1、RESIDENTIAL DESIGNON IRREGULAR SITE CONDITIONSBySean T. FriedoDecember 6, 2010A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The State University of New York at Buffalo In partial fulfillment of the degree requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture Department of ArchitectureA

2、CKNOWLEDGMENTSMany thanks to Dennis A. Andrejko, Gary Day and Lynda Schneekloth for their guidance and inspiration throughout the years and for helping to make this thesis a reality.Thank you to my family and friends for all their support.Special thanks to:Marie Wrynn&Michael D. RossWithout you,

3、 the completion of this thesis would not have been possible.This thesis is dedicated to the memory of Deborah Rose Molnar.Table of ContentsThesis Abstractpg.viiIn troductio npg.10Defin iti on of an Irregular Sitepg.13Precede nt Studypg.17Falli ng Water by Frank Lloyd Wrightpg.17The Boulder House by

4、Charles Forma n Joh nson pg. 22Casa Malaparte by Curzio Malapartepg.25The Reeve Reside nce by Jim Cutlerpg.33The Rose Reside nce by En gele n Moore Architectsg. 38The Berkowitz House by Steve n Hollpg. 42Client, Program and Design Intentionspg.48Site Analysispg.52Desig npg.61Final Draw ings Packagep

5、g. 78Alter nate Desig npg. 94Summarypg.105Conclusionpg.108Thesis AbstractStatement of Issue/Problem:Why are most atypical building sites, sites that are not flat and/or sites that are filled with things such as hills, valleys, rocks, trees etc., either mechanically altered to fit the status quo or a

6、bandoned altogether? I intend to explore the issues that lead to the widespread use of regular sites, sites that are virtually flat with little or no defining characteristics, for the typical family home. When choosing a site, are the financial issues truly as significant as they appear or are there

7、 other factors at play? Statement of Significance of Issue:The typical family home need not be so“ typical ” ; in fact, uniqueness of design canstem from the uniqueness of site. There may be reasons to ignore a site due to its complexity, but there could be many more reasons why an irregular site co

8、uld lead to a much more gratifying architectural design. Residential design does not need to begin or end on a flat, featureless site.Method of Inquiry:Through this exploration I have uncovered the pros and cons of dealing with an irregular site from all aspects. After studying several relevant prec

9、edents I compiled what I have learned. Last, I chose an irregular site and developed a design for it, keeping in mind all of the issues presented to me, both positive and negative.Expected Outcome:I expect to gain a complete understanding of all the aspects of dealing with an irregular site. I also

10、intend to produce a bound volume that will explain this in detail and will also identify what steps one would need to take to complete a successful residential design on an irregular site.不規則的場地條件下的住宅設計作者 Sean T. Friedo 時間 2010年12月6日達到建筑本論文滿足紐約州立大學布法羅分校對學院研究生院的完成度的要求， 系建筑學碩士的程度。非常感謝加里 丹尼斯 A. Andrejk

11、o、Gary Day和Lynda Schneekloth 這些年來 的指導、啟發和幫助，是他們使本論文成為現實。謝謝我的家人和朋友的全力支 持。特別感謝：Marie Wrynn 和 Michael D. Ross如果沒有你們，這篇論文是不可能完成的。謹以此文表達我對德博拉 羅斯莫爾納的追憶。目錄1緒論12 弓I 言 73不規則場地的定義104 案例分析134.1流水別墅一弗蘭克勞埃德賴特174.2博爾德住宅一查爾斯福爾曼約翰遜224.3 Casa Malaparte 住宅一Curzio Malaparte 254.4里夫住宅一吉姆卡特勒 334.5玫瑰住宅一恩格倫摩爾事務所384.6玫瑰住宅一

12、Berkowitz住宅一斯蒂文 霍爾385甲方，項目和設計意圖486基地分析527設計內容528最終設計圖紙619設計內容5210不同的設計思路6111設計總結7812結論9413參考文獻105論文摘要關于議題的聲明： 為什么對于最非典型的建筑基地 -不平整的基地或是充滿了山丘，峽谷，巖石， 樹木等的基地，我們的處理方式是， 以機械的方式改變它來適應現狀或者完全放 棄處理呢？我打算探索的這個問題， 導致了設計者為典型的家庭設計住宅時， 廣 泛選擇了正常的基地 -基本是平坦的，很少甚至沒有特征。當選擇一個場地時， 造價問題真正像它們所表現的那么重要，還是有其他因素在起作用呢？ 關于議題的意義的聲明： 典型的家庭住宅的用地不需要那么 “典型 ”，事實上，獨特的設計可能來源于場地 的獨特性。 這也可能是由于場地復雜性而忽視它的原因 ，但也有可能是為什么一 個不規則的基地可能會導致更令人欣喜的建筑設計的原因。 住宅設計并不需要甚 至不應該或在平坦的，沒有特色的場地上開始或竣工。調查方法：通過這種探索，我已經發現了一個不規則的現場， 從各個方面處理的優點和缺點。 學習一些相關的案例后， 我整理了我所學到的知識。 最后， 我選擇了一個不規則的場地，帶著到所有對我提出的問題， 了一個設計。預期結果： 我希望能對處理不規則的場地的問題，