一些英文審稿意見的模板一些英文審稿意見的模板一些英文審稿意見的模板xxx公司一些英文審稿意見的模板文件編號：文件日期：修訂次數：第1.0次更改批準審核制定方案設計，管理制度一些英文審稿意見的模板【轉】來源：Elaine王倩的日志

最近導師讓我幫忙審了兩篇英文文章，覺得寫的都不怎么樣，頓時覺得自己的也不太差吧嘿嘿。但是怎么寫評審還是有經驗需要學習，自己也不能寫的太不專業。不過我的意見也不過是給老師寫意見的一個參考，具體能不能過我就毋須多言了。網上找來一些零碎的資料參考參考。+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目標和結果不清晰。ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.2、未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分。Ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.Furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.3、對于研究設計的rationale:Also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.4、夸張地陳述結論/夸大成果/不嚴謹：Theconclusionsareoverstated.Forexample,thestudydidnotshowifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.5、對hypothesis的清晰界定：Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。6、對某個概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念：Whatwastherationaleforthefilm/SBFvolumeratio？

7、對研究問題的定義：Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem8、如何凸現原創性以及如何充分地寫literaturereview:Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.

9、對claim,如A＞B的證明，verification:

Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.

10、嚴謹度問題：

MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.

11、格式（重視程度）：

Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.Ihaveattachedapdffilewith"InstructionsforAuthors"whichshowsexamples.

Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.Ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenunderthe"InstructionsandForms"buttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.

12、語言問題（出現最多的問題）：

有關語言的審稿人意見：

ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.Aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.Thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinEnglishorwhosenativelanguageisEnglish.PleasehavesomeonecompetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectitthequalityofEnglishneedsimproving.

作為審稿人，本不應該把編輯部的這些信息公開（冒風險啊），但我覺得有些意見值得廣大投稿人注意，就貼出來吧，當然，有關審稿人的名字，Email，文章題名信息等就都刪除了，以免造成不必要的麻煩！希望朋友們多評價，其他有經驗的審稿人能常來指點大家！國人一篇文章投Mater.類知名國際雜志，被塞爾維亞一審稿人打25分！個人認為文章還是有一些創新的，所以作為審稿人我就給了66分，（這個分正常應該足以發表），提了一些修改意見，望作者修改后發表！登錄到編輯部網頁一看，一個文章竟然有六個審稿人，詳細看了下打的分數，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但沒有打分（另一國人審），最后一個沒有回來！兩個拒的是需要我們反思和學習的！（括號斜體內容為我注解）Reviewer4ReviewerRecommendationTerm:RejectOverallReviewerManuscriptRating:25CommentstoEditor:Reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.Pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.Title(Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.):Prof.Name:XXXAffiliation:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxManuscriptentitled"SynthesisXXX。。。。。。。。。。。"ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandinavarietyofforms.Thismanuscriptdoesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly(seeRemark1).Presentationandwritingisratherpoor;thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata(forsomeseeRemarks2)andevensomeflaws(seeRemark3).ForthesereasonsIsuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentform.1.ThepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofXXXX,but:-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofXXXXpowders(INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),（通常的寫作格式，審稿人實際上很在意的）-ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,(INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofXXXXXXbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone(INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod(ABSTRACT,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION,CONCLUSIONS).（很多人不會寫這個地方，大家多學習啊）2.WhendiscussingXRDdataXXXauthors-statethatXXXXX-statethatXXXX-Thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,particlesize？

（很多人用XRD，結