德勤 -2025醫療科技領域投資格局研究報告:“先建后買”模式能否成為新前沿 -Traversing the medtech investment landscape Is build-to-buy the next frontier_第1頁
德勤 -2025醫療科技領域投資格局研究報告:“先建后買”模式能否成為新前沿 -Traversing the medtech investment landscape Is build-to-buy the next frontier_第2頁
德勤 -2025醫療科技領域投資格局研究報告:“先建后買”模式能否成為新前沿 -Traversing the medtech investment landscape Is build-to-buy the next frontier_第3頁
德勤 -2025醫療科技領域投資格局研究報告:“先建后買”模式能否成為新前沿 -Traversing the medtech investment landscape Is build-to-buy the next frontier_第4頁
德勤 -2025醫療科技領域投資格局研究報告:“先建后買”模式能否成為新前沿 -Traversing the medtech investment landscape Is build-to-buy the next frontier_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩22頁未讀 繼續免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

Deloitte.

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape

Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

2

Contents

Introduction

3

1.Medtechmarkettrends:Howaretraditional

investmentstreamschanging?

4

2.Build-to-buyandother

co-developmentarrangements

6

3.Governanceinsightsforcomplexdealstructures

8

4.Thecurrentinvestmentlandscapeinmedtech

9

5.Wordsofwisdomfortoday’sinnovators

12

AuthorsandAcknowledgments13

Endnotes

1

4

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

Introduction

Eightyearsago,Deloitteraisedtheissueaboutfadinginvestmentactivityinearly-stagemedicaltechnology(medtech)companies.Our

2017paper

notedthatsomeentrepreneurswerefindingitincreasinglychallengingtosecureventurecapital(VC)investment,whichmadeitdifficulttopushsomeinnovationstothenext

stageofdevelopment.

Manystartupcompanieswerecaughtbetweentheirinitialroundsoffundingandthedevelopmentofacommerciallyviableproduct.Sincethen,thejourneyhasbecomelonger,moretreacherous,andlesscertainforearly-stagemedtechcompanies.Evenifproduct

developmentrunssmoothlyandcapitalflowssteadily,itcantakeadecadeormoretobringanewdevicetomarket.Inadditionto

financialchallenges,somecompaniescanfaceregulatorychallengesandreimbursementuncertaintiespriortocommercialization.

Intheyearssinceour2017paper,wehavesuggestedthatinvestors,strategic/incumbentmedtechcompanies,andentrepreneurs

consideraco-developmentdealstructure—suchasbuild-to-buy—asapossiblealternativetomoretraditionalinvestmentstrategies.

Whilethebuild-to-buymodelhasbeenusedfordecadesinthe

pharmaceuticalsector,1itisjustbeginningtogainsometractioninmedtech.Underthismodel,astrategicmedtechcompanyagrees

toacquireastartupcompany,oritsassets,atapredetermined

priceoncethestartupreachescertainmilestones.Ifthatstartup

succeeds,thestrategiccompanycanexerciseacalloptiontoacquireitatthepre-negotiatedprice.Whilethisarrangementcanprovide

thestartupwithsomefinancialsecurityandapathforward,therearenoguaranteesitwillbeacquired.Abuild-to-buymodelcould

alsolimittheupsidefortheinnovatorifaproductexceedsmarketexpectations.Forthestrategic,outsourcinginnovationtoastartupcancreateanoff-the-balance-sheetwaytofundinnovationwhile

avoidinginternalresearchanddevelopment(R&D)expenses.Beforeenteringintothistypeofarrangement,expectationsandrisks

shouldbeclearlyoutlinedforallpartiesinvolved.

Alternativefinancingmodelsarebeingdiscussedmorefrequentlyamongstakeholders.Caseinpoint:AtLSI’sannualEmerging

MedtechSummitinMarch2025,threeconferencesessionsweredevotedtobuild-to-buy.2However,conferencepanelistsnotedthatthemodelisstillrelativelynewinmedtech.Bothfailures

andsuccesseswerehighlightedduringthosesessions.

Deloitterecentlyinterviewed16leadersofVC,privateequity(PE),andcorporateventurecapital(CVC)firms,alongwithstrategic

investors,tolearnmoreabouttheshiftinginvestmentlandscapeinmedtech.Duringtheinterviews,weexploredfivekeytopics:

1.Medtechmarkettrends

2.Build-to-buyandotherco-developmentarrangements

3.Governanceinsightsforcomplexdealstructures

4.Thecurrentinvestmentlandscapeinmedtech

5.Wordsofwisdomfortoday’sinnovators

3

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

4

1.Medtechmarkettrends:Howare

traditionalinvestmentstreamschanging?

Medtechinvestmentsanddealactivitypeakedin2021asthe

COVID-19pandemicboosteddemandfordigitaltools,diagnostics,remotepatient-monitoringdevices,andotherinnovations.Even

backthen,themajorityofinvestmentcapitalwenttowardlater-stagediagnosticanddigitalcompanies.3Since2021,thenumberofdeals,theirvalue,andthenumberofstartupsthathavebeenacquired

orgonepublichasdeclinedsteadily(figure1).Severalfactorsmighthavecausedinvestorstochangetheirinvestmentstrategies.

Lowinterestrates,whichhoverednear0%in2021,4mayhaveencouragedsomeventurecapitaliststoconsiderriskier

investments.GregGarfield,seniormanagingdirectoratKCKMedTech,suggestedthatsomeinvestmentdollarsduringthatperiodcamefrominvestorsoutsideoftraditionalmedtech.

Hereferstothisas“touristcapital.”

By2023,interestratestopped5%,5whichlikelycreatedamorerisk-averseinvestmentlandscape.Thecostofcapitalisnowatitshighestrateinmorethantwodecades.6Asaresult,manyoftheso-calledtouristinvestorslikelyleftthehealthspace,potentiallytopursuebetterunderstoodopportunities.

Figure1.MedtechVCactivityandexitvalueovertime

MedtechVCdealactivity($M)MedtechVCexitvaluebytype($B)

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

20202021202220232024

60

50

2,500

2,000

40

1,500

30

1,000

20

500

10

0

0

20202021202220232024

DealvalueDealcountBuyout/LBOIPOMerger/

acquisition

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

CAGR

Dealcount

2,158

1,997

1,634

1,493

963

-15%

Dealvalue($M)

$30,006

$48,331

$38,522

$36,996

$23,452

-5%

Revenue($M)

$11,354

$21,070

$14,781

$8,965

$3,806

-20%

Avg.EBIDTA

($3,046)

($967)

($850)

($2,256)

($1,330)

-15%

Allinmillions

CAGR=compoundannualgrowthrate

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Buyout/LBO

$0.58

$1.59

$1.89

$4.31

$1.98

IPO

$15.08

$42.42

$23.59

$1.24

$6.28

Merger/

acquisition

$3.84

$10.53

$11.62

$17.45

$6.75

Allinbillions

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

5

Afterpeakingin2021,therehasalsobeenasignificantdownturninVCfundingandexits.7Atthesametime,therehasbeenanincreaseinPEfundingforlessrisky,mid-to-late-stagemedtechinnovation.8OursecondaryresearchsuggeststhatVCandCVCfundingpools

formedtechareshrinkingandpotentiallyshiftingtowardlater-stageandmorematureinnovators.Butwithoutearly-stageinvestors,thepipelinefornew,potentiallylifesavingmedtechcouldrundry.

“Ithinkwe’regoingtoseemoreexamplesoflargecorporates

tryingtofillthegapleftby

underinvestmentinmedtechbytraditionalventurefirms.”

—JoeHeanue,Ph.D.,

CEOTripleRingTechnologies,Inc.

Ourinterviewshelpedtoconfirmthatithasbecomemoredifficult formanystartupstosecurefundingfromVCandCVCinvestors.“Capitalisnotplentifulforall…farfromit,”accordingtoabusinessdevelopmentexecutiveatalargemedtechcompany.Securing

fundingfromVCandCVCinvestors“isaworldofhavesandhave-nots,andtherearemorehave-nots.Thereisnolongeramiddleclassinmedtech.”Unlikebiotechortechnology,medtechhasfewerlargemarketstotapandfewermultibillion-dollarexitopportunities,theexecutiveexplained.Therearealsomorediseasesthatcan

betreatedbypharmaceuticalproductsthanbymedicaldevices.

Moreover,biotechandtechnologyinvestorstendtobelessriskaversethanmedtechinvestors.

ThetraditionalVCinvestorsweinterviewedwerecautious,and

occasionallypessimistic,abouttheoutlookforcertaintypesof

medtechdevices.PEandCVCinvestors,bycontrast,werelargely

optimistic.AaronSandoski,managingdirectorofNorwichVentures,anearly-stagemedtechVC,saidmedicaldevicesappeartobe

“onadownwardtrajectory”giventhedecliningnumberofunmet

clinicalneedsthatdevicescanaddress.Inaddition,hospitals,healthsystems,andcliniciansareunderincreasingfinancialpressure

(see

Deloitte,s2025UShealthcareoutlook

).Tightmarginsoftenmeanthereislessmoneyfornewmedicaldevices.Aphysician-owned

ambulatorysurgerycenter(ASC),heexplained,islesslikelytoinvestinanewdevicethanahospitalthathasalargerbudget.Moreover,healthcareisbecomingincreasinglydecentralizedassome

proceduresthatoncetookplaceonlyinhospitalsarebeingdoneinASCsandotherlower-cost

alternativesitesofcare

.Thistrendcouldcreateasignificantnewmarketfordevicesthatcanbeusedoutsideofahospital,includinginthepatient’shome.ThisalignswithDeloitte’svisionforthe

FutureofHealth

.?

Someintervieweesnotedthattheyareseeingfewerinnovations

inthemedtechspace.Inthepast,surgeonssometimesdevelopedorenhancedmedicaldevicestoaddressunmetclinicalneedsor

toimprovesurgicaloutcomes.9Apost-COVIDbacklogofelective

surgeries,however,mayhaveleftlittletimeforsurgeonstoinnovate,oneintervieweenoted.

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

6

2.Build-to-buyandother

co-developmentarrangements

Thechallenginginvestmentlandscapeforearly-stagemedtechcompaniesappearstohavegeneratedincreasedinterestin

co-developmentinvestmentmodels.Undersucharrangements,anincumbentmedtechcompany(strategic)investsinastartupwiththeintentionofacquiringit,oritsinnovation,inthefuture—oftentoextendanexistingserviceline.Thesestructureddealsaresometimesorchestratedbyathird-partyinvestor.

Strategicinvestorsoftenseektoderiskassetsbeforecommitting

toapurchase,whichiswhytheymightchoosetobuyatalaterstage.Astructuredagreementallowsthemtohavetheoptiontobuy,

assumingthederiskingtakesplace.Areastheylikelywanttoderiskincluderegulatoryapproval,reimbursement/marketaccess,supplychainstability,manufacturingprocesses,andmanagement/

execution.Byensuringtheseelementsaresecured,strategic

investorscanmitigatepotentialrisksandincreasethelikelihoodofsuccessfulintegrationandcommercializationoftheacquiredtechnology.

Theinvestorsweinterviewedoutlinedmechanismsthatcould

providefundingtoearly-stagemedtechcompanies.TheysuggestedsomePEfirms,whicharehistoricallylate-stageinvestors,are

exploringearlier-stageinvestmentsthroughbuild-to-buymodels.

Eachinvestmentstrategycomeswithadvantagesanddisadvantagesforinvestors,entrepreneurs,andstrategics.Structureddealscan

provideentrepreneurswithflexibilityandmultiplepathwaystoliquidity,includinginitialpublicofferings(IPOs)andstrategic

acquisitions.Theseinvestmentmodelscouldbeparticularly

beneficialforstartupsdevelopingtechnologiesthatalignwiththestrategicgoalsofalargermedtechcompany.Hereisanoverviewofseveralco-developmentarrangements:

“Itisbettertobuildabusinesstobeboughtthantobuildabusinesswiththeintentionofsellingit.“

—DavidKereiakes,managingpartnerWindhamCapitalPartners

?Build-to-buy:Atitscore,thismodelisacollaborativepartnership

betweenanentrepreneurorstartupandanincumbentmedtech

company/strategic.Typically,astrategicidentifiesanearly-stage

companythathasaproductofinterestandnegotiatestheterms

ofitsinvestment.Thispartnershipallowsbothentitiestowork

towardacommongoal,combiningthesmallercompany’s

agilityandinnovationwiththelargercompany’sresources,

experience,andmarketreach.Forearly-stagecompanies,

suchanarrangementcanprovideastructuredpathwayfor

innovationandacquisitionwhileminimizingfinancialrisk.Atthe

sametime,itofferslargecompaniesafinancialstakeininnovativecompaniesthatshowpromise.Sometimesthisrelationshipbeginsduringthecompanyformationstage—beforeatechnologyis

developed—iftheinnovatorhasacompellingvalueproposition.Theproductorsolutionmightbetailoredtomeetthespecific

needsofthelargerstrategic,whichcanimprovethechancesofitbeingacquired.Anentrepreneurtryingtogetanewcompanyoffthegroundmightnothavethetimeorcapacitytochasefunding.Thistypeofpartnershipallowsbothentitiestoworktowardacommongoal,leveragingeachother’sstrengths.Build-to-buyhastendedtobeastapleinthebiotechnologyspace,providingastructuredpathwayforinnovationandacquisition.Inmedtech,however,thisinvestmentstrategyappearstobeinits

nascentstages.

Thebuild-to-buymodelalsoinvolvestakinganownershipstakeinthestartupcompany,fillingboardseats,andretainingtheoptiontobuythecompanyifmilestonesaremet.Intheend,startups

mightchoosetotradefuturevaluations—potentiallyathigher

levels—togetthefinancinganddevelopmenthelptheyneed.Forstrategics,thebuild-to-buymodelcanprovideaguaranteeontheirinvestmentandreducecompetitionfromotherbuyers.However,someinvestorstoldusthatgettingstrategicstothenegotiating

tablecanrequirecarefulorchestration.

?Buy-to-build:Unlikethebuild-to-buymodel,buy-to-buildbeginsbyidentifyingthetypesofproductsastrategicwantstoadd

toitsportfolio.Thisstrategycanmakeiteasiertoidentifythe

typesofinnovatorstotarget.Inthismodel,aPEfirmmightuseawell-positionedplatformcompanytomakeadd-onacquisitionsofsmallercompanies.Thesesmallercompanieswouldbecomecomponentsoftheplatformcompany.

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

7

“Bycreatingaplatformcompanythatactslikeaholdingcompany,youcanmakeanumberofsmallerinvestmentsthatexpand

andacceleratedevelopmentopportunitiesacrossmultiple

productsandtechnologies,”explainedTimDugan,founder

andmanagingpartneratWaterStreetHealthcarePartners.

“Thecompanyessentiallyactsasaventuremicro-fundwiththesupportofaPEfund.”Thisportfolioholdingcompanycouldallowformoreflexibilityandincrementalimprovements,makingitanattractiveoptionforPEfirmslookingtoenhancethevalueoftheiracquisitions.DavidBeylik,apartneratAjaxHealth,notedthathisfirmfocusesonacombinationofcompanyformationand

acquisitiontomeettheneedsofastrategicpartner.Itsprocessbeginsbyaligningwithastrategiconaverticalandthenidentifyingthetypesofproductsthatareneeded.Thishelpstoidentifytheinnovatorstotarget.Buildinganewcompanyoff-the-balance

sheet(forthestrategic),canhelplimitdistractionswhilebuildingatailor-fitportfolio.

?Hybridinvestmentmodels:Early-stagemedtechcompanies

aretypicallyfundedbythefounders,theirfamiliesandfriends,

andangelinvestors.Foundersmightalsoturntohigh-net-worth

individualsand/orfamilyofficesforfundingwhenmoretraditionalsources,likeVCfirms,arereluctanttoinvest.Inadditionto

personalnetworks,someearly-stagemedtechcompaniessecuregovernmentgrantsortapfundingfromnonprofitorganizations.

Forexample,ratherthanjustdonatingmoneyformedical

research,somepatientadvocacygroupsandfoundationshave

established,orareinterestedinestablishing,venturefunds.“Ifyoucangetapatientadvocacygrouporphysiciansocietybehindyourproduct,thenyou’vegotkindofabuilt-inkindofcheeringsquad

fortheproduct,”saidPaulGrand,CEOofMedTechInnovator.

Partneringwithadvocacygroupsmightalsoattracttheattentionofcommercialhealthplansandgovernmentpayers,whichcould

helpreducefuturereimbursementhurdles,headded.However,

patientadvocacygroupsandfoundationsmightnotunderstand

themedtechindustryaswellastheymightunderstand

biopharma.Thesehybridarrangements—whichblendtraditionalventurewithalternativesourcesofcapitaltosupportearly-stagecompaniesthroughtheirdevelopmentcycles—arebecomingmorecommoninmedtech(see

Reinvigoratingmedtechinnovation

).

?Structureddeals:Theseareavariationofthehybridbuild-to-buymodel.Unlikeatraditionalbuild-to-buy,whichistypicallybetweenastartupandastrategic,astructureddealisoftenathree-way

marriagebetweenalargestrategiccompany,aninvestor,andastartup.Sucharrangementscouldbeattractivetoastrategicasameansofmitigatingrisk.Regardingthesethree-waydeals,JoeMullings,CEOofsearchfirmTheMullingsGroupsaid,

“You’regoingtoseethelargestrategicsdooff-balance-sheet

investmentsthatallowthemtocontinuetoinvestwithout

impactingshareprices.”Oneventurecapitalinterviewee

referencedBlackstoneInc.asanexemplarthatisdoing“financialengineeringconstructsofdifferentflavors,whetherthey’rebuild-to-buyorfranklyprovidingtransactionstomovetheseassetsofftheP&Lofthebuyer.”

However,therecanbechallengesingettingallthreepartiesto

agree.Theinvestmentfirmmightwantmorecontrolbecauseit

hasinvestedcapital.Thestartup’sCEOhasthevisionandmight

expectgreatercontrol.Andthestrategic’sboardmightwantmorecontrolbecauseitcouldwinduppayingasignificantpremiumtoacquirethestartup.ToddPope,apartnerwithRevivalHealthcareCapital,notedstructureddealscanbechallenging.“Itcantake

significanttimeandefforttocometoathree-wayagreement

betweentheinvestor,thestrategic,andthetargetcompany.Whenthisalignmentdoesoccur,structureddealscanofferapathfor

thestrategictoacquireacompanyafterkeymilestonesaremet.It’snotamodelforeveryone,butwheninterestsarealigneditcanreduceriskforallparties.”

“Theemergenceofbuild-to-buymodelsprovidesastructuredpathwayforinnovationwhilemanagingfinancialrisks.“

—ToddPope,partner

RevivalHealthcareCapital

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

8

3.Governanceinsightsforcomplexdealstructures

Anewtechnologyorinnovationmightnotbeenoughtoattract

investors.Effectivegovernanceandinvestorinvolvementare

importantforthesuccessofstartups.Investorscanaddvalue

throughtalentrecruitment,raisingadditionalcapital,andprovidingspecializedinputintoregulatoryandreimbursementprocesses.

Forexample,Revival,aPEinvestorthatspecializesinmedical

devicesanddiagnostics,investsinstartupmedtechcompanies,

provideshands-onleadershipandresources,andthenhelpsthosecompaniesgrowandexpand.10However,theremayalsobebad

adviceandstrategicmisdirectionfrominvestors,whichcanhindertheprogressofstartups.“Themedtechlandscapeisfilledwith

promisingtechnologiesthatdidn’tadvancebecauseleadershipneededsupporttotakethecompanytothenextlevel,”WaterStreet’sDugansaid.

Astartupcompanyshouldbeabletodemonstratestrongleadershipandanabilitytomakegooddecisions.Thecompany’sleadersshouldpossesstheskillsandbackgroundnecessarytomoveacompany

fromthegroundlevelintothenextphase.Goodgovernanceis

involvedinensuringmilestonesarereachedontime.Governancemechanismsandcompensationstrategiescanhelpensurethatkeystakeholdersremainmotivatedandfocusedonachievinggoals.Astartupcompanymighthavemultiplefounders,eachwithdifferentstrengths,butitshouldonlyhaveoneCEO.Theretendstobelessfrictioninanewcompanywhenthereisasharedeconomicvisionamongthefounders,butoneoverallleader.Thereisadangerthatastartupmightburnthroughitscapitalandhavelimitedfundingtopaythecompany’sleadersandkeystaff.

“Communicationmightbethemostcriticaltraitofanyentrepreneur.Youmustbeabletocommunicateandconvinceasoftwareengineer,an

investor,anaccountant,andasalesreptocomealongwithyouona

journey.Communicationhasahighcorrelationwithsuccess.”

—DavidKereiakes,managingpartnerWindhamCapitalPartners

Inabuild-to-buymodel,strategicsandinvestorsshouldensure

thatthecompany’scoreemployeesareincentivizedtomovethe

organizationforwardandmeetmilestones.Incentivesystemsare

involvedinattractingandretainingtalent,aligninginterestsof

foundersandinvestors,andavoidingconflicts.Culturalintegrationshouldalsobeconsideredwhenembarkingonabuild-to-buy

arrangement.Mergingtheculturesofalargecorporationwithan

innovativestartupcancreatechallenges.Differencesin

organizationalstructure,managementstyles,andoperational

processescanleadtofrictionandhindertheseamlessintegrationofthenewcompany.Inaddition,thetypicallyslowandbureaucraticprocessesofalargecompanycouldhinderthecreativityandgrowthofastartup.“Oneofthebiggestchallengeswefaceisaligningthe

innovativespiritofstartupswithourestablishedcorporateculture,”aseniorexecutivefromalargemedtechcompanytoldus.

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

9

4.Thecurrentinvestmentlandscapeinmedtech

Agrowingnumberofmedtechinvestorsaresidesteppingearly-stagemedtechcompaniesinfavorofmorestable,later-stagecompanies(see

Reinvigoratingmedtechinnovation

).Manyoftheseinvestors

requirethosecompaniestoprovideclinicaldataandotherevidencebeforecommittingtofunding.ThisshifthasincreasedthepressureonSeriesBcompanies,makingitharderforthemtoraisecapital

comparedtoSeriesAorCrounds.Overthepastfouryears,theproportionofseed-roundandearly-stageVCdealshasdeclinedinbothdealcountanddealvaluecomparedtootherdealtypes,accordingtoDeloitte’sanalysisofinvestmentdata.11

ManyVCcompaniesinvestinmoreestablishedcompaniessothattheycanrealizereturnsmorequickly.However,evenlater-stagecompaniesaretakinglongertoexitthemarket.MikaNishimura,anoperationalpartnerwithGildeHealthcarePartners,shared

thatherlate-stageVCinvestmentcompanyhastendedtotargetcompaniesthathavethepotentialtoexitthemarketafterthreetofiveyears.Overthepastseveralyears,changesinthemarkethavecausedthattimelinetosignificantlystretch,shesaid.

NorwichVentures’Sandoskisuggestedtheremaybemore

opportunityformedtechstartupsthatfocusonsoftware.

“Theyoungergenerationofentrepreneursisnotsointerestedinmedicaldevices…they’reinterestedinsoftware,”hesaid.

Severalintervieweesechoedthissentimentandagreedtheremightbemorepotential,andinterest,inmedicalsoftware

whencomparedtohardware.

Buttherewilllikelyalwaysbeaneedforinnovativehardwarein

medtech—andinnovatorswhocanbuildabettermousetrapanddominateacompetitivemarket.Caseinpoint:Inlate2023,theUSFood&DrugAdministration(FDA)approvedpulsedfieldablation(PFA)foratrialfibrillation.Ratherthanusingheatorcoldenergy,asintraditionalablation,PFAusesshortburstsofenergy.The

innovationappearstohavefewerdownsiderisksandbetterpatientoutcomes.12PFAdevicesarenowbeingusedinclinicalsettings.13

Investorsseepotentialinproductsfortheheartandmind

Cardiovascularproducts,cancerdiagnostics,andneurostimulationwerementionedaskeyinvestmentcategoriesamongtheinvestorsweinterviewed.WhileCVCinvestorssawhighpotentialinthose

areas,VCinvestorsweremorecautious.PEinvestorsalsosawpotentialinneurostimulationandrobotics.

Cardiovasculardevicesandsolutionshaveconsistentlybeenafocalpointforinvestorsduetothehighprevalenceofheartdisease

andtheongoingdemandforinnovativediagnosticsandtreatmentoptions.14Inthefirstquarterof2024,cardiovascularsolutions

attracted$650millioninventurecapital,underscoringarobust

investorconfidenceinthepotentialforinnovationandgrowthinthissubsector.15Thesignificantinvestmentinthiscategoryhighlights

ongoingeffortstodeveloptechnologiesthatcanimprovepatient

outcomes,reducemortalityrates,andenhancethequalityoflife.

Innovationsinthecardiovascularspaceincludeminimallyinvasive

surgicaltools,advancedimagingtechnologies,andnoveltherapeuticdevicesthatoffereffectiveandminimallyinvasivetreatment

options.Investorstendtobemorecomfortablewiththepredictableregulatorypathwaysandestablishedmarketdemandintheseareas.

Beyondcardiovascularproducts,thereisagrowinginterestin

innovationsthataddressmemoryloss,Alzheimer’sdisease,andotherbrain-relatedissues.Thebrainremainsoneoftheleast

understoodorgans,whichcouldbeagrowthareaformedtech

innovators.CeriBellInc.,acommercial-stagemedtechcompany

focusedonthediagnosisandmanagementofneurological

conditions,isamongthefewmedtechcompaniestohavehad

aninitialpublicstockoffering(IPO)duringthepastfewyears.Thecompany’sheadbanddeviceisdesignedtospeedseizuredetectioninhospitals.16CeriBell’sIPOwasissuedinOctober2024.Other

recentmedtechIPOsincludeBetaBionics(January30,2025)17andKestraMedicalTechnologies(March2025).18

Traversingthemedtechinvestmentlandscape|Isbuild-to-buythenextfrontier?

10

Whilecancertreatmenthastraditionallybeendominatedby

biopharma,medtechinnovatorsareexploringnewavenues—

suchasradiationandotherenergy-basedtreatments—totreat

thedisease.Inaddition,artificialintelligence(AI)toolsarebeing

integratedintosomedevicestoenhancedetectionandtreatment.Earlydiagnostictools,includingadvancedbloodtests,arebecomingmoreproficientatdetectingcancerinitsearlieststages,offeringapotentialareaforfurtherinvestment.

Painmanagementisanotherpotentialgrowthareafor

innovatorsandinvestors.Paintendstobeacomplexand

notyetfullyunderstoodarea.Somemedtechcompaniesare

exploringapproachestopainrelief,includingneurostimulation

andpersonalizedtreatmentplans.Personalizedcareandremotemonitoringtechnologiesarealsogainingtraction,drivenbytheirabilitytot

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論