




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
閱讀表達
--就某事發表觀點(篇章4)閱讀下面短文,根據題目要求用英文回答問題。Anewstudyasksthequestion:Doconversationsendwhenpeoplewantthemto?Theanswerisno.Thestudyincludedtwoparts.Thefirstpartwasanonlinesurveythatasked806peoplewhethertherewasamomentrecentlytheyhadwantedtoendaconversationwithaclosefriendandtoestimatewhenthatmomentwasinrelationtowhenthetalkreacheditsconclusion.Thesecondpartinvolved252peoplepairedupwithstrangersinalabtochataboutwhatevertheyfeltlikeforanywherebetweenoneand45minutes.67percentoftherespondentsinthefirstpartofthestudysaidtheywantedtheconversationtoendbeforeitactuallydid,andmosthadsecretlywishedthechathadbeeneither50percentlongeror50percentshorterthanitwas.“Whateveryouthinktheotherpersonwants,youmaywellbewrong,”saysAdamMastroianni,apsychologyresearcheratHarvardUniversityandthestudy’sleadauthor.“Soyoumightaswellleavewhenitseemsappropriate,becauseit’sbettertobeleftwantingmorethanless.”Inthesecondpartofthestudy,nearly70percentofthepeoplereportedwantingtheconversationtobeoverbeforeitended.Justtwopercentoftheconversationswrappedupatatimebothpeoplewerehappywith,and30percentofthemendedwhenoneofthepartieswanted.Theresearchersalsoaskedstudyparticipantstoguesswhentheirconversationalpartnershadwantedtostoptalking.Thoseguesseswerewrong,eitheroverorunderestimatingtheotherperson’sdesiretocontinuethetalk,byabout64percentoftheconversation’sactuallength.Takentogether,theresultssuggestthatwearen’tveryskilledatestimatingeachothers’desiresaboutwhentoendaconversation.ThaliaWheatley,asocialpsychologistatDartmouthCollegesaysthefindingsareimportant,addingthatconversationsare“anelegantexpressionofjointcooperation”.However,shesays,“Itallfallsapartattheendbecausewejustcan’tfigureoutwhentostop.”Mastroiannisayshistakeawayisthattryingtoguesswhatsomeoneyou’rechattingwithwantsisalmostpointless.“Youreallyhavenoideawhentheotherpersonwantstogo.Somaybe,stoptryingandjustrelaxandenjoytheconversation.”40.Wherewerethetwopartsofthestudycarriedout?41.Inwhatwayweretheparticipants’guesseswronginthesecondpartofthestudy?42.Pleasedecidewhichpartisfalseinthefollowingstatement,thenunderlineitandexplainwhy.It’seasytofindapropertimetoendaconversationwithaclosefriend.43.Ifyoudesiretoendaconversation,wouldyoutelltheotherpersondirectly?Whyorwhynot?(Inabout40words)Newstudyasksthequestion:Doconversationsendwhenpeoplewantthemto?Theanswerisno.Thestudyincludedtwoparts.Thefirstpartwasanonlinesurveythatasked806peoplewhethertherewasamomentrecentlytheyhadwantedtoendaconversationwithaclosefriendandtoestimatewhenthatmomentwasinrelationtowhenthetalkreacheditsconclusion.Thesecondpartinvolved252peoplepairedupwithstrangersinalabtochataboutwhatevertheyfeltlikeforanywherebetweenoneand45minutes.67percentoftherespondentsinthefirstpartofthestudysaidtheywantedtheconversationtoendbeforeitactuallydid,andmosthadsecretlywishedthechathadbeeneither50percentlongeror50percentshorterthanitwas.“Whateveryouthinktheotherpersonwants,youmaywellbewrong,”saysAdamMastroianni,apsychologyresearcheratHarvardUniversityandthestudy’sleadauthor.“Soyoumightaswellleavewhenitseemsappropriate,becauseit’sbettertobeleftwantingmorethanless.”Inthesecondpartofthestudy,nearly70percentofthepeoplereportedwantingtheconversationtobeoverbeforeitended.Justtwopercentoftheconversationswrappedupatatimebothpeoplewerehappywith,and30percentofthemendedwhenoneofthepartieswanted.Theresearchersalsoaskedstudyparticipantstoguesswhentheirconversationalpartnershadwantedtostoptalking.Thoseguesseswerewrong,eitheroverorunderestimatingtheotherperson’sdesiretocontinuethetalk,byabout64percentoftheconversation’sactuallength.Takentogether,theresultssuggestthatwearen’tveryskilledatestimatingeachothers’desiresaboutwhentoendaconversation.ThaliaWheatley,asocialpsychologistatDartmouthCollegesaysthefindingsareimportant,addingthatconversationsare“anelegantexpressionofjointcooperation”.However,shesays,“Itallfallsapartattheendbecausewejustcan’tfigureoutwhentostop.”Mastroiannisayshistakeawayisthattryingtoguesswhatsomeoneyou’rechattingwithwantsisalmostpointless.“Youreallyhavenoideawhentheotherpersonwantstogo.Somaybe,stoptryingandjustrelaxandenjoytheconversation.”第一段what:人們不會直接結束對話第2-7段how:實驗過程第8-10段why實驗啟示:我們應該直接結束對話/原因40.Wherewerethetwopartsofthestudycarriedout?原文:Thefirstpartwasanonlinesurveythatasked806peoplewhethertherewasamomentrecentlytheyhadwantedtoendaconversationwithaclosefriendandtoestimatewhenthatmomentwasinrelationtowhenthetalkreacheditsconclusion.Thesecondpartinvolved252peoplepairedupwithstrangersinalabtochataboutwhatevertheyfeltlikeforanywherebetweenoneand45minutes.答案:Onlineandinalab.40/41題目解答技巧:1原文定位2加工信息3訂正語法(人稱/時態)41.Inwhatwayweretheparticipants’guesseswronginthesecondpartofthestudy?原文:Thoseguesseswerewrong,eitheroverorunderestimatingtheotherperson’sdesiretocontinuethetalk,byabout64percentoftheconversation’sactuallength.答案:42.Pleasedecidewhichpartisfalseinthefollowingstatement,thenunderlineitandexplainwhy.It’seasytofindapropertimetoendaconversationwithaclosefriend.原文:Takentogether,theresultssuggestthatwearen’tveryskilledatestimatingeachothers’desiresaboutwhentoendaconversation.Mastroiannisayshistakeawayisthattryingtoguesswhatsomeoneyou’rechattingwithwantsisalmostpointless.“Youreallyhavenoideawhentheotherpersonwantstogo.答案:Accordingtothepassate,itisnoteasy/difficulttofindapropertimetoendaconversationwithaclosefriends,becausewearen’tveryskilledatestimatingeachothers’desireaboutwhentoendaconversation.43.Ifyoudesiretoendaconversation,wouldyoutelltheotherpersondirectly?Whyorwhynot?(Inabout40words)原文觀點總結:Takentogether,theresultssuggestthatwearen’tveryskilledatestimatingeachothers’desiresaboutwhentoendaconversation.ThaliaWheatley,asocialpsychologistatDartmouthCollegesaysthefindingsareimportant,addingthatconversationsare“anelegantexpressionofjointcooperation”.However,shesays,“Itallfallsapartattheendbecausewejustcan’tfigureoutwhentostop.”Mastroiannisayshistakeawayisthattryingtoguesswhatsomeoneyou’rechattingwithwantsisalmostpointless.“Youreallyhavenoideawhentheotherpersonwantstogo.Somaybe,stoptryingandjustrelaxandenjoytheconversation.”答題思路:shouldendtheconversationdirectly:1.itispointless/ineffective/timeconsuming/awasteoftimearen’tskilledatestimatingother’sintentionofwhentoendhavenoideaofother’sintentionofwhentowrapup...2.beastraightforwardperson3.can’tfocusontheconversation4.theconversationwillfallapartintoembarrassmentshouldn’tendtheconversationdirectly:1.isimpolite/rude/tointerruptothers2.harmtheself-respectoftheotherperson3.reducetheirwillingnesstocommunicate4.ruinrelationship/breakthebond總結觀點類寫作結構:觀點
原因1+解釋(原因2+解釋)答案1:Yes.Firslty,Itisawasteoftimetocontinuetheconversationaswearenotskilledatestimatingwhentheotherpersonwantstowrapitup.Secondly,Ithinkitineffectivetocontinuetheunwantedtalk,whichcan’tgetmefocusedandwillendupwithemb
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025《設備采購合同模板》
- 2025技術開發委托合同
- 2025計算機軟件購銷合同范本
- 2025財產信托合同樣本
- 2025年太陽能組件生產裝備項目建議書
- 2025年專用改性型氯化聚乙烯合作協議書
- 2025年稀有金屬及稀土金屬材料合作協議書
- 2025年聚氧乙烯醚項目建議書
- 2025年高純高碳鉻軸承鋼及滲碳軸承鋼合作協議書
- 樓房打樁施工方案
- CAD輸入文字時提示“找不到主詞典無法啟動拼寫檢查程序”怎么辦
- -活出心花怒放的生命 課件 心理健康
- 給水泵檢修方案
- 設備出入庫管理辦法
- KEGG代謝通路中文翻譯
- 消火栓月檢查表
- GB∕T 17832-2021 銀合金首飾 銀含量的測定 溴化鉀容量法(電位滴定法)
- 低成本自動化的開展與案例77頁PPT課件
- 人防工程竣工資料(全套)
- 梅州市部分飲用水源保護區調整方案
- “重慶環保”標志說明
評論
0/150
提交評論