1、SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板修改稿回答審稿人的意見（最重要的部分） List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled “ Paper Title” （ID: 文章稿號 ）. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our pa

2、per, as w ell as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully a nd have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red i n the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as f

3、lowing:Responds to the reviewer s comments: Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment:（,簡要列出意見 ，,）Response: x x x x x x2. Response to comment:（,簡要列出意見 ，,）Response: xxxxxx 。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏針對不同的問題有下列幾個禮貌術語可適當用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of Weare very sorry for our incorrect writingIt is really t

4、rue as Reviewer suggested thatWe have made correction according to the Reviewer s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer s suggestion As Reviewer suggested thatConsidering the Reviewer' s suggestion, we have 最后特意感謝下這個審稿人的意見：Special thanks to you for your good comments.

5、Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: xxx xxx Other changes:1. Line 60-61, the statements of "" were corrected as ""2. Line 107,""was added 3. Line 129, ""was deleted xxxxxxWe tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. Thes e cha

6、nges will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will m eet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and

7、 suggestions以下是審稿人意見和本人的回復。與大家分享。從中可以看出，這位審稿人認真讀了文章，提出很多寶貴的意見。這些意見分布在文章的各個地方。我很詫異有人真正讀了我的文章。看到這些意見，我覺得很感激，不是因為接收文章的原因，而是這些意見能真正有助于提高文章的質量。從中還看出，回答審稿人問題的“技巧”。對于回答問題，有的人就是一味反駁，卻不加改進。記得ACS Style Guide里面說，當審稿人問到問題的，哪怕是他理解錯誤，這也說明作者這么寫，其他讀者也會理解錯誤，引起歧義。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表達不引起歧義。因此：有時間一味反駁，還不如指出具體改進在第幾頁、第幾段。 =

8、Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #3: While revising the script, it is to be suggested that author should clearly indicate the aim & scope of the study and while making conclusion, it is to be mentioned how the study is us eful for the practical purposes. In addition the following are the few sug

9、gestions/comments, whic h may be included while revision.Introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambiguous statement i.e., much work is still ahead, may indicate properly.2. Author could not demonstrate the reason why, to select the organic compound such as ethyl p yruvate

10、 for this study?3. Experimental part: It is difficult to understand the in-situ RAIRS experiments with homemade li quid-solid RAIRS cell. More detailed information may be useful for the others those who are work ing in the area. Photograph of the assembled cell may be included.4. The description giv

11、en for the experimental set up (page 4) can be presented by flow diagram in stead, as an ease to understand the set up.5. Resluts Part (Page 6): "CO adlayers with identical monolayer coverages", the monolayer covera ge, is it been performed with some adsorption model? Further, it was sugge

12、sted that CO-saturate d Pt surface, but not mentioned about the saturation experiments. Is it obtained after 60 min of CO bubbling?6. Page 12, 2nd para: The displacement of EtPy by CCl4 flushing, is it confirmed by the EtPy peaks ? If so, it has to be mentioned clearly in the para. Also in the same

13、para, author referred for Fig. 7 a and 7b but in the figures, it didn't appear, only figure 7 appeared. I feel it refers for figure 7, por tion A and B, to be corrected. Similarly, in the text referred the fig 2a, 2b. etc but on the figure sh eet it is mentioned as 2A, 2B .etc. to be corrected.7

14、. Page 14, 1st para: 'contamination of the Pt surface by corrosion of o-rings in high concentratio n EtPy', but the statement has not been supported by other evidence/literature.8. Pages 14 through 17: the observed reactivity of various solvents for adsorbedCO on the Pt surface (figs 3 &

15、 4) has to be discussed more precisely. This reviewer is unable to foll ow the reason why they showed different reactivity, is it principally due to the organic moieties, o r due to the impurities of commercially available chemicals or a mixed effect. It has to be clearly d emonstrated, however, the

16、 only experiment performed with CO/water? CCl4 would difficult to de scribe it in detail.9. The author try to restrain with repeated arguments in the text e.g., page 3 para 1: It was gener alized that, also appeared on page 21 first para.10. Captions of the figures are too long, the detailed descrip

17、tion already given in the text, hencewould not be included here. Captions should be short and crispy.= Dear Editor,I quite appreciate your favorite consideration and the reviewer s insightful comments. Now I have revised the JCIS-06-247 exactly according to the reviewer s comments, and found these c

18、omments are very helpful. I hope this revision can make my paper more acceptable. The revisions were addressed point by point below.general The objective of this research was added at the beginning of the third paragraph of Intr oduction. How the study is useful for practical purposes was added at t

19、he end of Conclusion as o ne paragraph.1 Ambiguous statement i.e., “ much work is still ahead ” was deleted.2 Ethyl pyruvate was used here as a typical compound (containing two carbonyl groups) to dem onstrate the feasibility of using our diagnosing tool to detect low-coverage CO (coming from deca r

20、bonylation of EtPy) at the liquid-solid interface. EtPy is a reactant used in liquid-phase chiral cata lysis, and slight decomposition of EtPy to adsorbed CO was reported to influence the catalytic per formance. In addition, by studying that, we can directly compare our results with previous studies

21、 . More details in the first paragraph of Section 3.2.3 The IR cell was designed according to the IR cells used by many electrochemical workers. Refe rences were added. A photo was given in the Supporting Information.4 A flow diagram of the experimental setup was given in the new Fig. 1.5 The CO ads

22、orption experiments were performed in the same adsorption mode, by bubbling C O through a clean Pt surface in different days to achieve the same saturation coverage of CO. Initi al experiments indicated that given the CO bubbling rate was 0.85 cm3/min, CO can saturate on P t after 30-45 min. We bubb

23、le CO for 60 min to guarantee the same CO coverage. If we bubble CO for more time, or if we increase the CO flowing rate several times, the CO saturation coverage do esn t change, indicating 60 min is already enough. A figure showing the CO uptake as afunction of bubbling time was given in the Suppo

24、rting Information.6 The displacement of EtPy by CCl4 was confirmed by the removing of EtPy peaks. The mention of Fig. 7a and 7b etc. throughout the text were all corrected.7 It is known that some solvents such as acetone can corrode the Viton o-ring. We saw the dam age of o-ring after using high-con

25、centration EtPy. A reference to the Viton o-ring information was given.8 The observed reactivity trend is due to a combination of both effects, with the accumulation o f organic moieties on Pt surface during numerous flushing cycles the more important reason. A fe w proper sentences were added to cl

26、arity this point.9 The repeated arguments in the first paragraph in Section 4.3 were deleted.10 The too-long captions were significantly shortened.In all, I found the reviewer s comments are quite helpful, and I revised my paper point-by-point. Thank you and the review a gain for your help!=結果：=2 Et

27、hyl pyruvate was used here as a typical compound (containing two carbonyl groups) to dem onstrate the feasibility of using our diagnosing tool to detect low-coverage CO (coming from deca rbonylation of EtPy) at the liquid-solid interface. EtPy is a reactant used in liquid-phase chiral cata lysis, an

28、d slight decomposition of EtPy to adsorbed CO was reported to influence the catalytic per formance. In addition, by studying that, we can directly compare our results with previous studies . More details in the first paragraph of Section 3.2.3 The IR cell was designed according to the IR cells used

29、by many electrochemical workers. Refe rences were added. A photo was given in the Supporting Information.4 A flow diagram of the experimental setup was given in the new Fig. 1.5 The CO adsorption experiments were performed in the same adsorption mode, by bubbling C O through a clean Pt surface in di

30、fferent days to achieve the same saturation coverage of CO. Initi al experiments indicated that given the CO bubbling rate was 0.85 cm3/min, CO can saturate on P t after 30-45 min. We bubble CO for 60 min to guarantee the same CO coverage. If we bubble CO for more time, or if we increase the CO flow

31、ing rate several times, the CO saturation coverage do esn t change, indicating 60 min is already enough. A figure showing the CO uptake as afunction of bubbling time was given in the Supporting Information.6 The displacement of EtPy by CCl4 was confirmed by the removing of EtPy peaks. The mention of

32、 Fig. 7a and 7b etc. throughout the text were all corrected.7 It is known that some solvents such as acetone can corrode the Viton o-ring. We saw the dam age of o-ring after using high-concentration EtPy. A reference to the Viton o-ring information was given.8 The observed reactivity trend is due to

33、 a combination of both effects, with the accumulation o f organic moieties on Pt surface during numerous flushing cycles the more important reason. A fe w proper sentences were added to clarity this point.9 The repeated arguments in the first paragraph in Section 4.3 were deleted.10 The too-long cap

34、tions were significantly shortened.In all, I found the reviewer s comments are quite helpful, and I revised my paper point-by-point. Thank you and the review a gain for your help!=結果：=/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.005CI 修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板修改稿回答審稿人的意見（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Rev

35、iewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled“ Paper Title” （ID: 文章稿號 ）. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as w ell as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully a nd have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red i n the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer s comments are as flowing:Responds to the r