




VIP免費下載
版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、TOEFL iBT Complete Practice Test TPO 30 Writing Section 1No. of Questions: 2OKV26 V 1.0.2Begin readingYou have 3 minutes to read the passage.Click to begin reading now .A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port cityof Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Gr
2、eeks defendedthemselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus the Suns rays onto Roman ships, causing them to catch fire. However, we have several reasons to suspect that the story of the burning mirror is just a myth and the Greeks of Syracuse
3、 never rally built such a device.First, the ancient Greeks were not technologically advanced enough to make such a device. A mirror that would focus sunlight with sufficient intensity to set ships on fire would have to be several meters wide.Moreover, the mirror would have to have a very precise par
4、abolic curvature(a curvature derived from a geometric shape known as the parabola). The technology for manufacturing a large sheet of copper with such specifications did not exist in the ancient world.Second, the burning mirror would have taken a long time to set the ships on fire. In an experiment
5、conducted to determine whether a burning mirror was feasible, a device concentrating the Suns rays on a wooden object 30 meters away took ten minutes to set the object on fire; and during that time, the object had to be unmoving. It is unlikely that Roman ships stayed perfectly still for that much t
6、ime, Such a weapon would therefore have been very impractical and ineffective.Third, a burning mirror does not seem like an improvement on a weaponthat the Greeks already had: flaming arrows. Shooting at an enemys ships with flaming arrows was a common way of setting the ships on fire. The burning m
7、irror and flaming arrows would have been effective at about the same distance. So the Greeks had no reason to build a weapon like a burning mirror.V26 V 1.0.2TPO小站-托福精品資料下載論壇You may have to wait a few seconds for the audio to load and play.V26 V 1.0.2Directions: You have 20 minute
8、s to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well yourresponse presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.Question: Summarize the
9、 points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific point made in the reading passage.A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defendedthemselves with an ingenious weapon ca
10、lled a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus the Suns rays onto Roman ships, causing them to catch fire. However, we have several reasons to suspect that the story of the burning mirror is just a myth and the Greeks of Syracuse never rally built such a device.Write your respons
11、e here.換行請按Ctrl+EnterFirst, the ancient Greeks were not technologically advanced enough to make such a device. A mirror that would focus sunlight with sufficient intensity to set ships on fire would have to be several meters wide.Moreover, the mirror would have to have a very precise parabolic curva
12、ture(a curvature derived from a geometric shape known as the parabola). The technology for manufacturing a large sheet of copper with such specifications did not exist in the ancient world.Second, the burning mirror would have taken a long time to set the ships on fire. In an experiment conducted to
13、 determine whether a burning mirror was feasible, a device concentrating the Suns rays on a wooden object 30 meters away took ten minutes to set the object on fire; and during that time, the object had to be unmoving. It is unlikely that Roman ships stayed perfectly still for that much time, Such a
14、weapon would therefore have been very impractical and ineffective.Third, a burning mirror does not seem like an improvement on a weaponthat the Greeks already had: flaming arrows. Shooting at an enemys ships with flaming arrows was a common way of setting the ships on fire. The burning mirror and fl
15、aming arrows would have been effective at about the same distance. So the Greeks had no reason to build a weapon like a burning mirror.V26 V 1.0.2Write your response here.換行請按Ctrl+EnterQuestion:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support your
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 信貸風險評估模型-洞察闡釋
- 3D交互在增強現實中的應用-洞察闡釋
- 托班十一月份工作計劃
- 軟件工程培養計劃
- 旗袍行業財務計劃
- 溫州平陽縣中小學教師招聘筆試真題2024
- 河南鄭州惠科光電有限公司招聘筆試真題2024
- 關于學前教育論文
- 燕京理工學院《鋼琴與伴奏》2023-2024學年第二學期期末試卷
- 哈爾濱遠東理工學院《基礎俄語三》2023-2024學年第二學期期末試卷
- 2025年九年級語文中考最后一練口語交際(全國版)(含解析)
- 一例高血壓護理個案
- 延遲退休政策驅動中國第二次人口紅利的多維度解析與展望
- 2025山東濟南屬國有企業招聘41人筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解析
- 2025年廣東省深圳市龍崗區中考英語二模試卷
- 江蘇揚州中學2024-2025學年數學高二下期末經典試題含解析
- 本科評估畢業5年學生的專業培養目標達成情況分析
- 創新網絡中的溢出效應:生產網絡中的擴散機制
- 人工智能訓練師4級模擬復習測試卷附答案
- 國際壓力性損傷-潰瘍預防和治療臨床指南(2025年版)解讀課件
- 公司安全事故隱患內部舉報、報告獎勵制度
評論
0/150
提交評論