Capgemini-訂閱模式的興起:卡車所有權的革命性變革(英)_第1頁
Capgemini-訂閱模式的興起:卡車所有權的革命性變革(英)_第2頁
Capgemini-訂閱模式的興起:卡車所有權的革命性變革(英)_第3頁
Capgemini-訂閱模式的興起:卡車所有權的革命性變革(英)_第4頁
Capgemini-訂閱模式的興起:卡車所有權的革命性變革(英)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩35頁未讀, 繼續免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

TheRiseofSubscriptionModels:RevolutionizingTruckOwnership

Exploringthebenefitsandacceptanceofflexiblefleetsolutions

Executivesummary

Arecentsurveyoftruckcustomers

conductedbyCapgeminisupports

majortruckOEMs’existingbeliefs

andexpectationsforsubscription

models,particularlythoserelating

toelectricvehicles.Theresearchalso

addsimportantinsights,forexample

thatmanycustomerswouldprefer

toobtainsubscriptionsdirectlyfrom

manufacturers,andthatsubscriptionscouldhelptoovercometheperceptionthatelectricvehiclesarenotaffordable.Inthisreport,wecommentonthe

resultsandproposeactionsthattruckOEMsshouldbeinitiatingnow,suchascreatingastrategytoaddresskeycustomerconcerns,andinforming

customersbetteronissueslikethe

respectivetotalcostofownership/useforconventionalandelectrictrucks.

2TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

Contents

Introduction5

Researchmethod6

Summaryoffindings7

Findingspart1:marketacceptabilityofthesubscriptionmodel7

Findingspart2:marketreadinessforcommercialelectricvehicles12

Discussionandrecommendations15

HowCapgeminihelpsclients17

implementsubscriptionmodels

Authors19

3

“Inthepassengercarsector,wecan

alreadyobservethatmovingfromICE

vehiclestoEVsisassociatedwithamovefromownershiptousage–implyingthatsubscriptionmodelswillbecomemore

popular.Ournewstudysuggeststhat

thistrendcouldbeevenmoresignificantfortrucks,partlybecauseofaffordabilityissuesbutalsobecauseofuncertainty

aboutEVsandtheirimpactonresidual

values.Thestudyalsopointstothe

potentialofsubscriptionstoaccelerate

uptakeofzero-emissionvehicles.This

findingshouldgeneratefurtherdiscussion

andapossiblerethinkofcurrentapproachestopromotingEVs.”

LaurenceNo?l

HeadofGlobalAutomotiveIndustryCapgemini

4TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

Introduction

Majortruckmanufacturersareactivelyexploringnewownershipmodels,includingsubscriptionmodels.Inthesemodels,customerspayforthe

useoftruckswhilethemanufacturerorotherserviceproviderretainsownershipoftheassets.Therearevariantswherecustomerstake

ownershipofthevehiclesbutobtainbatteriesonasubscriptionbasis.

However,thereisalackofharddataaboutthelevelsofacceptanceforthemodelsamongtruckcustomers,andaboutcustomerexpectationsandpreferences.

Toshedlightonthesequestions,Capgeminirecentlyconductedasurveywhichexploredtheacceptabilitytotruckcustomersofsubscription

services,alongwithrelatedissuessuchaswillingnesstopayapremium,andwhichservicesshouldbeincludedinthesubscriptionmodel.

Wealsoinvestigatedourrespondents’preferencesforelectricvehicles

(EVs)versusinternalcombustionengine(ICE)vehiclesandusedtheresultstohelpusinterpretthefindingsaboutsubscriptions1.Wediscoveredsomeinterestingdifferencesbetweenthepreferencesofthesetwogroupswithrespecttosubscriptions.

Overall,thefindingsconfirmwhatwealreadyknewaboutsubscriptionsforcommercialvehicles,andsomajorOEMswhohavealreadygoneaheadin

thisareacanbeassuredthattheyarebroadlypursuingtherightstrategies.Butwealsomadesomesurprisingandpotentiallyhelpfuldiscoveries,whichwarrantfurtherinvestigation.

Thisreportoutlinesandcommentsonourresults,beforemakingsomerecommendationsforfurtherresearchandactions.

1.Pleasenotethatinthisreportweusetheterm“EVs”tocoverbothbatteryelectric

vehicles(BEVs)andhydrogenfuelcellelectricvehicles(FCEVs),unlessotherwisestated.

5

Researchmethod

NinetyrespondentsfromtruckcustomersinGermany,allofwhomwereascertainedtohaveastrong

engagementinthismarket,tookpartinthisonline

survey(Figure1).WedecidedtoresearchGermany

initiallybecausethismarketisespeciallyreceptiveto

newsalesmodelsandhasastrongimpetustomove

tozeroemissions.InthefuturewearekeentoexpandthisresearchtocoverthewholeofEurope,andperhapsNorthAmericaandChina.

Figure1:Backgroundtothesurvey

Surveyobjective

Theprimaryobjectiveofthesurveywastogatherdataontheacceptanceand

preferredimplementationofthetrucksubscriptionmodelintheGermanmarketanditsreadinesstouseelectricvehicles.

Surveyscope

andrespondents

Respondents’country

Numberofrespondents

90

Useofthefollowing

inrespondents'companies

?Heavyvehicles

?Bigbuses

?Tractors

?Specialvehicles

6TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

7

Summaryof

findings

Findingspart1:marketacceptabilityofthesubscriptionmodel

First,weexploredourrespondents’generalviewsonthesubscriptionmodel,andwhattheythinktheadvantagesanddisadvantagesfortheircompaniesare.

Perceivedadvantagesanddisadvantagesofsubscriptionmodels

Figure2:Reasonsforacceptanceofsubscriptionmodelsfortrucks

20%

Betterabilitytoplanexpensesduetoshortercommitmentperiods

25%

Abilitytotestaparticularvehiclemodel(e.g.anEV)overalongerperiodoftime

42%

Flexibilitytoabsorbshort-termcapacitypeaks

Thebiggestreasonforwantingtoadoptthe

subscriptionmodelistogaintheflexibilitytoabsorb

short-termcapacitypeaks(atechniquecalled“peak

shaving”),mentionedby42%ofrespondents(Figure

2).Thisfindingreflectsthefactthattheirbusinesses

habituallyfacefluctuatingdemand–perhapsmorethanusualgivencurrentlevelsofeconomicuncertaintyanddisruption,particularlytothesupplychain.Peakshavingisalsoanimportanttoolfordealingwithseasonal

demand,forexampleintherun-uptoChristmas.

Otherreasonsforacceptanceincludethedesiretotryoutspecificvehiclemodels,whichprobablyreflects

aninterestinexperimentingwithnewtechnologieswithoutlong-termcommitments.Themodelisalso

seenasusefulforplanningexpenditure,thankstotheshortercommitmentperiodsinvolved.

Whenaskedabouttheirreservationssurrounding

subscriptionmodels,respondentsoftenmentionthe

perceptionthatsubscriptionsareassociatedwith

highcosts–afindingthatreflectsthismarket’spricesensitivity(Figure3).

Tofindoutmore,theresearchinvestigatedhowlargeapremiumcompaniesarepreparedtopayforasubscriptionmodeloveralong-termlease,

Figure3:Objectionstosubscriptionmodelsfortrucks

25%

Complexityinprocessing/

62%

administrationHighcosts

andanalyzedtheresultsaccordingtowhetherthe

respondentisconsideringEVsornot.AsFigure12

shows,amajorityofrespondentsareconsideringEVs,atleasttosomeextent.

Interestingly,potentialEVcustomersarewillingto

paya10-15%premium,whereasthosewhopreferICEvehiclesareonlypreparedtopay5-10%(Figure4).

Figure4:Howmuchpremiumarerespondentswillingtopayforasubscriptionmodel?

15%

RespondentsconsideringEVuse

5%

RespondentsNOTconsideringEVuse

Asanotherpotentialobjectiontosubscriptions,respondentsalsomentioncomplexityof

administration,suggestingthattheydonotyet

associatesubscriptionswiththestraightforward,user-friendlymodelsthattheyprefer.

Preferredapplicationsforthesubscriptionmodel

Wealsotookamoredetailedlookathowrespondentsenvisageusingsubscriptionmodelswithintheir

businesses,withrespecttotheclassofvehicle,range

Around53%ofrespondentsareconsideringintegrating

BatteryElectricVehicles

(BEV)andFuelCellElectric

Vehicles(FCEV)intotheir

fleets.Thisgrowinginterestineco-friendlyoptionsis

accompaniedbyareadinesstoinvestinpremiumservices.ThoseconsideringEVsof

eithertypearewillingto

paya15%premiumfora

subscriptionmodel,whereasotherswillpayjust5%

premium.

overwhichtouseit,andsubscriptionperiod.WeagaincomparedtheresponsesforthoseconsideringEVs

versustherest.

Figure5:Optimalvehicleclassforsubscriptions

RespondentsconsideringEVuse·RespondentsNOTconsideringEVuse

Veryheavytrucks

HeavytrucksMedium-dutytrucks

LighttrucksLightcommercialtrucks

22%13%

19%21%15%

21%

Veryheavytrucks

25%

29%

29%

HeavytrucksMedium-dutytrucks

26%

LighttrucksLightcommercialtrucks

8TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

AsshowninFigure5,respondentsconsideringEVs

optforlighttomedium-dutytrucksbecausethey

haveenoughpositiveexperienceandknowledgeto

integratethosetrucksintotheirdailyschedulesand

routes.ThosepreferringICEvehiclesaremorelikely

inthelong-haulbusiness;thisexplainstheirdifferent

viewsregardingvehicleclassessuitableforsubscriptionmodels.Overall,heavytrucksareslightlylessfavoredcandidatesforsubscriptions,possiblyduetotheir

highercostsorspecificusagepatterns.Thisresponsemightalsobeduetothefactthatplanningtheusageoflong-haultrucksisofteneasierforcompaniesthanplanningmorelocalactivities,andsotheyarenot

lookingforabetterwaytodoit.

Questionedaboutthedistancerangeswherethey

wouldbelikelytoadoptsubscriptionmodels,

respondentsindicatethatthesemodelsareapplicableacrosslocal(upto50km),regional(51-150km),andlong-distance(151km+)ranges,withregionalusagelikelytobehighest(Figure7).Thissuggeststhattheflexibilityofsubscriptionscouldberelevanttoarangeofbusiness

needs,fromlocaldeliveriestolong-haultransportation.

Figure6:Preferreddistancerangesforadoptionofsubscriptionmodels

30%28%

LongdistanceLocalarea

42%

Regionalarea

Takentogether,thisandthepreviousfindingmay

implythatsubscriptiontrucksareseenasmostusefulforthetrafficbetweenregionaldepotsandtheend-

customeror(insomecases)localhubs.Itisgenerally

known–andconfirmedbythird-partyresearch–thattruckcustomersenvisagesimilarapplicationsforEVs,suggestingsynergiesbetweensubscriptionmodelsandelectrictrucks.

Whenitcomestocommitmentperiods,respondentsdemonstrateapreferenceforathree-monthperiod(Figure7).Thisfindingsuggeststhatbusinessesvalueshort-termcommitmentsforbetteradaptabilityandfinancialplanning.

Figure7:Preferredperiodforwhichtocommittoasubscription

15%

12

1%

9

24%

6

32%

3

7%

2

11%

1

Wefindthisresultslightlysurprisingaswewould

expectrespondentstopreferashortercommitmentperiodformaximumflexibility,especiallyinthelightofthedesireforpeakshaving.

Months

ThewillingnessofrespondentsconsideringEVstopaya

significantpremiumfor

subscriptionsindicatesarobustmarketpotentialforthismodel

amongfleetoperatorsprioritizingsustainabilityandinnovation.

9

Preferencesfordeliveryofthesubscriptionmodel

Next,weaskedformoredetailabouthowcompanieswouldliketoobtaintrucksubscriptions–including

whotheywouldliketoprovidethesubscriptions,

whethertheypreferafixedoraflexibleoffer,andtheirexpectationsaboutleadtimes.Wealsodiscussedwhattypeofenginetheywouldbelookingforinavehicle

obtainedbysubscription.

Figure8:Whoshouldofferthesubscriptionmodel?

Newsupplier,e.g.start-up

LeasingcompanywithwhichIdonothaveabusinessrelationshipyet

LeasingcompanywithwhichIalreadyhaveabusinessrelationship

Manufacturer

6%

11%

21%

49%

Interestingly,respondentsshowamarked

preferenceforobtainingsubscriptionsdirectlyfrom

manufacturers,with49%choosingthisoption(Figure8).Leasingcompaniesandnewsuppliersbothranksomewaybehindmanufacturers.

Formanufacturers,thispreferenceisaheartening

finding,andnotjustbecauseitlikelyindicatestrustinOEMs’establishedqualityandservicestandards.Italsoopensuppossibilitiesforfuturerevenuestreams.

Theseideashaveautomotivesustainabilitybenefitsaswellascommercialones,andwe’llreturntothemlater.

Slightlymorethanhalfofrespondentspreferaflexibleofferwithselectablemodulestoafixedone(Figure9).

Figure9:Shouldcustomersbeabletochoosedifferentmoduleswithinthesubscriptionmodel?

54%46%

Fixedo?erwith

prede?nedservicemodels

Flexibleo?erwithfreelyselectablemodules

Thispreferencealignswiththedesireforcustomizable,adaptablesolutions,seeninallsectorsoftoday’s

automotiveindustry.

10TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

11

Figure10:Mostexpectedcomponentsinasubscriptionoffer

Maintenanceand

wearandtear

Insurance

24/7customerservice

Whenrespondentsareaskedwhichspecific

componentscompanieswouldliketoseeincludedin

theoffer,maintenanceandmakinggoodwearandteararethefirstchoice,followedbyinsurance,andthen

24/7customerservice(Figure10).

Whenitcomestoexpectationsabouttheleadtimefordeliveryofavehicleiftheytakeoutasubscription,themajoritypreferaleadtimeoflessthan1week(30%)tolessthan4weeks(24%).Thisindicatestheimportanceofquickserviceandhighvehicleavailabilitywhen

planningasubscription-basedoperation.

Wenowcometotheimportantquestionofwhatformofenginerespondentswouldchooseinrelationto

subscriptions.

Figure11:Preferreddrivetrainsforsubscriptions

28%

Pureelectric

42%

Diesel

9%

21%

Gasoline

Hybriddrive

Dieselaccountsforthehighestshareoftheresponses(42%overall),probablyreflectingitscurrentdominanceandampleinfrastructuresupportratherthanany

entrenchedpreference(Figure11).

Infact,pureelectricandhybridmodelstogetherarechosenbyevenmorerespondents(49%),suggestingconcernaboutenvironmentalconsiderationsand

opennesstonewtechnologies.(And,ifweconsideronlythelargestcompanies’responses,pureelectricemergesasthemostpopularoption.)

Theseresultspaintanencouragingpictureofthe

prospectsforelectrification.Theproportionof

respondentspreferringpureelectric–28%–might

seemlowatfirstsight,butitissignificantlymorethanpureelectric’sshareofthecurrentfleetinGermany.

Pureelectricandhybridmodels

togetherattract49%of

respondents,reflectinggrowingenvironmentalconcernsand

interestinnewtechnologies.Amongthelargestcompanies,pureelectricvehiclesarethemostpopular.

Findingspart2:marketreadinessforcommercialelectricvehicles

Respondents’interestinelectricvehicles

Aswehavejustseen,ourresearchrevealsencouraginglevelsofinterestinelectricorhybridvehiclesinthe

contextofasubscriptionmodel.Thenextsegment

ofourresearchprobesthisinterestfurther,byasking

abouttheextenttowhichorganizationsareconsideringEVsandwhattheyseeasthemainadvantagesand

barriersassociatedwithelectrification.

Figure12:AmajorityofrespondentsarealreadyconsideringtheuseofEVsintheirfleets

22%

40%

Notconsideringatall

Somewhatconsidering

13%

25%

StronglyconsideringNotconsideringmuch

Whenquestionedinthisslightlydifferentway,asmanyas22%ofrespondentssaytheyhavenotconsidered

electrificationatall,while25%haveonlyconsidereditalittle(Figure12).Thisseemsratherdisappointinggiventhemanyreasonstoconsiderit,including

environmentalconcerns,regulatorypressures,andadvancementsinEVtechnology.

Askedabouttheadvantagesofelectrification,manyrespondentsemphasizelocalemission-freeoperationandimprovedimage,highlightingenvironmentalandsocialresponsibilityconsiderations(Figure13).

Figure13:PerceivedadvantagesofusingEVs

Locallyemission-free,especiallyinurbanareas.

Improvedimageduetotheuseofenvironmentallyfriendlycommercialvehicles.

Mediaattentionandadvertisinge?ectivenessasaperceived?rstmover.

11%

8%

25%

12TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

Figure14:PerceiveddisadvantagesofusingEVs

Lowrange

Highacquisitioncosts Longidletimes(chargingtimes)Lowerpayload(duetobatteryweight)Highelectricitycosts

Highmaintenancecosts

33%

28%

18%

4%

37%

37%

Highacquisitioncostsandrangeanxietyremain

significantbarrierstoEVadoption,alongwithconcernsaboutchargingtimesandpayloadcapacity(Figure14).

Drillingdownintothedatauncoverssomeinterestinganglesonthisfinding.Forexample,ifwelookonlyat

respondentswhoareactivelyconsideringEVs,then

highercostsareabiggerconcernthanrange,whereasthosewhoarenotconsideringEVsaremoreconcerned

aboutrangethancost.Thissuggeststhatmore

knowledgeaboutEVs,includingtheiradvantagesandchallenges,leadstogreateracceptance.

Itisalsoworthnotingthatconcernsaboutacquisitioncostscouldbeusedtoargueforthesubscription

model.Indeed,Capgeminiresearchforvarious

commercialvehicleclientssuggeststhat,withbroad

usageofaholisticecosystemofservicesaugmentingtheEVtruck,thetotalcostofuse(TCU)couldbemuchlowerforEVsthanforconventionalICEvehicles.ThisobservationcouldhelpOEMstosellbothEVsand

subscriptionmodels.

13

GainingacceptanceforEVs

Finally,weaskedthoserespondentswhoare

consideringEVsaboutfactorsthatwillsecuretheir

acceptance,andspecificallyabouthowtheyprefertopayforcharging(flatrateversuspaymentperkWh).

Whenchoosingfactorsthatwouldsecuretheir

acceptanceofEVs,respondentstendtoemphasize

rangeandprice,suggestingthatpracticalityandcost-

effectivenessarekeytowideradoption(Figure15).

However,inbothcasesthepicturemayalreadybemorepositivethancompaniesrealize,soaswe’lldiscusslater,OEMsmayneedtoputmoreeffortintoinformingtheircustomers.

Figure15:MostimportantfactorsthatwouldconvincerespondentstouseEVs

Range

Price

PayloadCharginginfrastructure Chargingspeed PerformanceSustainability

TCO/TCU

13%

7%6%

4%

2%2%2%

21%

Chargingforenergy

Overall,numbersaresplitalmostequallybetween

RespondentswhoareinterestedinEVsfavorseparate

wantingtopayforelectricityaspartoftheusagefee

chargingforenergyconsumption,whereasthosewho

orbeingbilledseparatelyforit.Butaninteresting

wanttostaywithconventionalICEvehiclespreferanall-

pictureemergesfromanalyzingtheresultsaccordingtowhethertherespondentsareconsideringEVsorpreferICEvehicles.

inclusivesubscriptionthatincludesenergycosts(Figure16).

ig

Figure16:Shouldchargingbebilledseparatelyorincludedinthesubscriptionfee?

RespondentsconsideringtheuseofEVsRespondentsNOTconsideringtheuseofEVs

All-inclusivechargingcardwhereelectricityisincludedintheusagefee

Chargingcardthatisbilledandpaidforseparately

26%

21%

18%

30%

14TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

15

Discussionand

recommendations

Subscriptionmodelspresentimportant

opportunitiesforcommercialvehicleOEMs

TheseresultstellusthatthemajorityoftransportationcompaniestrustOEMsoverotherstoprovidethem

withasubscriptionmodel.Offeringsubscriptionscanthereforebeanexcellentstrategyformaximizingtrucksales.

Themodelpresentsarangeofadditionalopportunities,forexample:

?Offeringservicesthataremoreeasilypossible

withsubscriptionsbecausetheydependonthe

OEMowningthetruck.Examplesincludebattery

swapping,energygridservices,andtransportationasaservice.

?ReducingtheTCUfornewdrivetrains(seepanel),perhapsbyexploitingscalingeffectsnotaccessibletotheircustomers,includinglargerfleetsandgrid-relatedserviceslikeuploadingelectricityfromEVbatteries.

Reducingtotalcostofusefornewdrivetrains

PreliminaryresultsfromresearchconductedbyCapgeminiinFrancesuggestthatwithadigitalserviceecosystemforthetruckitis

alreadypossibletobringtheTCUforvehicleswithelectricdrivetrainsdownbelowthe

costofconventionalvehicleswithICE.ThisisachievedbyoffsettingthecostofproducinganEVwiththerevenuesfrom,forexample,energygridservices.ThisiseasiertodowiththesubscriptionmodelbecausetheOEM

canretainownershipofthevehicle.Itmightevenbeachievableifthecustomerownsthevehiclebutthebatteriesarecoveredbya

subscriptionservice.

?Providingsustainabilitybenefitsthathelpcustomersreachtheirtargets,e.g.byensuringthatcircularityprinciplesarefullyexploitedatend-of-lifefora

vehicleorbattery.

OEMsneedtodevelopsubscription-basedsolutionstomeetmarketexpectations

Ourfindingsdemonstratethatthereisamarketfor

rapidvehicleprovisionsolutions.Webelievethat

OEMsshouldalreadybeworkingontheirstrategies

forsatisfyingthismarketthroughsubscriptionmodels.Theymustinnovaterapidlytooffersolutionsthat

aretailoredtosatisfyemergingbusinessneedsandenvironmentalgoals.

Indoingso,theyshouldleveragewhatisknownaboutthemarkettoensurethattheirsolutionsarefitfor

purpose,andspecificallythatthey:

?Simultaneouslysupportbothsubscription-basedusageandelectrificationgoals.

?Addresscustomers’concernssuchascostandrange.

?Satisfyspecificdemandssuchasshortleadtimes(ideallylessthanaweek).

Solutionsmustbuildonresearchtoidentifyneedsandblockers

Companiesshouldmakefulluseofresearchdatato

explorethenuancesofcustomers’needsandblockers(e.g.thedifferencesbetweengroupsintermsof

attitudestoEVpriceversusrange,andthevarying

preferencesregardinghowenergyshouldbechargedfor).Thiswillhelpthemtooptimizetheirproductsandalsoimprovethewaytheyaremarketed.

Ofcourse,customers’preferencesandbeliefsarenotalwayssetinstone.Forexample,inthecaseofrangeanxiety,OEMscanhelptheircustomersunderstandthatwithtoday’srouteplanningtechnology,range

concernscaneasilybeovercome–andofcoursethatthevehiclesofferedwillexploitthistechnology.In

general,OEMsshouldaimtoinformthemarketabouttherealitiesoftoday’sEVs,includingbothadvantagesandchallenges,sincetheindicationsarethatthiswillcreategreateracceptance.

AnotherareawhereOEMsshouldeducatethemarketisincentivesforelectrification.Thisisacomplex

topic,becauseeveryregionandcountryhasitsown

arrangements.Francecurrentlyhastheworld’shighestCO2taxes,butGermanyhasalsointroducedaCO2

chargeinrelationtoautobahns,forinstance.And

theEUoffersa“payloadbonus”whichallowsEVsto

weighmorethanconventionaloneswithoutpenaltytocompensatefortheweightofthebattery(28%ofourrespondentswereunawareofthis).

Sustainabilityshouldbepartofthepackage

Asnoted,ifOEMsretainownershipofassets,itmaybeeasiertocreatecircularity,potentiallyhelpingbothOEMsandtheircustomerstofulfilltheirsustainabilitygoals.

Betterenergyuseisanotheropportunitythatariseswhenmanufacturersretainownershipoftrucksandbatteries.Theyshould,forexample,beabletoexploitfuturebatteries’capacityforbidirectionalcharging.Atruck’sbatterycouldstoreenergyfromsolarpanelsonitsroof.Whenthereisasurplus,consumersina

nearbybuildingcouldbesuppliedwithenergybya

stationarytruck,ortheenergycouldbefedbackintotheelectricitygrid.Inthisway,thevehiclecanactasamobileenergystore.

Manysustainabilitymeasureswillalsohave

commercialbenefits,sincetheyreducewasteandmakebetteruseofresources.

“Subscriptionmodelsoffera

practicalandattractivesolutiontotheprimarybarrierofhigh

upfrontcostsassociatedwithzero-emissionvehicles.By

spreadingoutthecostsand

providingcomprehensiveservices,thesemodelsmakeiteasierfor

truckingcompaniestoadoptgreenertechnologies,therebyacceleratingthetransitiontoamoresustainablefutureinthetransportationindustry.”

RenataObradovic

GroupClientPartnerCapgemini

16TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

HowCapgeminihelp

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論