江蘇省知識產權十大典型案件2022年江蘇省知識產權十大典型案件序言2022年，黨的二十大勝利召開，擘畫大部署。在江蘇省委、省政府的正確領導件3258件，罰沒款6978.16萬元；省版權和行動，查辦侵權盜版案件584起，涉案2億林草種苗案件41件，罰沒款78.31萬元；南貨物數量62.12萬件。在司法保護方面，全全省檢察機關共辦理各類知識產權案件778件；公安部門組織“昆侖2022”等行動，在第23個世界知識產權日來臨之際，現將2022年江蘇省知識產權十大典型2023年4月PAGE04PAGE04 administrativelawenforc“BlueWeb”and“CleanWeb”inbatchesofinfring“Kunlun2022”launchedbythepublicwereinvestigatedthroughoutthcomplexcasedetails,d NanjingHencerPhOficeandBayerIntellDecisiononPatentTechnologyCo.,Ltd.,LuX CaseofCopyrightInfringement CaseofCopyrightInfringement有限公司、德祿家具(南通)有限公司等侵害商標權及RaumplusBesitz-undEntw(Taicang)FumitureTechnologyCo.,Ltd.v.DeluFumiture(Shanghai)Co.,LFumiure(Nantong)Co.,Ltd.WinnerMedicalCo,Ltd.v.SuzhouWinnerMedicalCo,XangWeienv.LiXXgangandCusuDstidTanhDisputeoverCopyrightJengsuChangfengMedcalhndistyCo,tde tions"WinterGames(ParalympicWinterGames)inCrosPAGE08PAGEPAGE08/II案情介紹II拜耳知識產權有限責任公司(以下簡稱拜耳公司)系“取代的噁唑烷酮和其在血液凝固領域中的應用”的發明專利權利人。被訴侵權的南京恒生制藥有限公司(以下簡稱恒生公司)在其官/I處理結果也沒有事實表明其僅向準備申請注冊利伐沙班產品的特定企業進行了宣傳，不符合藥品和醫療實施不屬于藥品和醫療器械行政審批例外情形的許諾銷售行為，可能導致不特定對象推遲向專本案是涉及專利法Bolar例外條款適用的典型案例，對Bolar例外條款作了細化解釋，明確了適用條件以及許諾銷售行為不屬于專利法關于藥品和醫療器械行政審批的侵權免責情形 衡專利權人和仿制藥企之間的利益，既要保障社會公眾在專利權屆滿后及時獲得價格低廉的藥NanjingHencerPharmaceuticalCo.,Ltd.v.NanjingCaseofPropertyOfficeandBayerIntellectualCaseofDisputeoverAdministrativeDecisionondisplayed“RivaroxabanTablets”and“RivaroxabanTabletAPls”onitsotrademarkofHencer.BelievingthattheaforeOficerenderedanadministrativedecisdecision,asitbelievedthatitsdisplayoftheproduTherefore,HencerfiledanadministrativeactionwithtPAGE10PAGE10unspecificobjects,andcanbeeitherthroughitswebsiteandexhibitions,constitutinganofferforsale.Ajudgemewhetherexemptionsfromadministraforexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevicesareimport”fortheapplicationforadministrativeexamtowhichexemptionsfromadminisclaimsofHencer.Later,Hencerfiledanappealagainstthefirst-instSupremeCourtmadeasecondinstancejudgment,rulingthattheoriginaljudgmentshallconditionsoftheBolarexceptionandthefactthatexedonotapplytoanofferfothepatentlawonexemptPAGE12PAGEPAGE12/II…·案情介紹…IIIIII…處理結果…CaseofInfringementonTr XX XXaccordingtowhichioftheproduction,receipt,distribution,use,reproduction,extraction,pressecretsstored,processedandtransmittedbythecomputertechnology,andtakPAGE14PAGEPAGE142011,SiXXlujoinedHuikeasnon-disclosureandnon-competeagreemZhonggongconstantlyrecrudesigndrawingsofatmospheconfidentialitymeasuresinthethemobileharddiskcontainingtcontinuouslyprovidedLuXXchangoByusingtheaforesaidsecret/IOutcomeThecourtheldthatZhonggongobinseriousviolationofconfidentialityobligations,whichconstituofthedefendantentity'sanThiscaseisatypicaltradesecrets,andmodified“bringingsijudicialinterpretationonhowtodetermine“seriousviolation”andviolation".Thejudgmentheldthatsignificantlossescausedtovictim(s)importantfactortomeasurethe“sercommittedacrimeofinfringeaflagrantviolation.Thecourt'sdecisionreflectsentitybecameademonstPAGE16PAGE15PAGE16 呂某龍等侵犯冬奧會吉祥物“冰墩墩”著作權案/I/處理結果IIII分析點評…IIIIInFebruary,2022,thepublicsecurityofficersofYangzhouandotherplacesthgenuineproductsonthXXinWuxiandsoldthemonlinJiangsusimultaneously,inanefforttocrackdownonthewholeillegalindustrialc “producing-wholesaling-selling”counterfeit“BingDwenDwen”sandpackagingmaterials.ItwasfoundthatZhaoXX,LPAGE18PAGEPAGE18ofthepatentowner,avoidedadvers //I案情介紹PAGE20PAGEPAGE20/I分析點評…IINetEase(Hangzhou)NetworkCo.,Ltd.(hereiendof2018,thedefendantsDuanXXming,WangXXbin,WuXXlaiconspiredtojointlydevelopa“privateserver”ofthe“JourneDuanXXming,WangXXbin,HuangJia,HaoXX,HuangYiandWuXXlaijointlypurchasedthecharacters,maps,petsandothermonlineandsentthemtothedefendantChenXXthedevelopment,maintenanceandupgradeofthe“privateserver”gaillegalprofits,knowinggeneralagentofthegamewhoInordertomakeillegalprofits,thedefendanLiXXxuan,ZhangXX,QinXX,LiuXXxianandLuXXboservthedefendantLiuXXjietopromotethothers'workswithoutthepermissionofthecopyrightowner,operatedthe“privateserver”gametothepubsentencedtoafixed-termimprisonmentdefendantswithminorviolationweregrantedareprieve.AfterthefirstinstancPAGE22PAGEPAGE22gamecodes,buttheyuspatentedgame,withsubstantiallyidenticaldynseriousviolation.Theprincipalcriminalwassentencedtoafofmorethanfouryears,andotherdefendantswererespectivelygivpunishments,reflectingpropertycrimesthro德祿家具(南通)有限公司(以下簡稱德祿南通公司),約定合資企業在PAGE24PAGEPAGE24/I分析點評…IIFurniture(Shanghai)Co.,Ltd.,DeluFurniture(Nantong)Co.,Ltd. Competitionontheirfurnitureproducts,shippingordestorefrontsignboards,exhibitionhallsandbiddingdocumentbrandsashigh-endcustom-madefurnitherelatedwordssuchas“德祿(Delu)”Thetrademarks“德祿(Delu)”and“raumplus”wereregisteredwitandDelu(Taicang)Furnitu(hereinafterreferredtoas“DeluNantong”)basedontheagretheterminationofjointventurerelationsjointventures.However,DeluShanghaiIIOutcomedefendantentitiescontiprojectsbyusingthetrademarksandtradenamesof“德祿(Deunfaircompetition.InPAGE26PAGEPAGE26the"obstructionofevidence"rule.InviewofthefactthatcompensationandtheconditionsandconsiderationsforapplicaandsupportedtheclaimfpropertyrightsofChineseandabroad,effectivelypromotedtheconstructioandmarket-orientedbusinessenvironment,a穩健醫療用品股份有限公司與蘇州穩健醫療用品有限公司、蘇PAGE28PAGEPAGE28公司損失及維權合理費用人民幣1021655元。情聯防聯控機制醫療物資保障組、團中央青年志愿者行動指導中心、湖北省疫情防控指揮部等展的典型案例。WinnerMedicalCo.,Ltd.v.SuzhouWinnerMedicalCo.,Ltd.,Foundedin2000,WinnerMediCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoas“SuzhouWinner”,fouCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoas“HWinnerbelievedthattheafobusinessactivitiesasWinner,whichreflecteresultedinconfusionandmisundersandunfaircompetition.SuzhouWinnerandHangweiweretheabsolutecontrollingshareholdcompaniesworkedtogethertocommitajointinfringement.Hence,HuaXXandname,andcommittedtrademarkinfrinstatementstothemarketsupervisionauthority,whichseriPAGE30PAGEPAGE30greatlydamagedthegoolongtimespan,andrefusedtosubmitevidencesuchasfinancialbooksasrHangweiandHuaXX,thecourtappliinfringementthatcanbeascertained,andappliedstathatcannotbeascertained.Winnerisawell-knownmanufacturertrademarkandtradenamearewoftheStateCouncil'sdamagesoffourtimes,increasedtheamountofcompensation,determinedpmaterialsmarket,andrealizedtheintPAGE32PAGEPAGE32UStudio:CaseofDisputeoverCopyrighCartoonSocietyandanationalfirst-classartisinthenameof“Weithe14thShengongAwardfoundthatthejadecarvingworkhassimilaroverallstructurewiXiangWeirenclaimedthatthechCity,JiangsuProvince,requestingThefirst-instancejudgmentrenderedbytreproductionofXiangWeiren'spainting,butanoftheoriginalpainting,theoriginalicarvingworkbasedonotherPAGE34PAGEPAGE34copyrightownerandthepaymentofcompensationmayconstituteaninfringementofthecopyrightofthepainting.However,itisofgreareproductionortherightofadaptionisinfringedincludesvariouscomplicatedprocessescarving,finecarvingadaption.Thejudgmentofthiscaseupholdsthephconstitutesinnovativeexplitigationdisputesinthidevelopmentoftrad 技術有限公司等3家江蘇企業在內6家中國企業被列名被告。之后于2021年12月6日將中國PAGE36PAGEPAGE36根據美國《1930年關稅法》(TariffAfocusofdisputeinthiscaseafterexpertdiscussion:theformulatedthe“three-step”responsestrategy,namely,patinvolvedtoseekcountermeasuresandfilerJiangsuChangfengMedicalIndustry“Section337Investigations”OnJuly9,2021,Copanltalia(ITC)for“Section337Investigations”on“CertainOnOctober28,2022,ITCmadeafinaldet/AnalysisandCoPAGE38PAGEPAGE38missedtheopportunityduetoabsence,andseveraldinthiscase.Themainworkincludes:1.Communicatothelawsuit;2.Holding“experiencesharing”meetings,organizingpubontheenterprises,settinguparesponse南通海關查獲跨境電商侵犯2022北京冬奧會(冬殘奧會)特·案情介紹I了海關總署公告2021年第62號備案保護的2022北京冬奧會PAGE40PAGEPAGE40 /ICaseBriefImanuallyinspectedthegoods.Afterunpackingandinspection,253keychainsbearingtheAfterverification,theParalympicWinterGames(hereinafterrepermission.Upontherequestofthecopyrightowner,N14oftheRegulationsonthforfeited253keychainsand612keyringsinfrGames,arethespiritualwealthoftheOlympPAGE42PAGEPAGE42Symbolsandraisingthepubliexclusiverights