




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
TheRiseofSubscriptionModels:RevolutionizingTruckOwnership
Exploringthebenefitsandacceptanceofflexiblefleetsolutions
Executivesummary
Arecentsurveyoftruckcustomers
conductedbyCapgeminisupports
majortruckOEMs’existingbeliefs
andexpectationsforsubscription
models,particularlythoserelating
toelectricvehicles.Theresearchalso
addsimportantinsights,forexample
thatmanycustomerswouldprefer
toobtainsubscriptionsdirectlyfrom
manufacturers,andthatsubscriptionscouldhelptoovercometheperceptionthatelectricvehiclesarenotaffordable.Inthisreport,wecommentonthe
resultsandproposeactionsthattruckOEMsshouldbeinitiatingnow,suchascreatingastrategytoaddresskeycustomerconcerns,andinforming
customersbetteronissueslikethe
respectivetotalcostofownership/useforconventionalandelectrictrucks.
2TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
Contents
Introduction5
Researchmethod6
Summaryoffindings7
Findingspart1:marketacceptabilityofthesubscriptionmodel7
Findingspart2:marketreadinessforcommercialelectricvehicles12
Discussionandrecommendations15
HowCapgeminihelpsclients17
implementsubscriptionmodels
Authors19
3
“Inthepassengercarsector,wecan
alreadyobservethatmovingfromICE
vehiclestoEVsisassociatedwithamovefromownershiptousage–implyingthatsubscriptionmodelswillbecomemore
popular.Ournewstudysuggeststhat
thistrendcouldbeevenmoresignificantfortrucks,partlybecauseofaffordabilityissuesbutalsobecauseofuncertainty
aboutEVsandtheirimpactonresidual
values.Thestudyalsopointstothe
potentialofsubscriptionstoaccelerate
uptakeofzero-emissionvehicles.This
findingshouldgeneratefurtherdiscussion
andapossiblerethinkofcurrentapproachestopromotingEVs.”
LaurenceNo?l
HeadofGlobalAutomotiveIndustryCapgemini
4TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
Introduction
Majortruckmanufacturersareactivelyexploringnewownershipmodels,includingsubscriptionmodels.Inthesemodels,customerspayforthe
useoftruckswhilethemanufacturerorotherserviceproviderretainsownershipoftheassets.Therearevariantswherecustomerstake
ownershipofthevehiclesbutobtainbatteriesonasubscriptionbasis.
However,thereisalackofharddataaboutthelevelsofacceptanceforthemodelsamongtruckcustomers,andaboutcustomerexpectationsandpreferences.
Toshedlightonthesequestions,Capgeminirecentlyconductedasurveywhichexploredtheacceptabilitytotruckcustomersofsubscription
services,alongwithrelatedissuessuchaswillingnesstopayapremium,andwhichservicesshouldbeincludedinthesubscriptionmodel.
Wealsoinvestigatedourrespondents’preferencesforelectricvehicles
(EVs)versusinternalcombustionengine(ICE)vehiclesandusedtheresultstohelpusinterpretthefindingsaboutsubscriptions1.Wediscoveredsomeinterestingdifferencesbetweenthepreferencesofthesetwogroupswithrespecttosubscriptions.
Overall,thefindingsconfirmwhatwealreadyknewaboutsubscriptionsforcommercialvehicles,andsomajorOEMswhohavealreadygoneaheadin
thisareacanbeassuredthattheyarebroadlypursuingtherightstrategies.Butwealsomadesomesurprisingandpotentiallyhelpfuldiscoveries,whichwarrantfurtherinvestigation.
Thisreportoutlinesandcommentsonourresults,beforemakingsomerecommendationsforfurtherresearchandactions.
1.Pleasenotethatinthisreportweusetheterm“EVs”tocoverbothbatteryelectric
vehicles(BEVs)andhydrogenfuelcellelectricvehicles(FCEVs),unlessotherwisestated.
5
Researchmethod
NinetyrespondentsfromtruckcustomersinGermany,allofwhomwereascertainedtohaveastrong
engagementinthismarket,tookpartinthisonline
survey(Figure1).WedecidedtoresearchGermany
initiallybecausethismarketisespeciallyreceptiveto
newsalesmodelsandhasastrongimpetustomove
tozeroemissions.InthefuturewearekeentoexpandthisresearchtocoverthewholeofEurope,andperhapsNorthAmericaandChina.
Figure1:Backgroundtothesurvey
Surveyobjective
Theprimaryobjectiveofthesurveywastogatherdataontheacceptanceand
preferredimplementationofthetrucksubscriptionmodelintheGermanmarketanditsreadinesstouseelectricvehicles.
Surveyscope
andrespondents
Respondents’country
Numberofrespondents
90
Useofthefollowing
inrespondents'companies
?Heavyvehicles
?Bigbuses
?Tractors
?Specialvehicles
6TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
7
Summaryof
findings
Findingspart1:marketacceptabilityofthesubscriptionmodel
First,weexploredourrespondents’generalviewsonthesubscriptionmodel,andwhattheythinktheadvantagesanddisadvantagesfortheircompaniesare.
Perceivedadvantagesanddisadvantagesofsubscriptionmodels
Figure2:Reasonsforacceptanceofsubscriptionmodelsfortrucks
20%
Betterabilitytoplanexpensesduetoshortercommitmentperiods
25%
Abilitytotestaparticularvehiclemodel(e.g.anEV)overalongerperiodoftime
42%
Flexibilitytoabsorbshort-termcapacitypeaks
Thebiggestreasonforwantingtoadoptthe
subscriptionmodelistogaintheflexibilitytoabsorb
short-termcapacitypeaks(atechniquecalled“peak
shaving”),mentionedby42%ofrespondents(Figure
2).Thisfindingreflectsthefactthattheirbusinesses
habituallyfacefluctuatingdemand–perhapsmorethanusualgivencurrentlevelsofeconomicuncertaintyanddisruption,particularlytothesupplychain.Peakshavingisalsoanimportanttoolfordealingwithseasonal
demand,forexampleintherun-uptoChristmas.
Otherreasonsforacceptanceincludethedesiretotryoutspecificvehiclemodels,whichprobablyreflects
aninterestinexperimentingwithnewtechnologieswithoutlong-termcommitments.Themodelisalso
seenasusefulforplanningexpenditure,thankstotheshortercommitmentperiodsinvolved.
Whenaskedabouttheirreservationssurrounding
subscriptionmodels,respondentsoftenmentionthe
perceptionthatsubscriptionsareassociatedwith
highcosts–afindingthatreflectsthismarket’spricesensitivity(Figure3).
Tofindoutmore,theresearchinvestigatedhowlargeapremiumcompaniesarepreparedtopayforasubscriptionmodeloveralong-termlease,
Figure3:Objectionstosubscriptionmodelsfortrucks
25%
Complexityinprocessing/
62%
administrationHighcosts
andanalyzedtheresultsaccordingtowhetherthe
respondentisconsideringEVsornot.AsFigure12
shows,amajorityofrespondentsareconsideringEVs,atleasttosomeextent.
Interestingly,potentialEVcustomersarewillingto
paya10-15%premium,whereasthosewhopreferICEvehiclesareonlypreparedtopay5-10%(Figure4).
Figure4:Howmuchpremiumarerespondentswillingtopayforasubscriptionmodel?
15%
RespondentsconsideringEVuse
5%
RespondentsNOTconsideringEVuse
Asanotherpotentialobjectiontosubscriptions,respondentsalsomentioncomplexityof
administration,suggestingthattheydonotyet
associatesubscriptionswiththestraightforward,user-friendlymodelsthattheyprefer.
Preferredapplicationsforthesubscriptionmodel
Wealsotookamoredetailedlookathowrespondentsenvisageusingsubscriptionmodelswithintheir
businesses,withrespecttotheclassofvehicle,range
Around53%ofrespondentsareconsideringintegrating
BatteryElectricVehicles
(BEV)andFuelCellElectric
Vehicles(FCEV)intotheir
fleets.Thisgrowinginterestineco-friendlyoptionsis
accompaniedbyareadinesstoinvestinpremiumservices.ThoseconsideringEVsof
eithertypearewillingto
paya15%premiumfora
subscriptionmodel,whereasotherswillpayjust5%
premium.
overwhichtouseit,andsubscriptionperiod.WeagaincomparedtheresponsesforthoseconsideringEVs
versustherest.
Figure5:Optimalvehicleclassforsubscriptions
RespondentsconsideringEVuse·RespondentsNOTconsideringEVuse
Veryheavytrucks
HeavytrucksMedium-dutytrucks
LighttrucksLightcommercialtrucks
22%13%
19%21%15%
21%
Veryheavytrucks
25%
29%
29%
HeavytrucksMedium-dutytrucks
26%
LighttrucksLightcommercialtrucks
8TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
AsshowninFigure5,respondentsconsideringEVs
optforlighttomedium-dutytrucksbecausethey
haveenoughpositiveexperienceandknowledgeto
integratethosetrucksintotheirdailyschedulesand
routes.ThosepreferringICEvehiclesaremorelikely
inthelong-haulbusiness;thisexplainstheirdifferent
viewsregardingvehicleclassessuitableforsubscriptionmodels.Overall,heavytrucksareslightlylessfavoredcandidatesforsubscriptions,possiblyduetotheir
highercostsorspecificusagepatterns.Thisresponsemightalsobeduetothefactthatplanningtheusageoflong-haultrucksisofteneasierforcompaniesthanplanningmorelocalactivities,andsotheyarenot
lookingforabetterwaytodoit.
Questionedaboutthedistancerangeswherethey
wouldbelikelytoadoptsubscriptionmodels,
respondentsindicatethatthesemodelsareapplicableacrosslocal(upto50km),regional(51-150km),andlong-distance(151km+)ranges,withregionalusagelikelytobehighest(Figure7).Thissuggeststhattheflexibilityofsubscriptionscouldberelevanttoarangeofbusiness
needs,fromlocaldeliveriestolong-haultransportation.
Figure6:Preferreddistancerangesforadoptionofsubscriptionmodels
30%28%
LongdistanceLocalarea
42%
Regionalarea
Takentogether,thisandthepreviousfindingmay
implythatsubscriptiontrucksareseenasmostusefulforthetrafficbetweenregionaldepotsandtheend-
customeror(insomecases)localhubs.Itisgenerally
known–andconfirmedbythird-partyresearch–thattruckcustomersenvisagesimilarapplicationsforEVs,suggestingsynergiesbetweensubscriptionmodelsandelectrictrucks.
Whenitcomestocommitmentperiods,respondentsdemonstrateapreferenceforathree-monthperiod(Figure7).Thisfindingsuggeststhatbusinessesvalueshort-termcommitmentsforbetteradaptabilityandfinancialplanning.
Figure7:Preferredperiodforwhichtocommittoasubscription
15%
12
1%
9
24%
6
32%
3
7%
2
11%
1
Wefindthisresultslightlysurprisingaswewould
expectrespondentstopreferashortercommitmentperiodformaximumflexibility,especiallyinthelightofthedesireforpeakshaving.
Months
ThewillingnessofrespondentsconsideringEVstopaya
significantpremiumfor
subscriptionsindicatesarobustmarketpotentialforthismodel
amongfleetoperatorsprioritizingsustainabilityandinnovation.
9
Preferencesfordeliveryofthesubscriptionmodel
Next,weaskedformoredetailabouthowcompanieswouldliketoobtaintrucksubscriptions–including
whotheywouldliketoprovidethesubscriptions,
whethertheypreferafixedoraflexibleoffer,andtheirexpectationsaboutleadtimes.Wealsodiscussedwhattypeofenginetheywouldbelookingforinavehicle
obtainedbysubscription.
Figure8:Whoshouldofferthesubscriptionmodel?
Newsupplier,e.g.start-up
LeasingcompanywithwhichIdonothaveabusinessrelationshipyet
LeasingcompanywithwhichIalreadyhaveabusinessrelationship
Manufacturer
6%
11%
21%
49%
Interestingly,respondentsshowamarked
preferenceforobtainingsubscriptionsdirectlyfrom
manufacturers,with49%choosingthisoption(Figure8).Leasingcompaniesandnewsuppliersbothranksomewaybehindmanufacturers.
Formanufacturers,thispreferenceisaheartening
finding,andnotjustbecauseitlikelyindicatestrustinOEMs’establishedqualityandservicestandards.Italsoopensuppossibilitiesforfuturerevenuestreams.
Theseideashaveautomotivesustainabilitybenefitsaswellascommercialones,andwe’llreturntothemlater.
Slightlymorethanhalfofrespondentspreferaflexibleofferwithselectablemodulestoafixedone(Figure9).
Figure9:Shouldcustomersbeabletochoosedifferentmoduleswithinthesubscriptionmodel?
54%46%
Fixedo?erwith
prede?nedservicemodels
Flexibleo?erwithfreelyselectablemodules
Thispreferencealignswiththedesireforcustomizable,adaptablesolutions,seeninallsectorsoftoday’s
automotiveindustry.
10TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
11
Figure10:Mostexpectedcomponentsinasubscriptionoffer
Maintenanceand
wearandtear
Insurance
24/7customerservice
Whenrespondentsareaskedwhichspecific
componentscompanieswouldliketoseeincludedin
theoffer,maintenanceandmakinggoodwearandteararethefirstchoice,followedbyinsurance,andthen
24/7customerservice(Figure10).
Whenitcomestoexpectationsabouttheleadtimefordeliveryofavehicleiftheytakeoutasubscription,themajoritypreferaleadtimeoflessthan1week(30%)tolessthan4weeks(24%).Thisindicatestheimportanceofquickserviceandhighvehicleavailabilitywhen
planningasubscription-basedoperation.
Wenowcometotheimportantquestionofwhatformofenginerespondentswouldchooseinrelationto
subscriptions.
Figure11:Preferreddrivetrainsforsubscriptions
28%
Pureelectric
42%
Diesel
9%
21%
Gasoline
Hybriddrive
Dieselaccountsforthehighestshareoftheresponses(42%overall),probablyreflectingitscurrentdominanceandampleinfrastructuresupportratherthanany
entrenchedpreference(Figure11).
Infact,pureelectricandhybridmodelstogetherarechosenbyevenmorerespondents(49%),suggestingconcernaboutenvironmentalconsiderationsand
opennesstonewtechnologies.(And,ifweconsideronlythelargestcompanies’responses,pureelectricemergesasthemostpopularoption.)
Theseresultspaintanencouragingpictureofthe
prospectsforelectrification.Theproportionof
respondentspreferringpureelectric–28%–might
seemlowatfirstsight,butitissignificantlymorethanpureelectric’sshareofthecurrentfleetinGermany.
Pureelectricandhybridmodels
togetherattract49%of
respondents,reflectinggrowingenvironmentalconcernsand
interestinnewtechnologies.Amongthelargestcompanies,pureelectricvehiclesarethemostpopular.
Findingspart2:marketreadinessforcommercialelectricvehicles
Respondents’interestinelectricvehicles
Aswehavejustseen,ourresearchrevealsencouraginglevelsofinterestinelectricorhybridvehiclesinthe
contextofasubscriptionmodel.Thenextsegment
ofourresearchprobesthisinterestfurther,byasking
abouttheextenttowhichorganizationsareconsideringEVsandwhattheyseeasthemainadvantagesand
barriersassociatedwithelectrification.
Figure12:AmajorityofrespondentsarealreadyconsideringtheuseofEVsintheirfleets
22%
40%
Notconsideringatall
Somewhatconsidering
▲
13%
25%
StronglyconsideringNotconsideringmuch
Whenquestionedinthisslightlydifferentway,asmanyas22%ofrespondentssaytheyhavenotconsidered
electrificationatall,while25%haveonlyconsidereditalittle(Figure12).Thisseemsratherdisappointinggiventhemanyreasonstoconsiderit,including
environmentalconcerns,regulatorypressures,andadvancementsinEVtechnology.
Askedabouttheadvantagesofelectrification,manyrespondentsemphasizelocalemission-freeoperationandimprovedimage,highlightingenvironmentalandsocialresponsibilityconsiderations(Figure13).
Figure13:PerceivedadvantagesofusingEVs
Locallyemission-free,especiallyinurbanareas.
Improvedimageduetotheuseofenvironmentallyfriendlycommercialvehicles.
Mediaattentionandadvertisinge?ectivenessasaperceived?rstmover.
11%
8%
25%
12TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
Figure14:PerceiveddisadvantagesofusingEVs
Lowrange
Highacquisitioncosts Longidletimes(chargingtimes)Lowerpayload(duetobatteryweight)Highelectricitycosts
Highmaintenancecosts
33%
28%
18%
4%
37%
37%
Highacquisitioncostsandrangeanxietyremain
significantbarrierstoEVadoption,alongwithconcernsaboutchargingtimesandpayloadcapacity(Figure14).
Drillingdownintothedatauncoverssomeinterestinganglesonthisfinding.Forexample,ifwelookonlyat
respondentswhoareactivelyconsideringEVs,then
highercostsareabiggerconcernthanrange,whereasthosewhoarenotconsideringEVsaremoreconcerned
aboutrangethancost.Thissuggeststhatmore
knowledgeaboutEVs,includingtheiradvantagesandchallenges,leadstogreateracceptance.
Itisalsoworthnotingthatconcernsaboutacquisitioncostscouldbeusedtoargueforthesubscription
model.Indeed,Capgeminiresearchforvarious
commercialvehicleclientssuggeststhat,withbroad
usageofaholisticecosystemofservicesaugmentingtheEVtruck,thetotalcostofuse(TCU)couldbemuchlowerforEVsthanforconventionalICEvehicles.ThisobservationcouldhelpOEMstosellbothEVsand
subscriptionmodels.
13
GainingacceptanceforEVs
Finally,weaskedthoserespondentswhoare
consideringEVsaboutfactorsthatwillsecuretheir
acceptance,andspecificallyabouthowtheyprefertopayforcharging(flatrateversuspaymentperkWh).
Whenchoosingfactorsthatwouldsecuretheir
acceptanceofEVs,respondentstendtoemphasize
rangeandprice,suggestingthatpracticalityandcost-
effectivenessarekeytowideradoption(Figure15).
However,inbothcasesthepicturemayalreadybemorepositivethancompaniesrealize,soaswe’lldiscusslater,OEMsmayneedtoputmoreeffortintoinformingtheircustomers.
Figure15:MostimportantfactorsthatwouldconvincerespondentstouseEVs
Range
Price
PayloadCharginginfrastructure Chargingspeed PerformanceSustainability
TCO/TCU
13%
7%6%
4%
2%2%2%
21%
Chargingforenergy
Overall,numbersaresplitalmostequallybetween
RespondentswhoareinterestedinEVsfavorseparate
wantingtopayforelectricityaspartoftheusagefee
chargingforenergyconsumption,whereasthosewho
orbeingbilledseparatelyforit.Butaninteresting
wanttostaywithconventionalICEvehiclespreferanall-
pictureemergesfromanalyzingtheresultsaccordingtowhethertherespondentsareconsideringEVsorpreferICEvehicles.
inclusivesubscriptionthatincludesenergycosts(Figure16).
ig
Figure16:Shouldchargingbebilledseparatelyorincludedinthesubscriptionfee?
RespondentsconsideringtheuseofEVsRespondentsNOTconsideringtheuseofEVs
All-inclusivechargingcardwhereelectricityisincludedintheusagefee
Chargingcardthatisbilledandpaidforseparately
26%
21%
18%
30%
14TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
15
Discussionand
recommendations
Subscriptionmodelspresentimportant
opportunitiesforcommercialvehicleOEMs
TheseresultstellusthatthemajorityoftransportationcompaniestrustOEMsoverotherstoprovidethem
withasubscriptionmodel.Offeringsubscriptionscanthereforebeanexcellentstrategyformaximizingtrucksales.
Themodelpresentsarangeofadditionalopportunities,forexample:
?Offeringservicesthataremoreeasilypossible
withsubscriptionsbecausetheydependonthe
OEMowningthetruck.Examplesincludebattery
swapping,energygridservices,andtransportationasaservice.
?ReducingtheTCUfornewdrivetrains(seepanel),perhapsbyexploitingscalingeffectsnotaccessibletotheircustomers,includinglargerfleetsandgrid-relatedserviceslikeuploadingelectricityfromEVbatteries.
Reducingtotalcostofusefornewdrivetrains
PreliminaryresultsfromresearchconductedbyCapgeminiinFrancesuggestthatwithadigitalserviceecosystemforthetruckitis
alreadypossibletobringtheTCUforvehicleswithelectricdrivetrainsdownbelowthe
costofconventionalvehicleswithICE.ThisisachievedbyoffsettingthecostofproducinganEVwiththerevenuesfrom,forexample,energygridservices.ThisiseasiertodowiththesubscriptionmodelbecausetheOEM
canretainownershipofthevehicle.Itmightevenbeachievableifthecustomerownsthevehiclebutthebatteriesarecoveredbya
subscriptionservice.
?Providingsustainabilitybenefitsthathelpcustomersreachtheirtargets,e.g.byensuringthatcircularityprinciplesarefullyexploitedatend-of-lifefora
vehicleorbattery.
OEMsneedtodevelopsubscription-basedsolutionstomeetmarketexpectations
Ourfindingsdemonstratethatthereisamarketfor
rapidvehicleprovisionsolutions.Webelievethat
OEMsshouldalreadybeworkingontheirstrategies
forsatisfyingthismarketthroughsubscriptionmodels.Theymustinnovaterapidlytooffersolutionsthat
aretailoredtosatisfyemergingbusinessneedsandenvironmentalgoals.
Indoingso,theyshouldleveragewhatisknownaboutthemarkettoensurethattheirsolutionsarefitfor
purpose,andspecificallythatthey:
?Simultaneouslysupportbothsubscription-basedusageandelectrificationgoals.
?Addresscustomers’concernssuchascostandrange.
?Satisfyspecificdemandssuchasshortleadtimes(ideallylessthanaweek).
Solutionsmustbuildonresearchtoidentifyneedsandblockers
Companiesshouldmakefulluseofresearchdatato
explorethenuancesofcustomers’needsandblockers(e.g.thedifferencesbetweengroupsintermsof
attitudestoEVpriceversusrange,andthevarying
preferencesregardinghowenergyshouldbechargedfor).Thiswillhelpthemtooptimizetheirproductsandalsoimprovethewaytheyaremarketed.
Ofcourse,customers’preferencesandbeliefsarenotalwayssetinstone.Forexample,inthecaseofrangeanxiety,OEMscanhelptheircustomersunderstandthatwithtoday’srouteplanningtechnology,range
concernscaneasilybeovercome–andofcoursethatthevehiclesofferedwillexploitthistechnology.In
general,OEMsshouldaimtoinformthemarketabouttherealitiesoftoday’sEVs,includingbothadvantagesandchallenges,sincetheindicationsarethatthiswillcreategreateracceptance.
AnotherareawhereOEMsshouldeducatethemarketisincentivesforelectrification.Thisisacomplex
topic,becauseeveryregionandcountryhasitsown
arrangements.Francecurrentlyhastheworld’shighestCO2taxes,butGermanyhasalsointroducedaCO2
chargeinrelationtoautobahns,forinstance.And
theEUoffersa“payloadbonus”whichallowsEVsto
weighmorethanconventionaloneswithoutpenaltytocompensatefortheweightofthebattery(28%ofourrespondentswereunawareofthis).
Sustainabilityshouldbepartofthepackage
Asnoted,ifOEMsretainownershipofassets,itmaybeeasiertocreatecircularity,potentiallyhelpingbothOEMsandtheircustomerstofulfilltheirsustainabilitygoals.
Betterenergyuseisanotheropportunitythatariseswhenmanufacturersretainownershipoftrucksandbatteries.Theyshould,forexample,beabletoexploitfuturebatteries’capacityforbidirectionalcharging.Atruck’sbatterycouldstoreenergyfromsolarpanelsonitsroof.Whenthereisasurplus,consumersina
nearbybuildingcouldbesuppliedwithenergybya
stationarytruck,ortheenergycouldbefedbackintotheelectricitygrid.Inthisway,thevehiclecanactasamobileenergystore.
Manysustainabilitymeasureswillalsohave
commercialbenefits,sincetheyreducewasteandmakebetteruseofresources.
“Subscriptionmodelsoffera
practicalandattractivesolutiontotheprimarybarrierofhigh
upfrontcostsassociatedwithzero-emissionvehicles.By
spreadingoutthecostsand
providingcomprehensiveservices,thesemodelsmakeiteasierfor
truckingcompaniestoadoptgreenertechnologies,therebyacceleratingthetransitiontoamoresustainablefutureinthetransportationindustry.”
RenataObradovic
GroupClientPartnerCapgemini
16TheRiseofSubscriptionModels
HowCapgeminihelp
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- T/CCMA 0107-2020移動式升降工作平臺排氣煙度臂架式升降工作平臺測量方法
- T/CBMMAS 007-2022 T/BFTA 02-2022適老家具通用技術要求
- T/CBMCA 020-2021地鋪石瓷磚
- T/CAQI 243-2021建筑智慧照明系統技術要求
- T/CAQI 201-2021小型新風系統用風量分配器
- T/CAQI 127-2020空氣凈化器家居環境下甲醛凈化性能評價規范
- ccat考試題及答案
- 共性判斷考試題及答案
- 單招三類考試題及答案
- 道德標準面試題及答案
- 初三中考宣誓誓詞82060
- 觸電事故桌面推演方案
- 護理風險評估及填寫要求
- 《中興通訊績效管理制度》-人事制度表格【管理資料】
- 微邦生物技術生活污水處理中的應用
- 鐵路工務技術手冊
- (完整版)硬件測試規范
- 2006年工資標準及套改對應表
- DBJ∕T 13-183-2014 基樁豎向承載力自平衡法靜載試驗技術規程
- 張雙樓煤礦安全評價報告(出版稿10.14)
- [模板]健康教育處方
評論
0/150
提交評論