCastilloFault-TreeAnalysis(FTA)GenericFault-Tree

AnalysisSteps:

Constructthefault

tree,startingwiththeprimaryeventandworkingdownward.Analyzethefault

treetoidentifywaysofeliminatingeventsthatleadtofailure.Prepareacorrectiveactionandcontingencyplansforpreventingand/ordealingwithfailures.Implementtheplans.SoniaCastilloFault-TreeAnalysiscontinued…TopLevelEventIntermediatefaultLowest-levelfaultUndevelopedeventInputEventANDlogicgateORlogicgateSoniaCastilloStress-StrengthThestress-strengthofcomponentsisamajorreliabilityconcern.Componentsaredesignedtooperateinnormalconditions.AdditionalstressesbeyonddesigncapabilitycanleadtounexpectedfailuresTemperatureHumidityVibration LoadsSoniaCastilloStress-StrengthAnalysisStress-strengthanalysissteps:Determinestressesasafunctionofloads,temp,vibration,time,etc.IdentifyfactorsaffectingmaximumstressIdentifyCRITICALstresscomponentsCalculatemeanstressesShearstressMaxtensilestressSoniaCastilloStress-StrengthAnalysisCont..Stress-strengthanalysissteps:DeterminecriticalstressdistributionAnalyzeparametersIdentifycomponentsafetymarginsTakecorrectiveactionComponentsubstitutionRedesignofsystemelementLSESystemReliabilityImportance?MandatesforLoadServingEntitiesNorthernAmericanElectricReliabilityCouncil(NERC)WesternElectricityCoordinatingCou

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論