SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19991 SELECTION TOOL 選擇供應商的工具選擇供應商的工具 SUPPLIER INFORMATION 供應商信息 Supplier name 供應商名稱 Phone 電話 Fax 傳真 Corporate headquarters address 總部地址 Supplier web page address 網址 Contact name title 聯系人 Phone 電話 Fax 傳真 Contact address 聯系地址 Contact email EMAIL Other important information 其他重要信息 SQE ANALYSIS SQE 分析 Weight 比重 Supplier A 供應商 A Supplier B 供應商 B Supplier C 供應商 C RTS Readiness Supplier s Outgoing Quality Level DPPM 供應商出貨品質水平 DPPM Supplier s Customers Line Reject Rate 供應商客戶的廠內不良率 Supplier s Customers Field Reject Rate 供應商客戶的市場不良率 Forecasted LRR Customer 預估的客戶產線不良率 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19992 Forecasted IFIR Customer CUSTOMER 的預期初始市場不良率 Quality System 品質系統 Quality Resources 品質資源 TOTAL weighted 總計總計 100 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19993 SQE WORKSHEET SQE 工作表 RTS READINESSSCORE 分數 Detail How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing and does the compatibility of the design meet Customer s needs 說明 產品需要多長時間才能成功導入 CUSTOMER 生產 設計能力是否可以滿足 CUSTOMER 需求 Scoring 1Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible 分數 時間及品質具有高風險性 配合度差 2Represents medium risk to schedule or quality compatible 時間及品質具有中等風險性 配合度好 3Represents low risk to schedule or quality compatible 時間及品質具有低風險性 配合度好 4No risk to schedule or quality compatible 時間及品質無風險性 配合度好 Comments 備注 SUPPLIER S OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL DPPMSCORE 供應商出貨品質等級 DPPM Detail Supplier s history 說明 供應商的歷史狀況 Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates analyzing categorizing reasons for failures and taking appropriate corrective actions 供應商能夠計算出不良率 分析失效原因并加以分類 并能夠剔除有效的改善對策 Scoring 1Supplier does not measure DPPM rate 分數 供應商無法計算出不良率 2Supplier measures DPPM rate however there is no analysis pareto or corrective action 供應商能夠計算出不良率 但無法提供分析及改善對策 3Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis pareto however no corrective action is taken 供應商能夠計算出不良率 能夠剔除原因分析 但是無法提供改善對策 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19994 4Supplier measures DPPM rate performs analysis pareto and has effective corrective action system 供應商能夠計算出不良率 提供原因分析及有效的改善對策 GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION 主要的市場不良資訊 a Agree to Customer s DPPM goals Yes goals are No 是否達到 CUSTOMER 不良率目標 是 目標是 否 b Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals Yes plan attached Plan promised by 是否有確保達到不良率目標的計劃 是 相關計劃 計劃確定人 Comments 備注 SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATESSCORE 供應商客戶的廠內不良率 分數 Detail Supplier s customers history Customer s current goal 說明 供應商的歷史狀況 CUSTOMER 的現行目標 Scoring 1Supplier s customers LRR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分數 供應商客戶的長期不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現行目標值的 2 倍 2Supplier s customers LRR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater 供應商客戶的長期不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現行目標值 但是小于其 2 倍 3Supplier s customers LRR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應商客戶的長期不良率基本與 CUSTOMER 現行目標一致 4Supplier s customers LRR is better than Customer s current goal 供應商客戶的長期不良率優于 CUSTOMER 現行目標值 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19995 SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESSCORE 供應商客戶的市場不良率 分數 Detail Supplier s customers history Customer s current goal 說明 供應商客戶的歷史狀況 CUSTOMER 現行目標 Scoring 1Supplier s customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分數 供應商客戶的市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現行目標值的 2 倍 2Supplier s customers FIR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater CUSTOMER 客戶的市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現行目標 但低于其 2 倍 3Supplier s customers FIR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應商客戶的市場不良率基本與 CUSTOMER 現行目標值一致 4Supplier s customers FIR is better than Customer s current goal 供應商客戶的市場不良率優于 CUSTOMER 現行目標值 FORECASTED LRR CUSTOMERSCORE 預期的CUSTOMER產線不良率 分數 DETAIL SUPPLIER S FORECASTED CUSTOMER S CURRENT GOAL 說明 供應商的預估值 CUSTOMER 的現行目標 Scoring 1Supplier s LRR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分數 供應商的產線不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現行目標值的 2 倍 2Supplier s LRR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater 供應商的產線不良率超過 CUSTOMER 的現行目標值 但低于其 2 倍 3Supplier s LRR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應商的產線不良率基本與 CUSTOMER 現行目標值一致 4Supplier s LRR is better than Customer s current goal 供應商的產線不良率優于 CUSTOMER 現行目標值 FORECASTED IFIR CUSTOMERSCORE 預期的CUSTOMER早期市場不良率 分數 Detail Supplier s forecasted Customer s current goal SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19996 說明 供應商的預估值 CUSTOMER 的現行目標值 Scoring 1Supplier s IFIR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分數 供應商的早期市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現行目標值的 2 倍 2Supplier s IFIR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater 供應商的早期市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 的現行目標值 但低于其 2 倍 3Supplier s IFIR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應商的早期市場不良率基本于 CUSTOMER 現行目標值一致 4Supplier s IFIR is better than Customer s current goal 供應商的早期市場不良率優于 CUSTOMER 現行目標 QUALITY SYSTEMSCORE 品質系統 分數 Detail 細則 a ISO Certification 1 Yes circle one 9001 9002 0 No a ISO 認證 b Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges b 品質系統稽核得分 0Less than 70 Not Approved 2Between 70 89 Conditionally Approved 4Between 90 100 Approved QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE 品質資源 分數 Detail 細則 The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues Additionally Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site 供應商應當建立專門的品保系統 足夠的品保員工參與品質問題的解決 任命品保經理 參與公司決策 另外供應商還要在每個制造廠任命一名 JQE Scoring 1Inadequate resources 系統不健全 2Quality staff however no Quality Manager 有品保員工 但沒有專職品保經理 3Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager 有品保員工和專職品保經理 4Quality Department Quality Manager and willing to appoint a JQE SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1