1、 德信誠(chéng)培訓(xùn)網(wǎng)危險(xiǎn)源識(shí)別及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)控制程序Hazard source identification and risk evaluation control procedure（ISO45001：2017）1.目的Purpose: 對(duì)本公司能夠控制和可望施加影響的危險(xiǎn)因素進(jìn)行辨識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià)，并從中評(píng)價(jià)出重要危害因素，為建立職業(yè)健康安全目標(biāo)指標(biāo)實(shí)施運(yùn)行控制和改善安全衛(wèi)生行為提供依據(jù)。To identify and evaluate the controllable and excepted and influenced hazard aspects, identify the important ha

2、zard aspect, provide the reference for the establishment of the occupational health and safety objectives and the implementation of the operational control and the improvement of safety and health behavior. 2.適用范圍Application scope:本程序適用于公司產(chǎn)品、活動(dòng)及服務(wù)等危害辨識(shí)和危險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)。It is applicable to the hazard identificat

3、ion and evaluation for the companys products, activities, services and etc. 3.定義Definition：無(wú) N/A4.職責(zé)Responsibility:4.1 各部門：負(fù)責(zé)辨識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià)本部門的危害因素。4.1 Each Department: To identify and evaluate the hazard aspect within the department. 4.2 人力資源部：負(fù)責(zé)辨識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)方的危害因素及危險(xiǎn)因素的匯總審核組織評(píng)價(jià)和確定重要危險(xiǎn)因素各部門協(xié)助。4.2 Human Resources

4、dept. : To summarize and review the identification and evaluation of the related hazard aspect and risk aspect and organize to evaluate and define the important risk aspect, coordinate with each dept. 4.3 管理者代表：負(fù)責(zé)重要危害因素評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果的審批。4.3 Management Representative: To approve the result of the important ris

5、k aspect evaluation. 5.程序Operational procedure:5.1危害因素的辨識(shí)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)Risk aspect identification and risk evaluation5.1.1危害因素的辨識(shí)與評(píng)價(jià)范圍分兩大部分：5.1.1 The scope of the risk aspect identification and evaluation including two parts:5.1.1.1 公司內(nèi)部：即公司各部門自身的日?；顒?dòng)及有行政管理活動(dòng)范圍。5.1.1.1 Internal of the company: The daily acti

6、vities of the company's various departments and administrative activities.5.1.1.2 相關(guān)方：即公司對(duì)行政管轄區(qū)域內(nèi)建筑施工或供貨商等可施加影響的活動(dòng)產(chǎn)品服務(wù)范圍。5.1.1.2 The related parties: the activities, products and services scope can be affected by the construction or suppliers etc. within the administrative jurisdiction of the co

7、mpany .5.1.2 各部門首先應(yīng)按照本程序的內(nèi)容和要求，分別識(shí)別出內(nèi)部自身的和對(duì)口業(yè)務(wù)相關(guān)方的能夠控制和可施加影響的危害因素，并加以判斷評(píng)價(jià)出具有重大危害影響或可能具有重大危害影響的因素。辨識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià)的結(jié)果應(yīng)分別填寫在危害辨識(shí)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)清單上經(jīng)部門負(fù)責(zé)人審核確認(rèn)后上交人力資源部。5.1.2 Firstly each department, based on the content and requirements of this procedure, separately identify the hazard factors from their own and interface bu

8、siness related parties can control and give the influence and to judge and determine the factors with significant impacts or possible have significant impact; the identification and evaluation results should be separately filled in the “hazard identification and risk evaluation list”, and provided t

9、o human resources department after checked by the department responsible staff. 5.1.3 安全主任對(duì)各部門上交的結(jié)果進(jìn)行復(fù)核，必要時(shí)加以補(bǔ)充，將最終整理出的結(jié)果填寫危害辨識(shí)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)清單，交管理者代表審核。5.1.3 Safety Officers re-check the results from each department, if necessary, provide some supplement; and finalize the results in the “hazard identificati

10、on and risk evaluation list” to management representative for approval; 5.1.4 各部門將本部門確認(rèn)后的危害辨識(shí)及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)清單留存一份，向本部門的員工進(jìn)行宣傳，以便明確本部門的危害因素對(duì)其加以控制和施加影響。5.1.4 Each department should keep one copy of the confirmed hazard identification and risk evaluation list and publicize it to their employees to clarify the d

11、epartment's hazard factors and then control and affect them;5.1.5 危害辨識(shí)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)工作每年進(jìn)行一次，由人力資源部組織進(jìn)行。5.1.5 Hazard Identification and risk evaluation should be organized by human resource department and conducted once per year; 5.1.6 各部門在發(fā)生以下情況時(shí)應(yīng)重新辨識(shí)與評(píng)價(jià)危害因素，及時(shí)更新：5.1.6 each department should re-identify

12、 and re-evaluate the hazard factors and update it timely for the following cases: 5.1.6.1 管理體系或產(chǎn)品、活動(dòng)及服務(wù)發(fā)生重大變化（增加或減少）。5.1.6.1 significant change(increase or decrease) for the management system or products , activities and services.5.1.6.2 有關(guān)的安全法律、法規(guī)修訂或廢止。5.1.6.2 the relevant safety legal and regulato

13、ry are amended or repealed.5.1.6.3 本公司的發(fā)展規(guī)劃作調(diào)整或開發(fā)建設(shè)發(fā)生較大變化。5.1.6.3 adjust the companys development plan or bigger change for the development and construction5.1.6.4 定期測(cè)量結(jié)果發(fā)生變化。5.1.6.4 results change for the periodical measurement;5.1.6.5 材料、設(shè)施或設(shè)備發(fā)生變更。5.1.6.5 materials, facilities or equipment change5

14、.1.6.6 發(fā)生了緊急情況或安全事故。5.1.6.6 undergone emergency or security incidents.5.1.6.7 相關(guān)方有建議或抱怨。5.1.6.7 suggestion or complaint from the related parties;5.1.6.8 重新辨識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià)危害因素的程序按5.1.15.1.25.1.35.1.4款進(jìn)行。5.1.6.8 re- identification and evaluation of risk factors according to the clause 5.1.1,5.1.2,5.1.3,5.1.4;5.

15、2 在進(jìn)行危害因素評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)應(yīng)考慮以下方法：各部門負(fù)責(zé)人對(duì)各自辨識(shí)出的危害因素逐一進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)，評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)可采用是非判斷法作業(yè)條件危險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)法進(jìn)行。5.2 When conduct the risk factors evaluation, should consider the following methods: each department responsible staff should evaluate their own identified risk factors one by one, can use the yes-no judgment method and operation con

16、dition risk evaluation method for implementation; 5.2.1 是非判斷法。凡屬于以下情況之一者就可以直接評(píng)價(jià)為重要危害因素5.2.1 Yes-no judgment method. Where belongs to one of the following can be directly evaluated as significant risk factors :5.2.2 違反相關(guān)的國(guó)家或地方法律法規(guī)的要求。5.2.2 in violation of the requirements of the relevant national or

17、local legal and regulatory;5.2.3 可能在緊急情況下產(chǎn)生重大危害影響或人員傷亡的。5.2.3 likely to generate significant hazard impacts or injuries in case of emergency.5.2.4 違反相關(guān)方的合理要求或相關(guān)方有嚴(yán)重的合理抱怨的。5.2.4 in violation of the reasonable demands of related parties or reasonable complaints from related parties.5.2.5 作業(yè)條件危險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)法。不能用

18、是非判斷法直接評(píng)價(jià)的，可以采用半定量計(jì)算法，也即作業(yè)條件危險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)法，計(jì)算每種危險(xiǎn)源所帶來(lái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)采用如下方法：D=LEC L發(fā)生事故的可能性大小。將發(fā)生事故可能性極小的分?jǐn)?shù)定為0.1，而必然要發(fā)生的事故的分?jǐn)?shù)定為10，介于這兩種情況指定為若干間值，如下表：5.2.5 Operation conditions risk evaluation method; when can not make the direct evaluation with yes-no judgment method, can use the semi-quantitative calculation method, tha

19、t is operation condition risk evaluation method, to calculate the hazard posed by each risk using the following method : D = LEC L-possibility of accidents occurrence; define the value for the very small possibility of the incidents occurrence as 0.1 , and the values for the incident is bound to be

20、occurred as 10 , between these two cases define a number of specified values as the following table:分?jǐn)?shù)值Value事故發(fā)生的可能性possibility for incidents occurrence10完全可以預(yù)料Is fully expected6相當(dāng)可能Is likely to3可能、但不經(jīng)常Possible, but not often1可能性較小、完全意外Less likely , totally unexpected0.5很不可能、可能設(shè)想Very unlikely , is p

21、ossible to envisage0.2極不可能Highly unlikely0.1實(shí)際不可能Practically impossibleE暴露于危險(xiǎn)環(huán)境的頻繁程度。人員出現(xiàn)在危險(xiǎn)環(huán)境中的時(shí)間越多則危險(xiǎn)性越大。連續(xù)出現(xiàn)在危險(xiǎn)環(huán)境情況定為10非常罕見地出現(xiàn)在危險(xiǎn)環(huán)境中定為0.5介于兩者之間的各種情況規(guī)定若干個(gè)中間值如下表：E- frequency to exposed in hazardous environment. more time the person is exposed in hazardous environment, the risk is greater. Define t

22、he case that is continuously exposed in the hazardous environment as 10 , very rarely exposed in hazardous environments as 0.5; and define a number of intermediate values for the cases between those two cases; the as following table shown:暴露于危險(xiǎn)環(huán)境中頻繁程度f(wàn)requency to exposed in hazardous environments（E）

23、分?jǐn)?shù)值Value頻繁程度Frequency10連續(xù)暴露Continuous exposure6每天工作時(shí)間內(nèi)暴露Daily working hours within the exposure3每周一次，或偶然暴露Once a week, or accidental exposure2每月一次暴露Monthly time exposure1每年幾次暴露Several times a year exposed0.5非常罕見的暴露Very rare exposureC發(fā)生事故產(chǎn)生的后果。事故造成的人身傷害與財(cái)產(chǎn)損失變化范圍極大所以規(guī)定分?jǐn)?shù)值為1100把需要救護(hù)的輕微傷害或較小財(cái)產(chǎn)損失分?jǐn)?shù)規(guī)定為1其它

24、情況數(shù)值為1100之間如下表C- accident consequences; since the change range for the accidents caused personal injury and property damage is great, define the score range from 1 to 100; to define the score for the minor injury needed for ambulance or minor property as 1; for other situations, the value is between

25、 1 and 100 , the following table :發(fā)生事故產(chǎn)生的后果(C)Accident consequences occurs分?jǐn)?shù)值Value發(fā)生事故產(chǎn)生的后果Accident consequences occurs100大災(zāi)難許多人死亡A major disaster , many people were killed40災(zāi)難數(shù)人死亡Disaster , the number of people were killed15非常嚴(yán)重一人死亡Very serious , one death7嚴(yán)重重傷A serious , serious injuries3重大致殘Mater

26、ial , disability1引人注目需要救護(hù)Compelling need ambulance5.2.6危險(xiǎn)等級(jí)劃分Hazard classification依據(jù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)值D來(lái)確定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)級(jí)別而這個(gè)界限值并不是長(zhǎng)期固定不變?cè)诓煌瑫r(shí)期應(yīng)根據(jù)其具體情況來(lái)確定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)級(jí)別的界限值以符合持續(xù)改進(jìn)的思想。下表內(nèi)容可作為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)級(jí)別界限值的參考。Based on the risk value D to determine the risk level, and this valued is not a long-term fixed, at different times, according to their s

27、pecific situation to determine the risk level value to meet the continuous improvement of ideas. The table contents can be used as the reference risk level threshold.危險(xiǎn)等級(jí)劃分（D）Hazardous classificationD值Value危險(xiǎn)程度The degree of risk320極其危險(xiǎn)，不能繼續(xù)作業(yè)Extremely dangerous and can not continue operations160320高

28、度危險(xiǎn)需立即整改High-risk , requiring immediate rectification70160顯著危險(xiǎn)需要整改Significant danger, require corrective action 2070一般危險(xiǎn)需要注意General, need to pay attention20稍有危險(xiǎn)可以接受Slightly dangerous , can accept5.2.7根據(jù)D值決定危害因素是否為可接受的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)D值在70分以下的危害因素為可接受的危險(xiǎn)D值在70分以上者為不可接受的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)并將其劃分為三級(jí)第三級(jí)最重要不可接受的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)須作優(yōu)先等級(jí)鑒定。列為最優(yōu)先等級(jí)。5.2.7

29、according to D value determine whether risk factors is an acceptable risk or not: D value less than 70 points as the acceptable risk , D value more than 70 points as an unacceptable risk , and divide it into three grade , third grade the most important and unacceptable level risk should be determine

30、d the priority, to rank as highest priority level.a第一級(jí)320分以上必須立即采取行動(dòng)。不符合安全法規(guī)要求或根據(jù)外部團(tuán)體所關(guān)注的問(wèn)題同時(shí)也列作第一級(jí)優(yōu)先評(píng)定。a first level : 320 points or more , must take immediate action . Do not meet safety regulatory, or under external groups ' concerns , and also classified as first -class priority.b第二級(jí)160320分的列入近期或中期目標(biāo)指標(biāo)改善。b Second level : 160 320 points , included in the short or medium-term objectives and targets improvement.c第三級(jí)70160分的不立即采取行動(dòng)列入運(yùn)作控制并入目標(biāo)指標(biāo)改善。c Third level : 70 to 160 p