專業英語四級寫作分類模擬368WRITINGReadcarefullythefollowingexcerptonreal-namepackagedeliveryinChina,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLESSTHAN200words,inwhichyoushould:?summarizethemainmessageoftheexcerpt,andthen?commentonwhethersendingpackageshouldrequirereal-nameregistration.Youshouldsupportyourselfwithinformationfromtheexcerpt.Markswillbeawardedforcontentrelevance,contentsufficiency,organizationandlanguagequality.Failuretofollowtheaboveinstructionsmayresultinalossofmarks.UnderNewCrackdown,SendingPackagesNowRequiresanIDCardChina'sStatePostBureauannouncedonMondaythatitwillstartanationwidecampaigntocrackdownonillegalactivitiesbyenforcingreal-nameregistrationforsenders.Thenation'snewrulesrequiresenderstopresentofficialID,especiallywhensendingfromapublicplace,suchashotelsortrainstations.TherulesalsostipulatethatpackagesshouldgothroughanX-raymachineforasecuritycheck.Chinabegantomullareal-nameregistrationpolicyintheindustryafterparcelstaintedwithtoxicchemicalskilledamaninEastChina'sShandongProvinceandpoisonedsevenothersinDecember2013.AstaffmembersurnamedChenworkinginapostofficeinHohhotsaidthatsendersmusttaketheiroriginalIDcardstothepostoffice."ThecourierswillscanandrecordyourIDinformation.Sendersdon'tneedtoworryaboutpersonalinformationbeinginsecure.Forinstance,therewillbespecially-assignedpersonneltokeepandmanageallthisinformation,"Chenadded.However,manyNetusersstillexpressedconcernovertheleakofpersonalinformationinreal-nameregistration.ZhuHong,anassociateprofessortoldthemassmediathatwhetherthereal-nameregistrationsystemwouldholdbackpackagescontainingillegalorhazardousgoodsisnotclear."Wecantracethesendersnowwithphonenumbers.RegisteringIDcardsmightonlyspeeduptheprocessabit".答案：［范文］Real-NameParcelDelivery,SecurityGuaranteeorPrivacyThreat?Asevereincidentthatparcelstaintedwithtoxicchemicalshadkilledamanin2013causedChina'sStatePostBureautoenforcereal-nameregistrationforsendersusingthenationalcourierservice.Thatistosay,thesendersarerequiredtopresenttheirofficialIDwhentheydelivergoods.However,inspiteofthenewrules,thereisstillaconcernovertheleakofpersonalinformationinreal-nameregistrationandthenewsystemisnotassuredtoholdbackthedangercausedbyillegalorhazardousgoods.Therefore,asfarasIamconcerned,real-nameparceldeliveryisnecessarybutmuchmorenewregulationsshouldbeputforwardtodealwiththenewprivacythreatitbringsabout.Therearemanyseriousthreatsevenafterthestate'spolicyiscarriedout.Firstly,insomeprovincestheparcelswithfakesendernamesarestillacceptedandmostcouriersfailtocheckwhatisinsidethepackages.Secondly,manyofthesendersrefusetoworkwiththecouriers,becausetheythinkitisunsafetounveiltheirinformation,andthereforethecourierscanhardlyverifytheirrealinformation.Thirdly,theworstproblemisprobablytheleakofthepersonalinformation.Ifyourphonenumberisleakedtorealestateagents,youwillhavetoreceivelotsofharassingphonecalls,someofwhichmayevenindicateyourname,youraddress,yourworkplace,andevenyourpersonalaccount.AsChinamovesintotheeraofE-commerce,courierservicesaregraduallyturningintoaninseparablepartofourlife.Atthesametime,becauseofthelurkingperilsmentionedabove,morestrategiesshouldbedesignedtohelpthesendersandthedeliveryservicesbetterco-operatewitheachotherinordertomoveinamuchsmootherway.［解答］考生在下筆之前應先審題，明確寫作要求：針對“寄送包裹是否應該實名制”這一熱議話題，首先總結材料中的主要觀點，然后提出個人看法。文章結構可安排如下：第一段：簡要概括材料中所指明的現象。因為快遞運輸過中出現的事故，我國近來出臺以下政策，要求寄送包裹的人在寄送時要使用身份證進行實名登記。然而該政策并沒有完全消除所有的危險，依然有不安和信息不安全的現象存在。我個人的看法是，寄送包裹應該實名制，但應該加強法規，以減少隱患。第二段：國家的政策實行之后仍然有很多問題。第一，在某些省份依然有人使用假名；第二，很多寄件人不配合政策，不愿意提供實名；第三，最嚴重的問題就是實名制后出現大量個人隱私被盜用的問題。第三段：重申觀點——使用快遞不可避免，實名制也是必須，怎么保護好自己的個人信息，讓寄件者和快遞公司更好地合作是我們要考慮的問題。Readcarefullythefollowingexcerpton2.5-dayweekendinChina,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLESSTHAN200words,inwhichyoushould:?summarizethemainmessageoftheexcerpt,andthen?commentonwhether2.5-dayweekendpolicyshouldbeadoptedinChina.Youshouldsupportyourselfwithinformationfromtheexcerpt.Markswillbeawardedforcontentrelevance,contentsufficiency,organizationandlanguagequality.Failuretofollowtheaboveinstructionsmayresultinalossofmarks.ChinatoImplement2.5-DayWeekendsThisSummerTheStateAdministrationofTourismismullingoveranewplantocreatetwo-and-a-halfdayweekendsacrossthecountrysometimebythesummer.Theideaistogiveemployeesmorefamilytimeandalsostimulatetourism.AnumberofprovincesandmunicipalitiesacrossChina,includingHebei,JiangxiandChongqing,haveissuednewpolicies,callingoncompaniestocreate2.5-dayweekends.SincebeingannouncedinNovember,theideahasbegungainingtraction."It'sagoodthingforus,becausewecanobviouslytakemoretimetorelax.""Ithinkit'sagoodidea.TherearesomanypeoplecommutingonFridays.Thetrafficisusuallyverycrowded."LiuSimin,DeputySecretaryGeneraloftheBeijingTourismSociety,sayshaving2.5-dayweekendscanhelpsatisfypeople'sdesireformoreshorttrips.However,henotesthenewpolicyislimitedinscope."Threekeypointscontainedinthisplansuggestit'sonlyabenefitforacertaingroupofpeople.Firstly,it'snotarule,butratherasuggestion.Secondly,theplanisconditional.Lastly,it'sonlyappliedtothesummermonths,ratherthantoallyear.Becauseofthesestipulations,thecoverageofthe2.5-dayweekendsisgoingtobeverylimited."Undertheprovisions,a40-hourworkingweekisstillrequired,meaningemployeeswhoget2.5-dayweekendsaregoingtohavetomakeupthehourssomewhereelseduringtheirweek.答案：［范文］NoNeedtoImplement2.5-DayWeekends2.5-dayweekendsinsummerhasarousedadebateamongthepublicasitconcernspeople'sfamilytimeandvacationplans.Manypeoplebelievethatlongerweekendwillbringusmoretimetorelaxandboosttourismindustry.However,thisplanisonlyappliedinsummerandisnotcompulsoryforallcompanies,soithaslimitedstimulationfortourism.Frommyperspective,2.5-dayweekendsshouldnotbeadoptedinChina.Firstly,eventhoughtheplanispartiallydesignedtoencourage"leisuretime,"peoplearenotnecessarilygivenmoretimetospendwiththeirfamilies,becausetheyneedtomakeupthehourssomewhereelseduringtheirweek.Sotheplandoesnotmakeanysenseifworkersneedtowakeupearlierandstayuplateduringtheotherfourdays.Secondly,itisnotworthwhilewastingahalfdayonFriday.IfemployeesareallowedtotakeoffatnoononFriday,itmeansmostworkerswillbeinastateofweekendinthemorningonFriday,whichmaycauselowefficiencyinwork.Meanwhile,companieswilllosehalf-dayproductivitywhichisagreatlossforsmallandmediumenterprises.Sowecanpredictthatmostprivateenterpriseswillnotimplementthisnon-compulsorypolicy.Allinall,2.5-dayweekendsareneithernecessarynorviableinChina.Soourweekendshouldbetwodaysagainthissummer,sameastheywereever.［解答］本題給出的材料是針對是否應當推行兩天半周末進行討論，呈現了兩種不同的觀點。根據題目要求，先總結雙方的觀點，再給出自己的看法。文章可按下列結構來安排：第一段：先整合概括正反雙方的觀點，然后表明自己的論點——在中國，不應采取兩天半周末。第二段：陳述自己的理由。首先，兩天半周末并不能真正帶來更多休息時間；第二，兩天半周末實際上會造成半天工作時間的浪費。第三段：總結全文——在中國，兩天半周末不可行。ReadcarefullythefollowingexcerptonclosingpublictoiletsinUK,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLESSTHAN200words,inwhichyoushould:?summarizethemainmessageoftheexcerpt,andthen?commentonwhetherpublictoiletsshouldbeclosedinUK.Youshouldsupportyourselfwithinformationfromtheexcerpt.Markswillbeawardedforcontentrelevance,contentsufficiency,organizationandlanguagequality.Failuretofollowtheaboveinstructionsmayresultinalossofmarks.PublicToilets"WipedOut"inPartsofUKSomeUKHighStreetsandpublicspacesnolongerhaveanycouncil-runpublictoilets,theBBChaslearned.Atleast1,782facilitieshaveclosedacrosstheUKinthelastdecade,FreedomofInformationrequestsfound.TheLocalGovernmentAssociationsaidcouncilsweretryingtokeeptoiletsopenbutfacedsqueezedbudgets.PublictoiletshaveexistedonUKHighStreetsformorethan150years,butthereisnolegalrequirementforlocalauthoritiestoprovidetoilets,meaningtheyareoftencloseddownifcouncilsfeeltheycannotaffordtheupkeep.RaymondMartin,oftheBritishToiletAssociation,saidprovidingtoiletswasabouthealth,wellbeing,equalityandsocialinclusion."It'salsoaboutpublicdecencyandpublicdignity—wedon'twantpeoplebeingforcedtourinateinthestreets,"hesaid.JoanDeansaidherhusbandBrian,whohasParkinson'sdisease,waslefthumiliatedwhenhewethimselfafterfailingtofindatoiletonatriptoLevenshulme,inManchester,where18toiletshavebeenclosedinthelast10years.ALocalGovernmentAssociationspokesmansaidcouncilsweredoingeverythingtheycouldtokeeppublictoiletsopen,includingrunningcommunitytoiletschemestoenablepubs,restaurantsandshopstomaketheirtoiletsavailabletothepublic.Cutsmeantcouncilshadlesstospendoncommunityservicesandthenextfewyearswouldcontinuetobeachallenge,hesaid.答案：［范文］ChangesforPublicToiletsAtightbudgethasforcedcouncilstoclosethenon-profitservicestheyprovideincludingpublictoilets.However,officialsintheBritishToiletAssociationarguedthatpeople'slifeandwell,beingorsomaybewellaffectedwithoutpublictoilets.Inmyopinion,ratherthanclosingthepublictoilets,councilsshouldworkouttheproblemwithothersolutions.Firstly,councilscanco-operatewiththelocaltownsorNGOsorcharitiestotransferresponsibilitiesforrunningthetoiletstothem.Thiscansaveagreatmanypublicinconveniencefromclosureandeasetheburdenoftoiletcostsoncouncils.Bysharingtheburdenoftoiletswithotherorganizations,ahugesumcanbesparedandputtomoreconstructiveuses.Next,tohelpreducefuturerunningcosts,councilsmaymakeimprovementstofacilities,includingenergyandwatersavingmeasures.Inaddition,chargesshouldbeintroducedandthepublicshouldpreparetopayforusingpublictoiletstoensurethattheyremainopen.Theincomefromthosetoiletswillbekepttopayforrunningcosts.Tostunup,publictoiletshavegreatimportance,whetherinregardtopeople'swell-being,socialinclusionandharmony.Therefore,moremeasuresshouldbetakentomaintainthepublictoiletsandotherfacilities.［解答］材料中介紹了英國政府關閉公共衛生間以及各方人士對其看法。根據題目要求，先簡單總結材料中的觀點，在針對是否關閉公共衛生間這一問題給出個人觀點。文章結構可安排如下：第一段：整合概括材料中的觀點，然后表達自己的觀點——不應關閉公共衛生間，應該采取其它辦法來解決這一問題。第二段：列出自己的觀點。第一，可以和其它機構組織合作，減輕市政府的壓力；第二，修繕衛生間，減少維護成本；第三，對使用者收費。第三段：總結全文——公共衛生間對公眾非常重要，要采取措施來維護公共衛生間Readcarefullythefollowingexcerptonthetrendofyoungsterslivingwithparents,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLESSTHAN200words,inwhichyoushould:?summarizethemainmessageoftheexcerpt,andthen?commentonwhetheradultsshouldlivewiththeirparents.Youshouldsupportyourselfwithinformationfromtheexcerpt.Markswillbeawardedforcontentrelevance,contentsufficiency,organizationandlanguagequality.Failuretofollowtheaboveinstructionsmayresultinalossofmarks.AMillionMoreYoungsterstoLiveWithParentsAmillionmoreyoungpeoplearelikelytofindthemselveslivingwiththeirparentsoverthenextdecade,accordingtoaninsurancecompany.Themainreasonistheaffordabilityofhousing,thecompanysaid.Thestudyforecaststhat3.8millionpeopleagedbetween21and34willbelivingathomeby2025,athirdmorethanatthemoment.Thenumberofhouseholdscontainingtwoormorefamiliesisalsoexpectedtorise,from1.5millionto2.2million.CharlotteNisbetandherboyfriendJayArkell—bothaged24—wereforcedtomovebackinwithhisparentsineastLondon,astheycouldnotaffordtorentbythemselves."Itwouldbenicetohaveourownspace,andnottoworryabouttreadingonhisparents'toes,"shetoldtheBBC.Shecannotforeseebeingabletogetaplaceoftheirowninthenearfuture."I'mpessimistic.Onourcurrentsalaries,noway.Ifwedid,wewouldn'tbeabletoeatoutorgoonholiday."Butnoteveryoneisgloomyabouttheprospectofsharingtheirlivingspacewithothercouples."Theadvantagesincludehavingotherpeoplearoundforcompany,cheaperlivingcosts,andmorepeopletosharethechores,"thecompanysaid,"Multigenerationallivingisoftenseenasanecessityratherthanachoice,particularlywhenadultsareforcedtomovebackinwithfamilytohelpsaveforlong-termgoalslikebuyingtheirownhouse."答案：［范文］BetterNottoLivewithParentsThereisatrendthatmoreandmoreyoungadultsareforcedtomovebackhomeandlivewiththeirparentsbecauseofthehighcostofrentingorhousingprice.Somepeopleconsideritascompanyforparents.Frommyperspective,adultchildrenshouldnotlivewiththeirparents.Firstly,peopleofdifferentageshavedifferentlifestyles.Usually,parentslikequietandregularlifewhereasyoung-stetspreferexcitingandnoisyenjoyment.Iftheylivetogether,chancesarethatparentsfeelthattheyarealwaysdisturbedandthechildrenmayfeelthattheyareoftenconstrained.Secondly,peopleofdifferentgenerationsarelikelytohavedifferentviewsonissuesrangingfromminorhouseholdaffairstointernationalbusiness.Therefore,familylifemaybeunpleasantforbothparentsandchildren.Thirdly,situationswillworseniftheadultchildrengetmarried.Afterall,notmanyyoungpeoplewanttolivewiththeirin-laws.Oncechildrensetupanewfamily,theywanttobreakfreefromtheirparentsandanyinterferencefromthemmayleadtoconflicts.Allinall,wemaydrawtheconclusionthatiftheparentsandtheiradultchildrenliveapart,boththeoldandtheyoungcanenjoycompleteindependenceandfreedomandlivealifetheylike.Toavoidlivingtogether,thechildrencouldrentanapartmentwithotherpeerstosharethecostsoracceptfinancialsupportfromtheparents.［解答］本題的主旨是討論成年子女是否應和父母同住。材料中提出了兩種觀點，首先應總結兩方觀點，再提出個人的觀點，可支持也可反對和父母同住。文章結構可如下文安排：第一段：簡要概括雙方觀點，并表明自己的觀點——最好不要和父母同住。第二段：分三點論證。首先，父母和子女有不同的生活方式；第二，兩代人觀點不同，會引發矛盾：第三，如果結婚，可能矛盾增多。第三段：總結全文，重申觀點——成年子女最好不要和父母同住。Readcarefullythefollowingexcerptonthetrendofpeoplehavingamid-careerbreak,andthenwriteyourresponseinNOLESSTHAN200words,inwhichyoushould:?summarizethemainmessageoftheexcerpt,andthen?giveyourcommentonmid-careerbreak.Youshouldsupportyourselfwithinformationfromtheexcerpt.Markswillbeawardedforcontentrelevance,contentsufficiency,organizationandlanguagequality.Failuretofollowtheaboveinstructionsmayresultinalossofmarks.TheSurprisingBenefitsofaMid-CareerBreakOnceconsideredcareersuicide,sabbaticalsarenownotonlyaccepted—butencouraged—bysomeemployers.Here'showtotakeoneandstillgetahead.WhenWinstonChentoldhisfriendsthathehadquithisjobaschieftechnologyofficeratasoftwarecompanytomovetoasmallislandinArcticNorwaywithhisfamilyforayear,fewpeoplecalledhimcrazy.Instead,mostpeoplesimplyreplied:"IwishIhadthegutstodothat."Atfirst,hesaidhewasconcernedthattimeawayfromtheindustrymighthurthiscareer."That'sthemainreasonthatkeepspeoplefromdoingthis,andIwasnodifferent,"hesaidinanemail."Butyouhavetocreatetheurgencyforlivingthelifeyouwant."Whilemanypeopledreamoftakingtimeoffmid-career,fewactuallydoit.Butthenumberofpeopletakinglengthysabbaticalslaterinlifeisincreasing,accordingtoexperts.That'sinpartduetocompaniesbecomingmoreopentotheideaandthehigherrateatwhichpeoplearechangingjobs.Anddepend